Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy Guliani Opts Out of Religious Broadcasters MeetingIs Rudy Going to Ignore Evangelicals?
Associated Content ^ | February 16, 2007 | Jeff Musall

Posted on 02/18/2007 8:00:38 AM PST by WalterSkinner

With the bare fact being that no Republican in recent memory has been able to win a major contest without at least the tacit backing of the religious right, Rudy Guliani might be trying to buck that trend.

(Excerpt) Read more at associatedcontent.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: christians; electionpresident; elections; evangelicals; giuliani; religion; rino; rudy; rudy2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-364 next last
To: WalterSkinner
Image and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPic
241 posted on 02/18/2007 3:50:27 PM PST by Fawn (LEMME IN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkMIdfwo32Y&eurl=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands


Ok, then if he's the nominee, I will be happy to "sin."
LOL-LOL-LOL


242 posted on 02/18/2007 3:51:54 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; All

Excuse me .. "clueless" .. I don't think so.

I think you're on the wrong thread! I'm talking about politics and you're talking about childhood games and spooks and monsters and garbage stuff like that.

Why don't you go over to the GAMING websites .. because you are definitely CLUELESS about politics!!


243 posted on 02/18/2007 3:54:18 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt; ecurbh
Here, this better for ya?

Either...

1) you forgot your sarcasm tag, or

2) you really are ~clueless~ because you didn't follow ~that~ conversation very well at all.

244 posted on 02/18/2007 3:58:34 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (http://www.virginiaisforrudy.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood; All

If you don't know the difference between Rudy and Hillary .. then you are voting for Hillary and you hate Rudy and can't bear the thought of him running against her.

How about that ..??

You're a fake non-supporter of Rudy - which makes you a supporter of Hillary. And .. I'm confident Hillary is terrified that Rudy will be the nominee .. and that's why all these threads on FR are so violently against him.

And .. after 8 years of that disgusting nightmare of a presidency .. even a clueless game player could figure out Hillary is not a good choice.


245 posted on 02/18/2007 3:58:36 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; All

And .. you have proven what I said was true .. you are a child and clueless about politics.

Good bye!!


246 posted on 02/18/2007 4:00:16 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
And .. you have proven what I said was true .. you are a child and clueless about politics.

He said as he stomped off in a temper tantrum...

247 posted on 02/18/2007 4:02:32 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (http://www.virginiaisforrudy.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
248 posted on 02/18/2007 4:09:39 PM PST by Fawn (LEMME IN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkMIdfwo32Y&eurl=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt; SeaBiscuit; BlackbirdSST; Spiff; Liz
you hate Rudy and can't...

Typical leftist tactic, call those in opposition to liberalism "haters."

Anyone who thinks Mrs. Clinton is the be all, end all of the '08 election has already conceded defeat...

The only way the Left can win is to undermine conservatives in the Republican primary.

I receive no benefit from the same things just because they have different Madison Avenue designer labels.

I might has well vote for Bullwinkle, there isn't a dime's worth of difference between them.

249 posted on 02/18/2007 4:51:28 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim
As one evangelical Christian, I am fully behind Giuliani.

Conservative evangelicals have put too much faith in politics and government to address the social problems of this country. Maybe it's time to put our emphasis where we can do the most good -- in our communities, in our churches, and in our families. What has 25 years of evangelical political activism produced? Little, from what I can see. I will still vote my convictions (which are informed by my faith), but it's also my conviction that the social issues of greatest concern to evangelicals will be resolved in the courts, not in Congress. Twelve years of Republican control of congress produced exactly what for us evangelicals?

250 posted on 02/18/2007 4:51:39 PM PST by My2Cents ("I support the right-ward most candidate who has a legitimate chance to win." -- W.F. Buckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: inkling
I don't know any Evangelicals who care about Pat Robertson's political pronouncements.

For what it's worth, Robertson has said in the past that Giuliani would make a pretty good president.

251 posted on 02/18/2007 4:52:58 PM PST by My2Cents ("I support the right-ward most candidate who has a legitimate chance to win." -- W.F. Buckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

252 posted on 02/18/2007 4:53:14 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Well .. that's your opinion and you're stuck with it.

If Rudy gets the nomination (which is not guaranteed at this point), please be my guest and don't vote for him. Then .. you'll have the joys of Hillary for President. Won't that be just lovely ..??


253 posted on 02/18/2007 4:53:48 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner; All

How many people on this thread who are belly-aching about this are even evangelical Christians?


254 posted on 02/18/2007 4:54:08 PM PST by My2Cents ("I support the right-ward most candidate who has a legitimate chance to win." -- W.F. Buckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim

War on terror? Where is that on your list of priority issues?


255 posted on 02/18/2007 4:55:31 PM PST by My2Cents ("I support the right-ward most candidate who has a legitimate chance to win." -- W.F. Buckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
...be my guest and don't vote for him. Then .. you'll have the joys of Hillary for President. Won't that be just lovely ..??

Same thing... different Madison Avenue designer label made in China or by illegals in the USA...

256 posted on 02/18/2007 4:56:45 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
All I hear people saying is AGAINST, AGAINST, AGAINST .. nobody's FOR a candidate

There is a large contingent of Freepers who frankly don't seem to support anyone. They're too disgruntled and angry with the world to care, I guess.

257 posted on 02/18/2007 4:57:25 PM PST by My2Cents ("I support the right-ward most candidate who has a legitimate chance to win." -- W.F. Buckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot
Liberalism MUST BE DEFEATED!

________________________________________________

This from the guy who describes himself on his FR profile as "somewhat liberal on social issues...hopelessly liberal on immigration"

258 posted on 02/18/2007 5:01:42 PM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: PatrickF4

If Republican voters do not back Rudy or whoever the nominee is in the general, then said 'Republicans' are electing a radical socialist criminal back to the White House. Let's all back our candidates in the primary and see how things shake out. Whoever the nominee is has my vote for sure. There is not going to be any legitimate 3rd party candidate.


259 posted on 02/18/2007 5:07:39 PM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Well .. quite frankly .. I don't think they're "FReepers" at all .. just disgruntled disruptors!

They remind me a lot of the McCainiacs or the GoPatGo crowds from 2000.


260 posted on 02/18/2007 5:09:08 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-364 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson