Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australia to ban old-style light bulbs
Associated Press ^ | 02/20/07 | ROHAN SULLIVAN

Posted on 02/20/2007 9:38:04 AM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Calpernia
Those fluorescent bulbs don't work in refrigerators, stoves or brooding and heat lamps.

I guess the Aussies can say goodbye to easybake ovens...

21 posted on 02/20/2007 9:54:06 AM PST by presidio9 (There is something wonderful about a country that produces a brave and humble man like Wesley Autrey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I keep trying to use compact flourescent bulbs in the house.
They keep sucking, so I keep going back to standard incandescents.
CFB's (or whatever the proper acronymn is) just don't have the right color, brightness, stability or warmth as incandescents - no matter what marketing keeps saying.


22 posted on 02/20/2007 9:54:37 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey
How about the millions of appliances that require incandescent light bulbs to operate?

From the fine article:

"Under the Australian plan, bulbs that do not comply with energy efficiency targets would be gradually banned from sale. Exemptions may apply for special needs such as medical lighting and oven lights. "

Let's see how they deal with the increased mercury in their landfills in 20 years.

23 posted on 02/20/2007 9:57:03 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

California and NJ have this same goofy bulb idea on the table.


24 posted on 02/20/2007 9:57:48 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Patrick1
*****you will have to buy twice as many bulbs or stronger ones to get the same amount of light.******

No, no offense, but not true.

Fluorescent lamps (bulbs) emit considerably more Lumens (light) per watt than incandescent (tungsten) bulbs.

26 posted on 02/20/2007 10:01:33 AM PST by Condor51 (Rudy makes John Kerry look like a 'Right Wing Extremist'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Using more energy efficient products isn't a bad thing--whether global warming does or doesn't exist.

Australia should make more nuclear reactors--their country has the largest uranium reserves in the world.

27 posted on 02/20/2007 10:03:28 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: null and void

http://www.nema.org/lamprecycle/epafactsheet-cfl.pdf

An interesting analysis- CFLs contain 4mg of Hg each, but may reduce Hg emissions to the environment overall by reducing the amount of coal burned.

I'll need a lot more data before I can comment on the truth of that, but it sounds intersting.


28 posted on 02/20/2007 10:04:10 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: farlander

Electrical lights burn up a lot of money. I only buy compact flourescents now. They do a great job for 1/4 the energy burn. CFLs are pretty cheap now, too.

Motion detector switches help too. I use those outdoors, due to crime and our border security (thanks Bush).

We had a sound activated switch for the garage door once. When we approached the house and activated the garage door, the light went on. Then it went off later. Kids loved opening the door to the garage and shouting, turning on the light. We donated that switch to our niece and nephew.


29 posted on 02/20/2007 10:04:34 AM PST by sine_nomine (The United States...shall protect each of them against invasion. Article IV, 4. US Constition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

30 posted on 02/20/2007 10:04:58 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Australia has a very low population density. In part, that is because they live on the driest continent, and one that isn't particularly nutrient rich for plants (and therefore for livestock eating those plants).


31 posted on 02/20/2007 10:06:07 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Think of the electricity that could be saved if we'd just go back to burning whale fat. Environmentalism is the opposite of progress.


32 posted on 02/20/2007 10:06:55 AM PST by Jaysun (I've never paid for sex in my life. And that's really pissed off a lot of prostitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

At least the driest, generally inhabited continent--Antarctica could be drier, but few people stay there, and it's debatable whether people actually live there.


33 posted on 02/20/2007 10:07:06 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

see:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1787770/posts


34 posted on 02/20/2007 10:09:03 AM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

"Think of the electricity that could be saved if we'd just go back to burning whale fat."

Or from liposuction....


35 posted on 02/20/2007 10:10:17 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

The whale fat from all the whales in the world would probably not meet global energy needs for lighting, along with needlessly causing the extinction of an animal.


36 posted on 02/20/2007 10:10:26 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Rats, already posted so many comments here.


37 posted on 02/20/2007 10:11:31 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: xcamel


Are you the FR hall monitor today?


38 posted on 02/20/2007 10:11:38 AM PST by presidio9 (There is something wonderful about a country that produces a brave and humble man like Wesley Autrey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
No one would have to be if people would do something as simple as:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;s=bulbs

39 posted on 02/20/2007 10:13:42 AM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: xcamel; presidio9

presidio9's article is AP; the other one is Reuters. Plus the other one is about ten hours old, and already has plenty of comments.


40 posted on 02/20/2007 10:15:37 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson