Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Gospel according to Darwin
National Review Online ^ | February 12, 2007 1:30 PM | John G. West

Posted on 02/14/2007 2:07:15 PM PST by Tim Long

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-285 next last
To: dan1123
Evolutionists are so funny. They argue fervently for their religion while vehemently denying their religion exists.

It would probably make your head explode to learn that millions of devout Christians accept evolution as a valid scientific theory.

41 posted on 02/14/2007 2:57:05 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
People need to pick naturalism or supernaturalism.

Yes. The Rain is either natural (condensed water vapor), or supernatural (God made the rain). It can't possibly be both.

42 posted on 02/14/2007 2:57:18 PM PST by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

Are you an idiot? How can you belive the garbage you post? Is your world-view so fragile?


43 posted on 02/14/2007 2:57:56 PM PST by USMMA_83 (Tantra is my fetish ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CptRepublican
"Since the modern man has been around for 25000 years but where are the monkeys that are in the middle of evolution, half human half ape? Last time I checked there were not any talking monkeys around."

Based upon your scholarly work and careful study of evolutionary theory, could you kindly point out the part that suggests that modern apes (or monkeys as you call them) should be expected to evolve into humans? Nothing I have read or been taught has ever suggested that creatures leave successful niches unless there is a compelling force or untapped opportunity waiting to be exploited.

44 posted on 02/14/2007 2:58:06 PM PST by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

Oh, so you believe only Protestants go to Heaven then and all Catholics are going to Hell or am I wrong?


45 posted on 02/14/2007 2:58:31 PM PST by My GOP (Conservatives are realistic and pragmatic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: narby

There is intolerance of religion right here on FR, in most creation vs. evolution threads. There's one running right now. There are radical atheists who post on FR, saying things completely indistinguishable from what you would find on a leftist forum, and making statements just like those cited in the OP.


46 posted on 02/14/2007 2:59:10 PM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: narby

I've posted Dawkins' quotes in the past. Please don't make me look them up again. :>)


47 posted on 02/14/2007 2:59:27 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: microgood
Darwin's Day event has a anti-religious element to it, and that may be the primary motivation for holding this event.

Go to the source web site, www.darwinday.org, and show me where the anti-religious talk is. I'll be waiting for some kind of trash mouth writing like the two blogers John Edwards hired.

I'll be waiting.

48 posted on 02/14/2007 2:59:37 PM PST by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: narby

"I am intolerant of intolerance, and it's the creationists attacking science who are on the wrong side of this issue."

So does that make you intolerant? Sounds like it to me.

It's almost as good as "Darwin’s Greatest Discovery: Design without a Designer". By definition, this quote completely contradicts itself. A Design, by definition, requires a Designer.


49 posted on 02/14/2007 3:00:00 PM PST by scottdeus12 (Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: narby

***Then came the "creation science" movement in the 1980's, and my respect for Christianity started downhill.***

You made your choice live with it. What do you care about the church after letting your Christianity go down hill.



50 posted on 02/14/2007 3:00:28 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Who cares what Dawkins said? I disagree with Dawkins and will regardless of how many quotes of his you post.


51 posted on 02/14/2007 3:00:55 PM PST by My GOP (Conservatives are realistic and pragmatic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: narby
Then came the "creation science" movement in the 1980's, and my respect for Christianity started downhill.

I have to admit that I actively try hard not to disbelieve Christianity because of the deceitful "creation science" charlatans. I used to take their claims on trust alone...but when I started to look at them as a scientist--as critically as I examined other scientific claims--I realized how absurdly poor they were. I also realized there were obvious attempts to deceive non-scientists into believing the scientific evidence supported creationism. It seemed to conflict badly with the proscription of "bearing false witness."

Do the lies of creation scientists mean that creationism is false? No. But there sure isn't much evidence for it when you strip away the lies. :-(

52 posted on 02/14/2007 3:01:10 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USMMA_83
Are you an idiot? How can you belive the garbage you post? Is your world-view so fragile?

No. Are you? I'm not the one who believes an impossible religious view presented as science.

53 posted on 02/14/2007 3:01:33 PM PST by Tim Long (Two of my favorite creationists: Jesus Christ (Matthew 19:4) and Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

I happen to be a practicing Catholic and take it as a truth that Jesus, as a man, had the same common ancestry through evolution that we all have. Yes, the human Jesus was a product of evolution just as we all are.


54 posted on 02/14/2007 3:02:01 PM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: narby
I accept evolution, but I find this Darwin Day stuff pretty creepy. We don't have an "Einstein Day" or "Newton Day" or "Pauling Day" or "Watson and Crick" day. It just doesn't seem healthy to immortalize scientists the way we immortalize national or religious heroes.
55 posted on 02/14/2007 3:02:25 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
Only literate in nonsense.

So Republicans and conservatives don't want our votes. Ok. Fine.

The sad thing is that this junk was published in National Review. I didn't know they were a religious doctrine magazine.

56 posted on 02/14/2007 3:02:29 PM PST by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: narby

"When conservatives chase away people who are scientifically literate, do you think there will be enough creationists left to win a vote?"

Most of the dogmatic, fanatic evolutionists and people who bad-mouth Christians are on the Demonrat-leftist-Marxist side of the fence anyway.


57 posted on 02/14/2007 3:03:28 PM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
You're talking to the wrong person. Fiercely Protestant.

So creationists don't like Catholic voters either.

It will surely be President Hillary! then.

58 posted on 02/14/2007 3:04:53 PM PST by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

Jesus help...I'm off this thread...nothing but a bunch of hee-haws here....


59 posted on 02/14/2007 3:06:04 PM PST by USMMA_83 (Tantra is my fetish ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: My GOP; narby; Tim Long

Dawkins is a leading evolutionist, and he says that rational people realize that if a natural process like evolution is true, then there is no need for any God.

He boils it down to them versus us. If it's "A," then it cannot be "B."

I tend to agree with him. The God that emerges from theistic evolution is hardly a god, and is more a Star Trek master race.


60 posted on 02/14/2007 3:07:09 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson