Skip to comments.
Iran's military warns U.S. against "stupid move"
Reuters (via Yahoo) ^
| 3/17/07
Posted on 03/17/2007 11:32:59 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Mr. Mojo
These Muslim big mouthes are sure accomplished at braggadocio and killing women, children, handcuffed captives and passers by with implanted bombs......but it any stand up fight, get their asses kicked up over their sheetheads.
The ONLY way to put another 1000 year damper on the Islamist's dream of world domination with hundreds of millions of sex slaves -- is to show them the true and devastating face of WAR..
They NEED to suffer as did the Germans and Japanese.
Have we become to civilized or suicidal to deal with the militant Islamists as we should and as they deserve?
Semper Fi
21
posted on
03/17/2007 2:27:48 PM PDT
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Mr. Mojo
What was the term of reference for such in Joyce's "Ulysses"? "Hairyarse"? Well, he could shove it.
22
posted on
03/17/2007 2:41:12 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: NEPAConservative
I raise you about 250-300 of them. Nothing short of carpet nuking would suffice, for doing otherwise is to gather trouble for the future.
23
posted on
03/17/2007 2:43:13 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: river rat
I do hope that after we crush their nuclear and other offensive military capabilities, we don't try to occupy Iran with ground forces.
24
posted on
03/17/2007 3:07:20 PM PDT
by
karnage
To: Mr. Mojo
Iranians whistling loudly as they walk past the cemetery at midnight!! Idiots!!
To: karnage
I would have thought we learned in Vietnam to NOT send warriors into a hostile environment, unless they were being sent to kill everyone in sight that resisted or showed tendency to resist...
But we did it again is Beirut, Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan and now Iraq.
Our "leaders" are either terminally stupid or intentionally prefer to get our warriors killed and spare the enemy.
We have to stop thinking of ourselves as policemen or an urban renewal workforce.. Leave that to the survivors -- once we've sufficiently punished, defeated and or destroyed the enemy..
Semper Fi
26
posted on
03/17/2007 4:24:17 PM PDT
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: river rat
27
posted on
03/17/2007 5:25:22 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(Unless you're telling me that John Edwards is gay....)
To: Mr. Mojo
I warn Iran's military against any "stupid move".
28
posted on
03/17/2007 5:26:06 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(Unless you're telling me that John Edwards is gay....)
To: river rat
Geez, whaddaya tryinda do, WIN?
29
posted on
03/17/2007 10:51:07 PM PDT
by
karnage
To: karnage
Yes.....to survive and assure the same for my grand-children's grandchildren...
When societies become too civilized to destroy those that directly threaten or attack them -- that society is marked for destruction.
Semper Fi
30
posted on
03/18/2007 12:24:59 AM PDT
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Finalapproach29er
31
posted on
03/18/2007 12:32:47 AM PDT
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
To: Mr. Mojo; SevenofNine
To: river rat
>>> I would have thought we learned in Vietnam to NOT send warriors into a hostile environment . . .
When will we learn? Thanks for the post. I hope with events like the Gathering of Eagles, folks like you will have a chance to speak your mind.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson