Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women Shun 'The Man Who Has It All'
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 2-9-2007 | Roger Highfield

Posted on 02/08/2007 6:02:58 PM PST by blam

Women shun 'the man who has it all'

By Roger Highfield, Science Editor
Last Updated: 1:23am GMT 09/02/2007

Some men are just too good to be true, according to a study published today by psychologists.

Men who are good-looking, single, and earn a fortune are not as attractive as good-looking men who have an average kind of job, according to the research.

Simon Chu of the University of Central Lancashire and colleagues studied how women weigh up male physical attractiveness and socio-economic status when considering a long-term relationship.

They collected data from 186 female university students in the UK, with an average age of 23, asking them to look at personal ads of various men and rank them in terms of attractiveness as a long-term partner. Each advertisement showed a "mug shot" and provided basic information about his age, occupation and what he is seeking in a partner.

Images of the men ranged from those who were previously measured to be highly attractive, attractive and unattractive. Eighteen different occupations were also randomly assigned, from architect and company director to waiter, postman and gardener.

Surprisingly, researchers found that highly attractive men of medium status scored better than highly attractive men of high status.

The team, whose work is published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences, speculates that women perceive highly attractive men of increasing status to be less faithful and "too good to be true".


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: man; psychology; shun; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last

1 posted on 02/08/2007 6:03:07 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Simple. They want to mold someone they can control.


2 posted on 02/08/2007 6:04:14 PM PST by Defiant (Hillary 2008: Because America needs a nude erection, not an Obama Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

It is not possible to understand what "women" want.


3 posted on 02/08/2007 6:04:39 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
[looks around]

Nope, just here by myself.

4 posted on 02/08/2007 6:04:48 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

It is simple. They want security. Their idea of security, which does not always conform to reality or logic.


5 posted on 02/08/2007 6:08:00 PM PST by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Simple. They want to mold someone they can control.

Very true, and in terms of everything... ego, money, kids, and all manner of decisions.

6 posted on 02/08/2007 6:08:33 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator

No. They are all different and individual. There is no such thing as "women".


7 posted on 02/08/2007 6:09:52 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
They want to mold someone they can control.

Thats the job description of Jewish women and black women.

Little do those two groups of women realize how much they have in common.

8 posted on 02/08/2007 6:10:03 PM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Men who own a fortune don't seem to have a problem getting women.


9 posted on 02/08/2007 6:10:07 PM PST by SamAdams76 (I'm 40 days from outliving Steve Irwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Yup. Happy I like my own company .....
10 posted on 02/08/2007 6:10:37 PM PST by GoldCountryRedneck ("God made liquor and God made brew, so ugly people could have sex too" - unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

Agreed.


11 posted on 02/08/2007 6:10:50 PM PST by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

Sounds about right.


12 posted on 02/08/2007 6:11:13 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
A man with all that going for him is never going to want for female companionship. That takes away the coercive element from the relationship; the woman can't strongarm the man into a dependency. Women need to be NEEDED. Strong, successful men don't need them.

But some poor schlub that's just looking for a loving mate? HE'S a prime target for a bloodsucker. His faithfulness is his weakness.

13 posted on 02/08/2007 6:12:32 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Men who own a fortune don't seem to have a problem getting women getting laid.

That's better.

14 posted on 02/08/2007 6:13:00 PM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
Great looking + lots of money = The type of man most likely to cheat.
15 posted on 02/08/2007 6:13:34 PM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: everyone

I suspect this study is bunk. One way or another, they are missing something.


16 posted on 02/08/2007 6:13:58 PM PST by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
They're reading them like personal ads.

What does claiming a high income on a personal ad say about the man? (That he's full of...)

Income/expensive cars/clothes etc should never be mentioned to a prospective mate. If she is the type the really cares she will figure it out on her own. If you talk about it you just come off as an ass.

17 posted on 02/08/2007 6:14:17 PM PST by Dinsdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Or it's true in Britain, but not America.


18 posted on 02/08/2007 6:14:42 PM PST by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dinsdale

Yes. They should have looked at men who give subtle but clear indications of having money. Their findings would probably be different -- especially in the U.S.


19 posted on 02/08/2007 6:15:32 PM PST by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
Women need to be NEEDED.

That's an immaturity that she needs to transcend if she wants to find happiness. Sadly, too few manage it.

20 posted on 02/08/2007 6:16:34 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson