To: Clintonfatigued
I don't know if this is a shot in the arm for the GOP, but it is a shot in the arm for Constitutionalism, which has not been doing all that well lately.
2 posted on
03/18/2007 10:00:13 AM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(If the GOP were to stop worshiping Free Trade as if it were a religion, they'd win every election)
To: Clintonfatigued
The three front runners in the Republican party are all big gun grabbers?
3 posted on
03/18/2007 10:01:21 AM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
To: Clintonfatigued
4 posted on
03/18/2007 10:03:06 AM PDT by
NapkinUser
(Free Ramos and Compean! Disbarment for the Nifong-wannabe Johnny Sutton.)
To: Clintonfatigued
--the Demotraitors will just lie about it in pertinent elections anyway--
5 posted on
03/18/2007 10:03:16 AM PDT by
rellimpank
(-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: Clintonfatigued
It helps to remind people of the Democrats abiding hostility to the Second Amendment and their barely concealed disdain for hunters and gun owners.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
8 posted on
03/18/2007 10:07:23 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Clintonfatigued
I agree. The R's have used and betrayed gun owners for decades.
I dont see how the R's have anything to do with this victory, unless they appointed the judges.
I am just glad that somehow someway some integrity accidentily got thru the courts!
10 posted on
03/18/2007 10:11:54 AM PDT by
Kilt Dad
("Among the other evils being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised")
To: Clintonfatigued
"The appeals court ruling appalls advocates of gun control laws and should alarm the Democratic Party."
Now why should this be so? The appeals court was only following the clear intent of the constitution. If they (Democrats and/or gun control advocates) wish to ban guns, they need only pass a constitutional amendment. See, that's what the rule of law means...not stacking a court with people who will reinterpret the law to mean whatever you want. After all, if their ideas (on gun control) are so good, certainly they will have no problem gathering the necessary support, right?
To: Clintonfatigued
It's a boost... but it's just reclaiming something you had already owned.
13 posted on
03/18/2007 10:16:44 AM PDT by
johnny7
("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
To: Clintonfatigued
15 posted on
03/18/2007 11:26:46 AM PDT by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Clintonfatigued
Already Posted
A Shot in the Arm for the GOP
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1802733/posts Posted by rdb3
On News/Activism 03/18/2007 9:07:40 AM CDT · 39 replies · 779+ views
WP ^ | 18 MARCH 2007 | George F. Will
16 posted on
03/18/2007 12:18:22 PM PDT by
Condor51
(Rudy makes John Kerry look like a Right Wing 'Gun Nut' Extremist)
To: Clintonfatigued
"The court ruled 2 to 1 that the D.C. law, which allows only current and retired police officers to have handguns in their homes, violates the Constitution's Second Amendment" Well, duh. I'm glad somebody actually noticed that.
19 posted on
03/18/2007 1:26:07 PM PDT by
Psycheout
(Sam Brownback. Principled. Conservative. Republican.)
To: Clintonfatigued
Let's all put the 2nd Amendment FIRST!!!!
22 posted on
03/18/2007 4:25:51 PM PDT by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson