Posted on 03/05/2007 8:37:49 AM PST by areafiftyone
An unfortunate video tape (who took it, we wonder?) surfaces. But Romney's campaign quickly condemned Coulter's remarks, and we're fairly certain that Coulter, when she appears on television later today, will criticize Romney for caving to pressure.
Video Link is here CLICK
Redgirl, I supported Mitt before I knew Ann did. I bet it's the same with you. Great minds think alike. : )
It looks like most of you missed this when it was posted as I did. I thought you might want to take a look.
Yes, TA, I have been leaning MR all along since he seems to be the most electable conservative. Do we accept 85% of what we want and win or do we demand 100% and lose, thereby ending up with nothing we want at all?
The company one keeps . Romney has many true Conservatives supporting him , and Coulter just happens to be one more in the long list .
Exactly. I watched it and for the most part wondered if I was supposed to be able to read lips.
This has to be the stupidest video attack ever.
You don't see anything wrong with this video, but you called it "unfortunate" in your opening?
The answer is obvious. : ) He would take 85% and so will we!
Again, I have come full circle. That was the subject of my first debate here on FR. My answer remains the same.
Notice Ann says on the video, Mitt has the same views on abortion Reagan had.
There's NOTHING wrong in the video. In fact, it's charming and funny! : )
That portion and something later about "liberal atheists" not being able to attack any of them because "we're not sectarian" "we're all Christian" - "no Sunnis and Shias" are about the only parts I heard. BTW: I appreciated the ping - I rather enjoyed watching them "unpolished" and candid like that, having fun.
did you get a lolipop for # 132?
Your welcome. A lot like being a fly on the wall, LOL! It is fun to watch.
Wait - so John Edwards IS gay? Or are you talking about Isaiah Washington? Both? Who are the gay persons you're referring to?
Coulter exposes RINOs.. they cannot help themselves..
Shes good at exposeing poseurs, fakes, phonies, moles and Trojan Horses..
Sooo she got you eh!.. You've been outed..
I like Hunter too, but his appearance problems continue to plague him. Tonight on Glenn Beck's CNN|HN show, Hunter looked like he had just awakened the morning after a drunken stupor. Dark bags under his eyes, slouching as usual, cheap-looking clothes. Does he have any staff at all?
"People that I spoke to were hungry for someone who would FIGHT, not adopt a "new tone," not cooperate. That's why I said I thought Rudy's speech was mediocre. He had a lot of chances to "buff up" and whiffed. Mitt's talk was better, but still not hitting all the right notes."
Interesting analysis.
Drop the tagline.
Anyone that would like to view my post history will notice I'm not a liberal trolling the site.
Are we not allowed to have differing opinions within the conservative group? If not, what differentiates us from the liberal groups that are often mocked (rightly so) on this site?
Rush said the same thing, about two days ago. He's not endorsing Rudy, but is saying that part of Rudy's appeal is the perception that he will fight. Newt would fight, too, but Newt didn't have the clout to sustain the battle.
I reviewed your history - tossup in my opinion. Between shots at conservatives and republicans like Beck, Coulter and Hannity, you talk sports and call moderators idiots (as you did on 12-5). Think the moderator who told you to knock off the tagline is an idiot too?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.