Posted on 02/04/2007 1:31:12 AM PST by Jim Robinson
I've long assumed that the Republican Party platform included pro-life, pro-family and pro 1st and 2nd amendment planks. Is this true or false? Or is the platform amended each election cycle to conform to the positions of the top polling potential presidential nominee (ie, the one with the most money or star billing and the MSM eye)?
If these planks are based on longstanding, sound conservative principles and are sincerely respected and upheld by the majority of the members, then I'd like to propose a motion that before being seriously considered by the official party powers that be, prospective nominees for the office of President of the United States must in the least demonstrate a solid history of being pro-life, pro-family and pro 1st and 2nd amendments, in addition to a solid history of abiding by and fighting for the other basic Republican planks, ie, national security, national defense, limited government, conservative spending, lower taxes, strict constructionist judges, local control of health, education and welfare, etc, etc.
Or is it too much to ask of the politician asking for our support for the highest office in the land to respect and abide by conservative principles and the basic planks of the party platform?
Or is there a movement underfoot to remove these planks from the platform?
Not too much to ask, but it certainly narrows it down.
Just off the top of my head, I'd say that just leaves...Dr. Tom Coburn! =O)
Log Cabin Republicans.
The home of mainstream gay, lesbian and STRAIGHT Republicans............
http://www.logcabinoc.org/
|
Giuliani | Clinton | Dem Platform | GOP Platform |
---|---|---|---|---|
Abortion on Demand | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Partial Birth Abortion | Supports Opposed NY ban |
Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Roe v. Wade | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Taxpayer Funded Abortions | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Embryonic Stem Cell Research | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Federal Marriage Amendment | Opposes | Opposes | Opposes Defined at state level |
Supports |
Gay Domestic Partnership/ Civil Unions |
Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Openly Gay Military | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Defense of Marriage Act | Opposes | Opposes | Opposes | Supports |
Amnesty for Illegal Aliens | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Special Path to Citizenship for Illegal Aliens |
Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Tough Penalties for Employers of Illegal Aliens |
Opposes | Opposes | Opposes | Supports |
Sanctuary Cities/ Ignoring Immigration Law |
Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Protecting 2nd Amendment | Opposes |
Opposes | Opposes Supports bans |
Supports |
Confiscating Guns | Supports Confiscated as mayor. Even bragged. |
Supports | Supports Supports bans |
Opposes |
'Assault' Weapons Ban | Supports | Supports | Supports | |
Frivolous Lawsuits Against Gun Makers |
Supports Filed One Himself |
Supports | Opposes | |
Gun Registration/Licenses | Supports | Supports | Opposes | |
War in Afghanistan | Supports | Supports Voted for it |
Supports | Supports |
War in Iraq | Supports | Supports Voted for it |
Supports Weak support |
Supports |
Patriot Act | Supports | Supports Voted for it 2001 & 2006 |
Opposes | Supports |
Freedom is about authority. Freedom is about the willingness of every single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion about what you do and how you do it.
Rudy Giuliani
Feb 1, 2007 Ann Coulter On Rudy Giuliani : "I Think He's The Only Republican Who Can't Beat Hillary."
We know everything we need to know.
Yes, especially when you use Ann Coulter as a reference.
Did someone buy you a new box of crayons?
You noticed. {{{BLUSH}}}
Thanks Spiff.
"A nation that values its privileges over its principles will soon lose both"
Dwight D. Eisenhower, inaugural address, 1953
If you cannot stand upon principle, then you can hardly expect others to do it for you. And if you abandon principle for the sake of convenience or 'practiciality,' then you can't complain about the results. Think of the message that you're sending.
What the Republican Party needs is a good, strong high-pressure enema to remove the 'progressive' RINO stools with which it seems to be impacted. Unfortunately, nothing short of a civil war will do the trick at this stage of the game.
Now, let me whack you with the truth stick. The GOP Platform is written and voted on at the GOP National Convention every 4 years. The platform committee does the writing and revising and approving. Quite often, there's a bit of contention as various factions of delegates at the convention fight over what should be added, deleted, or edited. The delegates are made up of people elected by their state parties to represent the state party members at the convention. I've been a delegate to the Arizona state GOP convention and voted on which delegates to send to the national convention. I was very careful to find out which delegates were pro-life and which were with the Democrats as being pro-abortion. I voted only for pro-life delegates because I knew that some of them were going to craft the GOP platform and all of them were going to vote on it.
So, the truth is that GOP Platform mostly represents the views of the actual grassroots members of the party. The Republican Party executive leadership and a number of the more prominent elected Republicans enjoy ignoring the platform - and therefore the majority of the party - because they don't feel beholden to that platform. It is a severe disconnect in the party that needs to be corrected.
Funny then how Giuliani supports Roe v. Wade, history's most tragic incident of liberal judical activism which has resulted in the murders of 45,000,000 American children.
When asked, his campaign said that this wasn't an oversight.
Dear deport,
Thanks for the update.
Kinda funny. First, it's an intentional judgment, now, it's an "omission."
Flip
flop.
;-)
sitetest
Yep, I's must be dotted and T's crossed....
Oh yea riiiight - that was Rudy's plan from the GetGo. The minute he saw the Conservative party -he planned to undermine it. GET REAL! He's done more for Republicans than any other who is running. Paranoia is not a very good trait for conservatives and its' becoming more and more rampant I'm sorry to say.
Good delivery with that 'truth stick'!
Oh, yeah, now Jim Robinson is PARANOID. You guys are not conservatives, not even close.
Ann Coulter is the paradigm conservative with impeccable, unquestioned conservative credentials.
When Ann Coulter says Giuliani Is The Only Republican Who Can't Beat Hillary...........better believe it.
Your bringing Jim Robinson into this is showing your acting like a crybaby. What are you trying to prove by mentioning his name? He has nothing to do with my conversation with you. If you are going to bring up Jim Robinson every time a person who likes Rudy posts then you guys are more of baby than I thought. GROW UP! I didn't mention him. I have more respect for him than that to bring him up every time I disagree with someone. I consider myself Republican. I vote Republican not conservative.
and your strategy to get rid of Roe is what?
nominate a conservative who does not have enough reach and appeal to win the general election, and Hillary's SCOTUS will guarantee Roe is law until 2040.
Oh and another thing. I didn't plan on coming on this thread but I was pinged by hydroshock (a freeper who happens to hate Rudy) to this thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.