Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
Based on negatives, Hillary doesn't stand a chance

Yes, and the D's will be stupid if they nominate her. Let's not follow them in their stupidity to nominate someone on our side with even HIGHER negatives. (Hillary's are 48% last time I saw, and as it was pointed out, Newt's are in the 60's.)

1,982 posted on 03/02/2007 7:31:49 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1963 | View Replies ]


To: zbigreddogz
Yes, and the D's will be stupid if they nominate her. Let's not follow them in their stupidity to nominate someone on our side with even HIGHER negatives. (Hillary's are 48% last time I saw, and as it was pointed out, Newt's are in the 60's.)

I understand that arguement in favor of Guiliani, personally I won't default to him based on polls. I think Gingrich can address those issue if he runs. And who knows, maybe Romney can get to a point where more than a third of voters have an opinion, or Hunter to where they'll include him in the polls. The numbers being discussed above were from the Jan 30-31 Fox poll.

2,016 posted on 03/02/2007 8:32:09 AM PST by SJackson (No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms, Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1982 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson