Posted on 02/10/2007 6:38:25 AM PST by Sam Hill
Who is the DBM going to cover this weekend? Obama Lincoln's announcement, Rudy in California, AN Smith's death, or the Pantsuit in NH???
"...it was clearly intended to demonstrate support for going to the United Nations to put inspectors into Iraq."
Here is a short video where Hillary said weapons inspectors could not disarm Iraq and that she supported the President taking action Saddam Hussein:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb4RE7K6czI
Clinton is already synonymous with 'Liar'......
She will probably attempt to redefine the word 'voted' .....
She needs a mega dose of Prozac.
We've YET to find the hundreds of thousands of dead bodies that were supposedly killed, but Billy Jeff, with bottom lip quivering, told us that genocide was being committed and we had to stop it...and he wasn't lying, because Dumbocrats don't EVER lie to the American people.
Just one more example of their hypocrisy.
Walking Eagle was taught to lie by a pro.
General Petraeus is her greatest threat right now, and she knows it. Which is why she made a speech (where she buried the above statement for the benefit of the left wing), instead of putting questions to the General. The General's potential success is also why she cannot call for withdrawing financial support for the troops at this point.
Everyone knows she's a liar, but what bugs me is that she thinks we're all so damn stupid that we'll fall for it.
Key Vote
Use of Military Force Against Iraq
Bill Number: H J Res 114
Issue: Military Issues
Date: 10/11/2002
Sponsor:Rep Hastert, Dennis [IL-14]
Roll Call Number: 237
Joint Resolution Adopted (Senate)
How members voted:
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton voted YES. (BOOM! THERE IT IS!) *SMIRK*
Official Title of Legislation:
H J Res 114: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
Project Vote Smart's Synopsis:
Vote to adopt a joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
Highlights:
- Authorizes President to use United States Armed Forces against Iraq
- Requires President to report to Congress no later than 48 hours after military action has started with his determination that diplomatic efforts alone could not protect U.S. national security nor enforce United Nations resolutions regarding Iraq
- Requires President to submit a progress report to Congress every 60 days on matters relevant to this resolution
House Passage Vote: 10/10/2002: Passed: 296-133 (Roll No. 455)
Senate Passage Vote: 10/11/2002: Passed: 77-23. Record Vote Number: 237
Presidential Action: 10/16/2002: Signed by President. Became public law #107-243.
Last Updated: 02/03/2005
http://vote-smart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?vote_id=3201&can_id=WNY99268
And here's a link to how EVERYONE in the Senate voted on this issue:
http://vote-smart.org/issue_keyvote_member.php?vote_id=3201
The Washington Post reported yesterday that a Pentagon inspector general had found that intelligence provided by a former undersecretary of defense to buttress the White House case for the invasion included reporting of dubious quality or reliability that supported the political views of senior administration officials.
This unfortunately confirms what weve been discovering in the last three years, Clinton said, that the administration never intended to let the inspectors complete their work despite assurances to the contrary and that they gilded the lily on the intelligence they had.
Clinton said, If we had known then what we know now about both the allegations concerning Saddams intentions and capacity and about our own governments intentions, we would never have had a vote, and if there had been a vote, I certainly would never have voted to give the President authority, she said.
Never mind that the Washington Post has since admitted its mistake. The reporters of yesterdays article say this today:
Senators Debate Significance of Pentagon Report On Intelligence
An article in yesterdays Washington Post misattributed to the inspector generals report critical comments about the Pentagon operation made by committee Chairman Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.). In a statement he released Thursday, Levin, not the inspector general, said the Pentagon effort used intelligence reporting of dubious quality or reliability. [See correction, A2.]
But, as usual, Hillary was quick to embrace any lie that would make the US look bad.
She's starting to
"She does not "at this time" support a cut in funding for American troops in Iraq. She backs instead a cut in funding for Iraqi troops."
Like there's a difference. It says the same thing either way; 'I want Iraq to fall to the terrorists'
"FLIP-FLOP! FLIP-FLOP! FLIP-FLOP!"
(((self ping)))
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.