Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran's military warns U.S. against "stupid move"
Reuters (via Yahoo) ^ | 3/17/07

Posted on 03/17/2007 11:32:59 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo

Iran's army commander has warned the United States and other Western powers not to make any "stupid move" over Tehran's nuclear work, and suggested they would be surprised by Iran's military response if they attacked.

The comments by the commander-in-chief of the army, reported by newspapers on Saturday, were the latest in a series of defiant statements by Iran's leadership as the United Nations prepares to vote on new sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Iran is embroiled in an escalating dispute over its uranium enrichment, which Iran says is for fuel for power generation but the West suspects is aimed at making nuclear bombs.

The United States says it would prefer a negotiated solution to the crisis, but has not ruled out military options.

Armed forces chief Ataollah Salehi said Iran's military was stronger now than when Iran fought against Iraq in 1980-88.

"And if our bullying enemies make a stupid move, they will certainly be surprised," the daily Siyasat-e Rouz quoted him as saying on Friday.

Military experts say Iranian forces are no technological match for the U.S. military but could still cause havoc in the Gulf and the narrow Strait of Hormuz, a choke point through which two-fifths of the world's traded oil passes.

A draft resolution agreed by the U.N. Security Council's five members with veto power -- the United States, France, Britain, China and Russia -- and Germany was sent to the 15-nation council on Thursday for a vote, expected next week.

It seeks new sanctions including an arms export ban and an expanded asset freeze list over Iran's refusal to suspend uranium enrichment.

Enriched uranium, can be used to generate electricity or, more highly enriched, to make nuclear bombs.

Major powers have demanded that Iran halt such nuclear work as a precondition for broader talks that they say would lead to major trade and diplomatic benefits for the oil-rich country.

But Iranian officials have insisted in recent days that they will not bow to pressure and abandon their atomic ambitions.

"Taking an inappropriate decision by passing a new (U.N.) resolution may bring all kinds of consequences," the IRNA news agency quoted Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki as saying on Saturday.

"We still prefer cooperation and negotiation for reaching a political solution."

Russia urged the United States to show more flexibility toward Iran to solve the crisis.

"On North Korea, they were able to show flexibility, they were able to reach a compromise and got away from demands in the form of ultimatums," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said.

"I think the same approach would help restart negotiations on the Iranian nuclear dossier as well," he said in Moscow.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Mr. Mojo
These Muslim big mouthes are sure accomplished at braggadocio and killing women, children, handcuffed captives and passers by with implanted bombs......but it any stand up fight, get their asses kicked up over their sheetheads.

The ONLY way to put another 1000 year damper on the Islamist's dream of world domination with hundreds of millions of sex slaves -- is to show them the true and devastating face of WAR..

They NEED to suffer as did the Germans and Japanese.
Have we become to civilized or suicidal to deal with the militant Islamists as we should and as they deserve?

Semper Fi
21 posted on 03/17/2007 2:27:48 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

What was the term of reference for such in Joyce's "Ulysses"? "Hairyarse"? Well, he could shove it.


22 posted on 03/17/2007 2:41:12 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NEPAConservative

I raise you about 250-300 of them. Nothing short of carpet nuking would suffice, for doing otherwise is to gather trouble for the future.


23 posted on 03/17/2007 2:43:13 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: river rat

I do hope that after we crush their nuclear and other offensive military capabilities, we don't try to occupy Iran with ground forces.


24 posted on 03/17/2007 3:07:20 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo



Iranians whistling loudly as they walk past the cemetery at midnight!! Idiots!!


25 posted on 03/17/2007 3:47:08 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karnage

I would have thought we learned in Vietnam to NOT send warriors into a hostile environment, unless they were being sent to kill everyone in sight that resisted or showed tendency to resist...

But we did it again is Beirut, Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan and now Iraq.

Our "leaders" are either terminally stupid or intentionally prefer to get our warriors killed and spare the enemy.

We have to stop thinking of ourselves as policemen or an urban renewal workforce.. Leave that to the survivors -- once we've sufficiently punished, defeated and or destroyed the enemy..

Semper Fi


26 posted on 03/17/2007 4:24:17 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: river rat

MEGA DITTOS


27 posted on 03/17/2007 5:25:22 PM PDT by omega4179 (Unless you're telling me that John Edwards is gay....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I warn Iran's military against any "stupid move".


28 posted on 03/17/2007 5:26:06 PM PDT by omega4179 (Unless you're telling me that John Edwards is gay....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

Geez, whaddaya tryinda do, WIN?


29 posted on 03/17/2007 10:51:07 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: karnage
Yes.....to survive and assure the same for my grand-children's grandchildren...

When societies become too civilized to destroy those that directly threaten or attack them -- that society is marked for destruction.

Semper Fi
30 posted on 03/18/2007 12:24:59 AM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er

March 18th....new moon.


31 posted on 03/18/2007 12:32:47 AM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; SevenofNine
George S. Patton - "The Patton Doctrine"
32 posted on 03/18/2007 1:47:58 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

>>> I would have thought we learned in Vietnam to NOT send warriors into a hostile environment . . .

When will we learn? Thanks for the post. I hope with events like the Gathering of Eagles, folks like you will have a chance to speak your mind.


33 posted on 03/18/2007 6:45:56 PM PDT by James W. Fannin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson