Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TAdams8591
With 64% of the American public stating they wouldn't vote for him, that someone's NOT Newt.

Perhaps, that's what elections are about. If he enters and Republican's don't vote for him because of his "negatives", he loses. Same for the general.

Based on negatives, Hillary doesn't stand a chance, it's Obama in a landslide followed by Edwards. And Giuliani is the only Republican with a remote chance of beating Obama, particularly Obama/Edwards. Things will change.

1,963 posted on 03/02/2007 6:46:12 AM PST by SJackson (No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms, Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1952 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

I think Mitt is the only canndidate with the appeal to beat either Hillary or Obama.


1,968 posted on 03/02/2007 6:58:45 AM PST by TAdams8591 (Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1963 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Based on negatives, Hillary doesn't stand a chance

Yes, and the D's will be stupid if they nominate her. Let's not follow them in their stupidity to nominate someone on our side with even HIGHER negatives. (Hillary's are 48% last time I saw, and as it was pointed out, Newt's are in the 60's.)

1,982 posted on 03/02/2007 7:31:49 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1963 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson