Posted on 02/28/2007 7:54:19 AM PST by Al Simmons
I posted directly to YOU that the site YOU post on refers to Jim Robinson as The Grifter.
Let's be clear about that. It would be a nice change if you told the truth once in a while.
That's your problem, not mine.
At least my posts make sense. :-)
What do you think protecting gay "rights" means? What do you think the liberals are pushing in every school district in America?
I can understand that. I haven't seen your name much on the Rudy threads. Maybe you are not aware that there is a group of posters who truly are Rudy haters?
Actually, it's your problem, on display. I couldn't care less.
Intermission time for me. LOL
OK...now I have read this thread up to post 180. Can I come in here, or do I need to go back and read all the rest of the replies first?
...and you're right, if Jim Robinson wants you logged off, he will do it....
..it's not my call.
But personally, I don't think I can pretend everything is normal on the ATRW thread, when you say such uncivil things to Jim Robinson on this one.
I love those folks there, but the values he holds are the values I respect....and I know many on that thread hold the same values ...
..but they have very full plates, worries, illnesses, etc., and don't realize the divisiveness that's brewing outside of ATRWland....It is a refuge, an oasis for them and I understand this.
But I also know there are others who are aligned with you against him here that share that thread...
..How you can disrespect Jim & yet post recipes & daily events by using this forum to take advantage of Jim's good grace and amazing patience is beyond me.
I cannot do this anymore.
That's not the way I'm wired!!
Then why did you post back?
Sorry, there is no room for compromise when compromise means giving up the fight for life and liberty.
Don't use that kind of language.
There is a group who spam threads, always say the same thing, name call, are vitriolic etc. They call Rudy supporters treasonous liberals. Are you aware of who they are?
I am not sure if he would or not overturn those executive orders like Clinton did with Reagan's orders when he entered office. To assume he would appoint conservative judges to the USSC is an assumption I am not confortable with, given his lavish praise of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in the past.
Come on in, Miss Marple. There were a couple of very thoughtful posts on this thread, but the rest has been....well, not worthy of taking the time to read. LOL
The CLOWNS at CP were the ones who used that term "The Grifter". Howlin's site had nothing to do with FR, JR, you, or anyone else here. You claim to have been there, read posts, you should know, without me explaining to you every bit of detail.
Stop acting like you don't know what the hell is going on.
As I already pointed out to you, I wasn't talking about compromising with liberals.
But unless you want to lose everything you've spent years working for, you, too, are going to have to compromise on something sooner or later.
In the big scheme of things, nobody.
Apparently you do, or you wouldn't have asked what I was babbling about.
You can come in here; maybe you'll mist the ugly things they say about CT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.