Is Driving Rinos out of the GOP Good for the Country? Thought-Provoking Must-Read for Rudy-Haters.

FR | April 16, 2002 | Common Tator

[OMalley]

Thats the point i made earlier. first we are zealots and self rightous and then we are disgusting and unprincipled.

We cant both, ya know:)

I think anyone with an ounce of common sense knows we are all just trying to have some fun and get away from the bickering and political chaos.

We know how sweet you are and Ill defend your honor!

[MHGinTN]

The term abolitionist comes to mind as example of how Jim used the word abortionist ... some people just like to find fault and be insulted.

[OMalley]

got coffee here too. no fudge bars, but i got popcycles! help ease the pain a little:)

Our shwans girl was suppose to be here yesterday, i think ive been stood up! drats.

[EternalVigilance]

I figured as much.

[nopardons]

I never called anyone a "religious zealot" and if you are incapable of posting without having to lie about something, then nobody should read anything you write.

I've had a lovely life, unblemished by lascivious, libidinous, licentious, dangerous, reprobative behavior. That you revel in such past days, proves that you still haven;t reached a level of maturity. And it is disengenuous and hypocritical for any of you to condemn anyone else's past behavior.

And it's really a laugh riot, when so many on that thread were talking about what they were drinking while posting! These same people are the ones who call me a drunk and/or talk about what the assume I am drinking when I post. The assumptions are ALL wrong, since I almost never drink an alcoholic beverage. LOL

No, you didn't want me on that thread. I have no stories about being drunk, etc. to tell and do not care to associate with people who enjoy talking/posting about such things.

[do the dhue]

The Republican Party needs the Conservative vote to win.

I don't think it is good for the country to drive pro lifers and 2nd Amendment supporters from the Republican Party.

[Spiff]

You're supporting Hunter, is that right?

I haven't picked a candidate yet. It's too far out. But I do know that I will support a conservative candidate and settle for a semi-conservative candidate if I have to. I will not support a liberal no matter what party he or she is in.

[Spiff]

You're supporting Hunter, is that right?

I haven't picked a candidate yet. It's too far out. But I do know that I will support a conservative candidate and settle for a semi-conservative candidate if I have to. I will not support a liberal no matter what party he or she is in.

[Delphinium]

If you can discredit the messinger...

[Delphinium]

by lascivious, libidinous, licentious, dangerous, reprobative behavior. That you revel in such past days, proves that you still haven;t reached a level of maturity.

Are you talkng about Rudy, or us?

I think you forgot who your candidate is?

Omalley, I think she needs some of your meds:)

[OMalley]

Well im sorry you feel that way, really.

I wasnt referring to you specifically as calling anyone a religious zealot, it was general-if you took the time to read my post.

It wouldnt have mattered in the least, if you didnt have any simular stories to tell. you could have shared anything about your life. thats what the thread was about. maybe you missed that.

Thats a whole slew of big nasty words. just because we can laugh at ourselves and not beat ourselves up over past events shows we have grown up. but thats a matter of opinion.

Calm down, relax-ive never accused you of drinking while posting. and if its untrue, why would it matter at all to you?

I think someone just needs a big hug:-)

[OMalley]

no way, im NOT sharing-besides it might be confused as being lude or dangerous. i have a reputation to uphold LOL

[dmw]

You know, let's just for a moment say that everything you say is correct regarding the anti-Rudy comments. Yes, some anti-Rudy people have said some harsh things, some that I personally disagree with as well. What I don't understand is this, why do you allow what anyone *says* determine who you are going to support and vote for? It is childish to allow people's words, regardless how hateful, mean, rude, they are to determine how you are going to vote. You are voting for Rudy (according to what you said) for reasons that have nothing to do with Rudy's position on any of the issues. If you want to support Rudy and vote for him, by all means do so. But don't do it for the reasons you stated.

It is just silly to say you are going to vote for him because of what people on this forum said to you or someone else. Why cut your nose off to spite your face? If you can't see that, fine, do what you gotta do, but don't expect conservatives on this forum to blow kisses to you and wish you luck--we won't. Rudy may get nominated, but he will not win the election, because we "purists", "religious fanatics", "extremists", "narrow minded fools", as your side calls us, will not vote for a liberal republican. By they way, there's been people on your side who have been just as vicious in name calling as well. Your side certainly can't claim moral superiority in that department.

I want to address the comments you made about serving your country. I did not disrespect you as a person who served their country. You are mixing things up here and one has nothing to do with the other. Are you saying that because you served your country honorably that you are immune from being criticized on this forum? I think it is unreasonable to think that you cannot be criticized or disrespected for having a opinion about something, especially supporting a liberal republican, which by the way, over 60% of the people on this forum do not support. I am confident that you are respected by every person on this forum for your service to your country. I am proud of you and respect you enormously for making a tremendous sacrifice to your country. But it is not fair, and it certainly is not honest, that you would bring your military service up and use it in this context. As I said, one has nothing to do with the other.

I think you went over the top when you compared a few people on FR to those who called you a baby killer 30 years ago. Not only are you taking things out of context, you are making a dishonest comparison. Talk about offending people, that is pretty offensive, and even hateful in my opinion. The people on FR are probably the ONLY people who would have never called you a baby killer had FR been in existence back at that time. And for you to compare some of these people on FR to those kooks who said such awful things to you back them, that's pretty cruel friend.

Support Rudy if you want, but I suggest you find a better reason to vote for Rudy than just saying you support him because a few people offended you with *words*. That's not a very convincing or persuasive argument if you ask me.

[youngjim]

Perhaps you'd like to do something on this forum besides nattering 'poor, poor, pitiful me" to any mope who will listen and answer Post 1577. She has a very interesting question posited: "Who is more pro-life? You and your pro-life talk or Pete Sessions and his pro-life walk? Hasn't he earned more respect from this site of all places than what he has been served up here?"

I let up on you on an earlier thread because I thought your head had exploded:

Delphinium: "I'll pray that God will give you understanding of the Word that you just preached to me"

Ok here's your chance to witness to the unbeliever. If Rudy is so evil, how could Pete Sessions endorse him? Extra credit if you don't need to call the santimony squad to answer for ya.

[youngjim]

calling out the sanctimony squad BUMP

[Delphinium]

Perhaps you'd like to do something on this forum besides nattering 'poor, poor, pitiful me" to any mope who will listen and answer Post 1577. She has a very interesting question posited: "Who is more pro-life? You and your pro-life talk or Pete Sessions and his pro-life walk? Hasn't he earned more respect from this site of all places than what he has been served up here?"

Don't know what you are talking about?

Delphinium: "I'll pray that God will give you understanding of the Word that you just preached to me"

This is the only part of the post I relate too. Yes I said it after you posted me some scripture that you had no understanding of.

ANYONE who supports a pro-abortion, (partial birth),Margaret sanger praisen liberal like Rudy has no understanding of Gods Word.

[Blue Collar Republican]

Hey youngjim,

Are you just having a bad day?

[nopardons]

I wouldn't have anything to say, to the likes of you.

And I've been "like this" all of my life; thank God! Good breeding always tells. ;^)

[youngjim]

Your prolix post equivocates "*words* with these particularly odious words "treasonous liberals."

That "your" side will not admit into evidence these words, shows your argument to be tendentious, intellectually dishonest, and a specious equivocation of the elements of the tort.

Now I'm not going to explain all of these big words to you, but until you stop framing the argument to prove your point (begging the question), you cannot have a civil debate on this matter.

[Delphinium]

Your mother acted like that too?