It's worth noting that for all of this silly nonsense about how "tough" Rudy Giuliani would be against terrorism, the simple truth is that he has a well-documented track record of disgracefully opposing the most effective means of protection Americans have against the kind of "terrorism" they are most likely to encounter in their lives -- i.e., a couple of homosexual Muslims driving around the D.C. suburbs shooting people at random, some loser Muslim from Bosnia randomly shooting people in a Salt Lake City shopping mall, an Iranian-born @sshole driving his car onto a crowded sidewalk in North Carolina, a Palestinian-born malcontent shooting people on the observation deck of the Empire State Building (right in Rudy Giuliani's own New York City!), etc.
In the aftermath of the last incident on that list, Giuliani stood up and used the attack not to call for Americans to protect themselves from this kind of crap, but to promote his anti-gun agenda.
'Tough on terrorism," my @ss.
I'll look around later, but if you have any links hand to actual statements by Rudy re gun control after the incident I'd like to see them. There's no question in my mind what President G's reaction to the Utah shooting would be. The guns fault, not the shooter.
The guy was a Muslim alien. Is that who you want to give guns to? That was Giuliani's comment - that Ali Abu Kamal had circumvented a 90 day in country residency requirement.
In the aftermath of the last incident on that list, Giuliani stood up and used the attack not to call for Americans to protect themselves from this kind of crap, but to promote his anti-gun agenda.
'Tough on terrorism,' my @ss."
Worth repeating.... Thank you.
I'm guessing passing another "gun law" would be Rudy's answer to pretty much everything.