Skip to comments.
The 17 Republicans Who Voted For Defeat In Iraq
Sweetness & Light ^
| February 17, 2007
| N/A
Posted on 02/16/2007 3:07:04 PM PST by Sam Hill
The 17 Republicans who voted against our soldiers and against victory in Iraq:
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Disapproving of the decision of the president announced on 10 January 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), that:
1. Congress and the American people will continue to support and protect the members of the United States Armed Forces who are serving or who have served bravely and honorably in Iraq; and
2. Congress disapproves of the decision of President George W Bush announced on 10 January 10 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq.
Representative Michael Castle (DE)
Phone: (202) 225-4165
Fax: (202) 225-2291
Email
Representative Howard Coble (NC)
Phone: (202) 225-3065
Fax: (202) 225-8611
Email
Representative Thomas M. Davis (VA)
Phone: (202) 225-1492
Fax: (202) 225-3071
Email
Representative Tom Davis (VA)
Phone: (202) 225-1492
Fax: (202) 225-3071
Email
Representative John J. Duncan Jr. (TN)
Phone: (202) 225-5435
Fax: (202) 225-6440
Email
Representative Philip Sheridan English (PA)
Phone: (202) 225-5406
Fax: (202) 225-3103
Email
Representative Wayne Gilchrest (MD)
Phone: (202) 225-5311
Fax: (202) 225-0254
Email
Representative Robert Inglis (SC)
Phone: (202) 225-6030
Fax: (202) 226-1177
Email
Representative Timothy V. Johnson (IL)
Phone: (202) 225-2371
Fax: (202) 226-0791
Email
Representative Walter Jones (NC)
Phone: (202) 225-3415
Fax: (202) 225-3286
Email
Representative Richard Keller (FL)
Phone: (202) 225-2176
Fax: (202) 225-0999
Email
Representative Mark Kirk (IL)
Phone: (202) 225-4835
Fax: (202) 225-0837
Email
Representative Steven C. LaTourette (OH)
Phone: (202) 225-5731
Fax: (202) 325-3307
Email
Representative Ronald Ernest Paul (TX)
Phone: (202) 225-2831
Email
Representative Thomas Petri (WI)
Tel: (202) 225-2476
Fax: (202) 225-2356
Email
Representative James Ramstad (MN)
Phone: (202) 225-2871
Fax: (202) 225-6351
Email
Representative Frederick Stephen Upton (MI)
Phone: (202) 225-3761
Fax: (202) 225-4986
Email
Representative James T. Walsh (NY)
Phone: (202) 225-3701
Fax: (202) 225-4042
Email
Remember them.
Only two Democrats stood with our country and our soldiers in Iraq:
Representative Jim Marshall (GA)
Phone: (202) 225-6531
Fax: (202) 225-3013
Email
Representative Gene Taylor (MS)
Phone: (202) 225-5772
Fax: (202) 225-7074
Email
The other 229 (and 17 Republicans) stood with the terrorists.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: congress; iraq; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-196 next last
To: RightWhale
Don Young was a firebrand this afternoon.
81
posted on
02/16/2007 4:44:39 PM PST
by
xmission
(Dont isn't a strategy, Freedom isn't Free, Dems encourage our enemy,)
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
This is an important thread... Please take note of these 17 idiots and contact them!
82
posted on
02/16/2007 4:45:41 PM PST
by
nutmeg
(National Security trumps everything else.)
To: HitmanLV
I agree that the media had depicted Iraq poorly, but the admin has done a terrible job in communicating the good news, too. Plenty of responsibility to go around.
I'm with you there.
83
posted on
02/16/2007 4:46:02 PM PST
by
xmission
(Dont isn't a strategy, Freedom isn't Free, Dems encourage our enemy,)
To: Mr. Jeeves
he does it out of a deeply held conviction that fixing the world's problems is none of our business. Battling terrorists over there instead of here is none of our business?
To: All
I should mention that I posted Rep. Tom Davis' info twice:
Representative Tom Davis (VA)
Phone: (202) 225-1492
Fax: (202) 225-3071
Email
He's the same as Tom M. Davis.
Sorry about that.
85
posted on
02/16/2007 4:47:36 PM PST
by
Sam Hill
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
Consider signing the NRSC Pledge... link in #34.
86
posted on
02/16/2007 4:48:26 PM PST
by
nutmeg
(National Security trumps everything else.)
To: HitmanLV
"I'd like to think you're right, but I think in terms of popular support for the war in Iraq, the public has lost its patience and confidence in the admin."
91% of the Pubs in and he has lost support? Are you working for the enemy now too? You are helping them blow this out of proportion.
87
posted on
02/16/2007 4:49:24 PM PST
by
Earthdweller
(All reality is based on faith in something.)
To: Earthdweller
I think he's talking about "The public, not the republicans".
88
posted on
02/16/2007 4:51:16 PM PST
by
xmission
(Dont isn't a strategy, Freedom isn't Free, Dems encourage our enemy,)
To: xmission
The majority of the sanity party came out intact on this......
Don't let the trolls on this thread tell you otherwise.
89
posted on
02/16/2007 4:52:11 PM PST
by
Earthdweller
(All reality is based on faith in something.)
To: Earthdweller
No, I am speaking in terms of the general public perception, and the constituencies of all those who voted for the resolution.
90
posted on
02/16/2007 4:52:30 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
("I mean, that's a storybook, man!")
To: xmission
I know what he is talking about and the Dems were never for us anyway..so the MSM has done a terrible job of convincing anyone new...this is a joke.
91
posted on
02/16/2007 4:53:31 PM PST
by
Earthdweller
(All reality is based on faith in something.)
To: xmission
"... I saw hillary get the words to the Star Spangled Banner slightly wrong..."
Yeah, but you EXPECT a treasonous member of the fifth column to not know the anthem! Sort of like witches not being able to say the Lord's Prayer.
To: Earthdweller
I know that they did, but the ones who didn't need to be flogged. There is no more important issue to the future of the world, then the WOT (Ok, so it's the WAR ON RADICAL ISLAM).
93
posted on
02/16/2007 4:54:32 PM PST
by
xmission
(Dont isn't a strategy, Freedom isn't Free, Dems encourage our enemy,)
To: HitmanLV
You and the MSM picked up very few new takers even with 24/7 slamming of the war effort. I'd say that was a pretty piss poor campaign.
94
posted on
02/16/2007 4:55:12 PM PST
by
Earthdweller
(All reality is based on faith in something.)
To: Earthdweller
so the MSM has done a terrible job of convincing anyone new...
I disagree. Even Michelle Malkin was starting to feel down about our progress because of the intense barrage of bad news hit pieces. She got to go to Iraq, and check it out herself. She came back feeling better.
Most folks don't have that luxury, and many of those who might have been on the WOT (in Iraq) side to begin with, are tiring of this. They only see the death and destruction.
95
posted on
02/16/2007 4:59:01 PM PST
by
xmission
(Dont isn't a strategy, Freedom isn't Free, Dems encourage our enemy,)
To: RebelTex
I will not contribute to any Republican senator who voted for the resolution. Further, if any Republican senator who votes for such a resolution is a candidate for re-election in 2008, I will not contribute to the National Republican Senatorial Committee unless the Chairman of that Committee, Senator Ensign, commits in writing that none of the funds of the NRSC will go to support the re-election of any senator supporting the non-binding resolution.THIS has already been my policy the past year or two.
Whenever a House GOP Committee or Senate Repub Committee person calls on the phone - I give that money grubber hell, telling them that I contribute ONLY to those individual Republicans who do not sell out our military in the War against Islamofascists.
Nor will I contribute to any generic Republican committee which gives money to anyone who fails to support a southern US-Mexico wall/fence.
I spend 10 minutes telling the money grubber why I will never again contribute to any generic Republican committee, I dont care HOW MUCH they are desperate for money.
96
posted on
02/16/2007 4:59:41 PM PST
by
Edit35
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Battling terrorists over there instead of here is none of our business? We're nation-building, in the hope that the resulting nation will be less friendly to terrorists than the preceding government was. Frankly, we could have handed Iraq over to the Arab League in 2003 and gotten about as good a result, since Saudi Arabia and Egypt have been tougher on Al Qaeda sympathizers in their own countries than we have with our own in the USA.
If we really want to battle terrorists over there, we would team up with India and overrun Pakistan.
97
posted on
02/16/2007 5:00:00 PM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: Earthdweller
Tell that to all the GOPers who got tossed out on their ass on election day, 2006.
That night amounted to a dramatic vote of no confidence in the president. We may not like it, but denial isn't a river in Egypt.
98
posted on
02/16/2007 5:02:08 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
("I mean, that's a storybook, man!")
To: JHead
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Actually, I would rather be battling the terrorists over here. We have some pretty stupid policies about importing muslims, and have done (probably) irreparable damage by the sheer number invited in. That is to say nothing of Bush throwing the door wide open for all the riff-raff on the southern border. It would be nice to think that fighting them over there will keep us safe over here. It is just not true. They are here. Bush is doing nothing to change that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-196 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson