I don't object to the tenor or intensity of the interchanges; I object to the imputation of motives (you should have been me during the Iraq war debate in 2002-2003 for a "good" time), the name calling, and, really, the use of acronyms and barely misspelled words to feign "disguised" profanity. And that's from someone who privately uses profanity far, far too much.
It's sad. Really sad. We're becoming like DU, I suspect, except that I've never been to that site.
I have never even looked at DU.
I don't mind a heated discussion but recently the remarks are not a discussion and it drowns out any reasonable debate.
Last night was a real eye opener no matter who anyone supported.
My take on you is that you ain't yet really sure what you believe, and much too tempted to be politically correct, to ever be reliable! All you seem to be concerned with is your popularity factor!
I will never expect you to type out anything, until you check the wind out, first!
I'm done with debate, where I stand now is where I'm going to stand, period!
There is no room for "peacekeepers" here, way too late for that!
The "moderate republicans" have made proposals, a bunch of us have said, "Hell, no"! Nothing complicated about that, time for a pissing match, check your ammunition!
I say "NO", HELL NO", to all your liberal crap, best you figure out what it will take, to shove it down my throat.
I never bluff!
We probably don't agree on a broad array of issues, but you are an interesting person to debate with; keep up the good work.