More Lies From Hillary Clinton About Her Iraq War Vote

Sweetness & Light ^ | February 10, 2007 | N/A

[Miss Didi]

Who is the DBM going to cover this weekend? Obama Lincoln's announcement, Rudy in California, AN Smith's death, or the Pantsuit in NH???

[faq]

"...it was clearly intended to demonstrate support for going to the United Nations to put inspectors into Iraq."

Here is a short video where Hillary said weapons inspectors could not disarm Iraq and that she supported the President taking action Saddam Hussein:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb4RE7K6czI

[wodinoneeye]

Clinton is already synonymous with 'Liar'......


She will probably attempt to redefine the word 'voted' .....

[ExTexasRedhead]

She needs a mega dose of Prozac.

[IrishRainy]

Is she going to apologize for her husband's administration, and therefore herself as well, for lying to us about the need to invade Kosovo?

We've YET to find the hundreds of thousands of dead bodies that were supposedly killed, but Billy Jeff, with bottom lip quivering, told us that genocide was being committed and we had to stop it...and he wasn't lying, because Dumbocrats don't EVER lie to the American people.

Just one more example of their hypocrisy.

[Piquaboy]

Walking Eagle was taught to lie by a pro.

[LZ_Bayonet]

At General Petraeus's Senate hearing, Hillary stated, "I disapprove of this policy. I think it is a dead end."

General Petraeus is her greatest threat right now, and she knows it. Which is why she made a speech (where she buried the above statement for the benefit of the left wing), instead of putting questions to the General. The General's potential success is also why she cannot call for withdrawing financial support for the troops at this point.

[yoe]

There is evidence that the "inspectors" were not reporting the facts……………Oil for Food comes to mind….cutting Kofi and gang some slack, not just there but in many areas. Hillary Clinton will cut and run as fast as she can leaving America, her allies, Iraq and Afghanistan to the ghouls that will enslave them once again. She will try to nationalize energy, taking profits for “common good while raising taxes to pay for more health entitlements, education entitlements and other ‘social reforms’ that are unconstitutional and remove the Electoral College. The United States Constitution nor the United States have no meaning for Missus Clinton the Marxist and she will rid the country of them. She, George Soros, and the MSM will buy the presidency as she could win in no other way.

SAVE AMERICA BY GETTING RID OF THE CLINTONS – WE ARE NOT SOCIALISTS – WE ARE A REPUBLIC AND AIM TO STAY THAT WAY.

NO TO HILLARY AND NO TO HER DISGRACED SPOUCE!!!

[hsalaw]

Everyone knows she's a liar, but what bugs me is that she thinks we're all so damn stupid that we'll fall for it.

[Constitutions Grandchild]

"For most Americans history begins when they wake up in the morning and listen to the TV.

Hillary and the MSM have over a year to rewrite history.

She knows that help from Hollywood, Academia, and all major media is coming, and is quite comfortable with her lies."

Exactly! The majority of Americans have the attention span of a gnat, and it doesn't matter how many degrees or offices are listed behind their names. They'd rather focus on Anna Nicole Smith (or parts of her, it seems), and will memorize the time, place and what they were doing when they heard the news of her death.

Hillary, on the other hand, will skate. It's good to be a plain-Jane because her opinions, statements, behavior will all fade into the homogeneous ooze of the nebulous. If she were a hot babe with a body to die for, America would remember every convoluted twist and turn in her life and every phase she uttered. Go figure.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

Key Vote
Use of Military Force Against Iraq

Bill Number: H J Res 114
Issue: Military Issues
Date: 10/11/2002
Sponsor:Rep Hastert, Dennis [IL-14]

Roll Call Number: 237
Joint Resolution Adopted (Senate)

How members voted:

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton voted YES. (BOOM! THERE IT IS!) *SMIRK*

Official Title of Legislation:

H J Res 114: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

Project Vote Smart's Synopsis:

Vote to adopt a joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

Highlights:

- Authorizes President to use United States Armed Forces against Iraq

- Requires President to report to Congress no later than 48 hours after military action has started with his determination that diplomatic efforts alone could not protect U.S. national security nor enforce United Nations resolutions regarding Iraq

- Requires President to submit a progress report to Congress every 60 days on matters relevant to this resolution

House Passage Vote: 10/10/2002: Passed: 296-133 (Roll No. 455)

Senate Passage Vote: 10/11/2002: Passed: 77-23. Record Vote Number: 237

Presidential Action: 10/16/2002: Signed by President. Became public law #107-243.

Last Updated: 02/03/2005

http://vote-smart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?vote_id=3201&can_id=WNY99268

And here's a link to how EVERYONE in the Senate voted on this issue:

http://vote-smart.org/issue_keyvote_member.php?vote_id=3201

[Churchillspirit]

All she is doing is giving her brainless followers something to hang their hats on.

[Sam Hill]

BTW, I edited out the last part of the Union Leader article. But it’s also typical of Hillary:

The Washington Post reported yesterday that a Pentagon inspector general had found that intelligence provided by a former undersecretary of defense to buttress the White House case for the invasion included “reporting of dubious quality or reliability” that supported the political views of senior administration officials.

“This unfortunately confirms what we’ve been discovering in the last three years,” Clinton said, “that the administration never intended to let the inspectors complete their work despite assurances to the contrary and that they gilded the lily on the intelligence they had.”

Clinton said, “If we had known then what we know now about both the allegations concerning Saddam’s intentions and capacity and about our own government’s intentions, we would never have had a vote, and if there had been a vote, I certainly would never have voted to give the President authority,” she said.

Never mind that the Washington Post has since admitted its mistake. The reporters of yesterday’s article say this today:

Senators Debate Significance of Pentagon Report On Intelligence

…An article in yesterday’s Washington Post misattributed to the inspector general’s report critical comments about the Pentagon operation made by committee Chairman Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.). In a statement he released Thursday, Levin, not the inspector general, said the Pentagon effort used intelligence reporting of “dubious quality or reliability.” [See correction, A2.]…

http://tinyurl.com/39xtla

But, as usual, Hillary was quick to embrace any lie that would make the US look bad.

[Salvation]

She sarting to

[Salvation]

That should have been:

She's starting to

[RWB Patriot]

"She does not "at this time" support a cut in funding for American troops in Iraq. She backs instead a cut in funding for Iraqi troops."

Like there's a difference. It says the same thing either way; 'I want Iraq to fall to the terrorists'

[beans36]

"FLIP-FLOP! FLIP-FLOP! FLIP-FLOP!"

[Christian4Bush]

(((self ping)))