Posted on 03/16/2007 3:59:32 PM PDT by shrinkermd
War On Terror: Al-Qaida mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has confessed to being the mastermind for a lot of terrorist crimes. Old news? Hardly. His confession appears to link al-Qaida to Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
War critics argue that Saddam Hussein had little to do with terrorism, and nothing to do with al-Qaida. Since there was no Iraq-al-Qaida link, they say, the U.S. should never have invaded to get rid of Hussein, no matter how evil he was. But something interesting has come out of the interrogations of the lead al-Qaida suspects at Guantanamo.
In particular, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed confirmed what was suspected all along: He was the driving force and chief planner behind 15 years of al-Qaida terrorism — nearly 30 attacks and plots in all. That includes 9/11, the murder of journalist Daniel Pearl and, much earlier, the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.
If so, it further cements the evidence that Iraq was, at minimum, a willing partner of al-Qaida's in the decadelong burst of terrorism that culminated in 9/11. Indeed, Mohammed's Gitmo confession neatly ties the '93 WTC bombing and 9/11 to Iraq and al-Qaida. After all, Iraq had the means — oil money — and the motive — revenge for Hussein's humiliation in the 1991 Gulf War.
Of particular interest is the revelation about Mohammed's involvement in the '93 bombing. It shows a linkage not only between the '93 WTC attack and 9/11, but also between Iraq and al-Qaida.
We already know, for instance, that Abdul Rahman Yasin, the Iraqi responsible for carrying out the '93 bombing, found a haven in Iraq for a decade after the attack. Yasin worked closely with another al-Qaida operative, Ramzi Yousef, on the '93 WTC bombing.
For the record, Yousef is Mohammed's nephew. He was described by the National Commission On Terrorism's 9/11 report as 'the mastermind' of the '93 bombing. And according to U.S. intelligence, he got funding from al-Qaida.
Intelligence documents captured in Baghdad in September 2003 show that Yasin and the others received financial aid from the Iraqi government. This raises a big question: Why would Iraq, under international scrutiny for both WMD and sanctions, support a known terrorist with ties to al-Qaida? The only reasonable answer is, it wanted to keep Yasin quiet about Iraq's involvement.
There's ample evidence of Iraq's role in 9/11 too. The lead 9/11 hijacker, Mohammed Atta, met at least twice with Iraqi intelligence in Europe before carrying out the attacks. And Ahmed Hikmat Shakir, an Iraqi intelligence operative, attended a key meeting of the 9/11 hijackers and other al-Qaida terrorists in January 2000.
Upon capture, Shakir was found to be in contact with Zahid Sheikh Mohammed, brother of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Iraqi Musab Yasin, brother of Abdul Rahman Yasin, and Ibrahim Ahmad Suleiman, a '93 WTC conspirator.
It's pretty clear that al-Qaida and Iraq, far from being enemies, were tactical allies against the U.S. As such, removing Hussein wasn't a distraction from our war on terror; it was vital to it.
Of course if Bush told the truth, the moonbats would accuse him of lying or claiming he had no evidence.
That water-boarding looks like fun
Even Bush appears to be fearful of hammering this home. In fact, he may himself subscribe to the prevailing liberal "wisdom" - he himself has said "no WMDs" and has failed to say anything about AQ-Iraq connections (among other connections, such as with the Pakistani ISI).
Do you think that having sex with a man might help her?
Yeah.... They're appolectic about the surge, but maybe we can have a sense of humor about the thing,
I am baffled by GWB's inability to state the truth and defend his record...sometimes I just have to say that he may is the perfect Manchurian Candidate.
Jet - I've just now sent this to a few people. I'd love to see freepers mail this to their congressmen. Maybe a few Republicans will smarten up and start defending the President and the war.
As you mentioned on another thread, this is why Sen. Levin has changed his tune lately.
Now, how do we ensure this sees the light of day????
Ping; I think this is an issue you were interested in.
Call, (don't bother with Emails) your Governor, state Reps and Senators.
Let them know about this.
Keep trumpeting this until it gets heard.
That's a good point. I'll put it on the calendar and make calls on Monday. My Senator (Lindsey Graham) was also present at the interrogation, but I'll call Senator DeMint and Governor Sanford.
He has been trying to ... but everyone calls him a liar instead of actually listening to the man
"It's pretty clear that al-Qaida and Iraq, far from being enemies, were tactical allies against the U.S. As such, removing Hussein wasn't a distraction from our war on terror; it was vital to it." Surely you're not so naive to believe the drive-by media democrap sycophants will make this an issue with the American people, after spending so much energy deceiving the people! Surely you're not that naive.
Bush said 'No WMDs'? When? Do you have a link?
I dunno. Would ANY man sleep with her?!!!!
There was a guy on Bill O'Reilly's show tonight...some ex Fed. prosecutor named Flannery...he said that KSM was tortured and this "confession" isn't worth anything...
Boy...he even had BOR screaming at him!!!
Sounds to me like all of the lefties are gonna be SURE and scream coercion and torture re: KSM in order to make sure that Bush can NOT make the case for the Iraq war..EVER!!!
Thanks for posting this.
Your Tony Snow comment is surprisingly true...I thought he'd help carry our water but the thing is it seems he's instructed exactly to a T on pressers as to what "the" stance is and don't stray regardless. If this is the case, why do it?...
Ummm...Tony is a TAD bit busy right now to remember your phone call...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.