To: Spktyr
There's an easy opt-out clause...Have you got a link? I'd like to read it :)
...and it appears to be a safe anti-carcinogen.
But it's not a panacea. And boys don't have to get it. Which is why I don't think it should be shoved down parents' throats.
11 posted on
02/02/2007 1:36:49 PM PST by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: mewzilla
And boys don't have to get it.It hasn't been tested in boys, yet. Once it has been, I'm certain it will become mandatory for them as well.
20 posted on
02/02/2007 1:40:23 PM PST by
CholeraJoe
(Spork weasels ain't afraid of nuthin' but running out of sardines.)
To: mewzilla
The cancer "vaccine" works by preventing HPV infection, right? HPV infection can lead to cancer of the cervix. So why not make boys take it at the same time that the girls take it? I would prefer just to eradicate the dang thing. Worked, almost, for smallpox and polio.
21 posted on
02/02/2007 1:40:33 PM PST by
DalcoTX
To: mewzilla
"Texas allows parents to opt out of inoculations by filing an affidavit stating that he or she objected to the vaccine for religious or philosophical reasons."
Also, boys don't get cervical cancer (check your anatomy knowledge!) If there was an inoculation against prostate cancer, I'm sure it'd be mandatory, too - would you be complaining that the girls didn't have to get that vaccination?
24 posted on
02/02/2007 1:41:48 PM PST by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: mewzilla
And boys don't have to get it. Which is why I don't think it should be shoved down parents' throats. That's probably because boys can't get cervical cancer.
32 posted on
02/02/2007 1:43:52 PM PST by
Dog Gone
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson