1 posted on
02/02/2007 4:52:14 PM PST by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
02/02/2007 4:52:38 PM PST by
blam
To: blam
A study of the oldest known sample of human DNA in the Americas suggests that humans arrived in the New World relatively recently, around 15,000 years ago.
The report fails to reveal they came through the porous Mexican border.
3 posted on
02/02/2007 4:55:13 PM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: blam
4 posted on
02/02/2007 4:55:44 PM PST by
GOP Poet
To: blam
A study of the oldest known sample of human DNA in the Americas suggests that humans arrived in the New World relatively recently, around 15,000 years ago. Finally, a clue as to the identity of the schmuck that started glo-bull warming.
6 posted on
02/02/2007 4:58:35 PM PST by
LasVegasMac
(Islam........not fit for human consumption.)
To: blam
I'm really confused by the article:
Either the rate of mutation was much faster than generally accepted, OR, the author is stuck on a 15,000 year time line and assumes that it is evolution/mutation that varied (greatly) and not his concept of when the human record bagan in the Americas.
The rest of the piece seems merely to brag about the importance of his line of inquiry.
When the results are perfectly ambiguous, I'm not too sure about the value of the inquiry.
Wrong?
16 posted on
02/02/2007 6:02:04 PM PST by
norton
To: blam
This makes sense. They liked the west coast, surfing, the parties on the beach, the laid-back lifestyle. Why cross mountains and deserts to get to where? Tornado Alley?
To: blam
only one percent of modern tribal members have genetic patterns that matched the prehistoric sampleSo where did these people go and where did the modern tribes come from? They weren't related, it seems.
21 posted on
02/02/2007 7:04:06 PM PST by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
28 posted on
02/02/2007 10:35:16 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Wednesday, January 31, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
29 posted on
02/02/2007 10:35:57 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Wednesday, January 31, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: blam
33 posted on
02/02/2007 11:57:00 PM PST by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: blam
First Americans Arrived RecentlyThisparticular Early American arrived maybe 15k years ago. They can't stanch the leakout by generalizing an admitted 15k years.
35 posted on
02/03/2007 4:57:28 AM PST by
ThanhPhero
(di hanh huong den La Vang)
41 posted on
06/30/2008 9:25:57 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson