Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans 2008: Giuliani 29%, McCain 19% (Angus-Reid Poll)
angus-reid.com ^ | 2/2/2007 | Staff

Posted on 02/01/2007 8:06:02 PM PST by Dark Skies

Rudy Giuliani is holding on to the top spot among Republican Party sympathizers in the United States, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 29 per cent of respondents would support the former New York City mayor in a 2008 presidential primary.

Arizona senator John McCain is second with 19 per cent, followed by former House of Representatives speaker Newt Gingrich with 16 per cent, and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney with eight per cent. Support is lower for former Kansas senator Sam Brownback, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, and Nebraska senator Chuck Hagel.

On Jan. 29, Romney expressed his support for U.S. president George W. Bush’s recent decision to increase the number of troops in Iraq—without leaving his usually critic stance—saying, "I’m glad we’re seeing a change in strategy. I’m glad we’re adding to the mission of our military the protection of the safety of citizens in and around Baghdad. I don’t know how you could rebuild a country and an economy if your capital city is literally all covered by what we call a red zone. You know you’ve failed if you have a red zone. The conduct of our policy in Iraq has been fraught with a number of mistakes."

In American elections, candidates require 270 votes in the Electoral College to win the White House. In November 2004, Republican Bush earned a second term after securing 286 electoral votes from 31 states. Democratic nominee John Kerry received 252 electoral votes from 19 states and the District of Columbia.

Bush is ineligible for a third term in office. The next presidential election is scheduled for November 2008.

Polling Data

Republican Presidential Primary Contenders

Jan. 25

Jan. 18

Jan. 11

Rudy Giuliani

29%

30%

28%

John McCain

19%

22%

20%

Newt Gingrich

16%

12%

14%

Mitt Romney

8%

10%

8%

Sam Brownback

3%

--

--

Mike Huckabee

1%

2%

--

Chuck Hagel

1%

1%

--

Source: Rasmussen Reports
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 579 likely Republican voters, conducted from Jan. 22 to Jan. 25, 2007. Margin of error is 4 per cent.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008; gingrich; newt; rinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: AmeriBrit

Me too. LOL


61 posted on 02/01/2007 11:38:55 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan

Well, at least YOU get it. LOL


62 posted on 02/01/2007 11:41:49 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Rudy never struck me as being wonkish!...

Rudy strikes me as a can-do kind of guy, a can-do republican.


63 posted on 02/02/2007 2:06:22 AM PST by tkathy (Sectarian violence? Or genocidal racists? Which is a better description of islamists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
It seems like FReepers are divided into two very different categories: 1. Those who want to defeat Hilliary by supporting the candidate that has the best chance of doing so and, 2. those who want to remain pure ideologues and support someone who has no chance in hell of winning.

I'll go with Giuliani and a win.

64 posted on 02/02/2007 5:22:31 AM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: deport

The FAV/UNFAV on Rudy might be a new record I don't know but it is up there, that has staying power because everything about Rudy had been out there for some time, I would personally be surprised if there is anything major we haven't already seen, but the anti Rudies will have no trouble rehashing old news, that's politics!

To me I don't think Newt wants to run, this cycle getting in next Sept I think would be too late to the game, maybe he sees some kind of multi self destructs coming down the road, I just think it is bad strategery.


65 posted on 02/02/2007 6:18:16 AM PST by JimFreedom (Rudy may annoy you. Hillary will get you killed.- MadIvan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

I guess that would make him a negative '-'!


66 posted on 02/02/2007 6:21:09 AM PST by JimFreedom (Rudy may annoy you. Hillary will get you killed.- MadIvan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

I think it's a significant indicator of the sampling they're doing. In other words, this poll is meaningless.


67 posted on 02/02/2007 6:24:00 AM PST by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: JimFreedom

To me I don't think Newt wants to run, this cycle getting in next Sept I think would be too late to the game, maybe he sees some kind of multi self destructs coming down the road, I just think it is bad strategery.



I don't think Newt is planning on entering the fray. Like you I think Sept 07 is about nine months late at best in entering the race. It takes time to set up state and national organizations, get the fundraising structure in place, and do all the myriad little things necessary to be a contender.

Personally I think Newt is selling books and looking for speaking engagements. Nothing wrong with that as we all have to make a living. He may also be trying to get hooked up with one of the other campaigns in an advisor role.


68 posted on 02/02/2007 6:35:18 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Chuck Hagel would cause me to vote for someone else.


69 posted on 02/02/2007 7:36:29 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

I'll go wih Rudy because I think he will be a helluva president. Period.

That he can beat Hillary is a necessary bonus.


70 posted on 02/02/2007 7:37:45 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: tkathy

That's how he comes across to me as well -- leader to comes to mind when I have heard him speak!


71 posted on 02/02/2007 9:36:00 AM PST by PhiKapMom (Broken Glass Republican -- Rudy/Newt -- Take back the House and Senate in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux
I hate to say it because I'm not a Giuliani supporter.

The same with me, but in a contest b/t RG and "her thighness", RG will likely win IMHO.

72 posted on 02/02/2007 9:37:45 AM PST by Smedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

That makes two of us!

I have yet to figure out the people that vote on principle and don't care if they win. If you don't win, you get nothing. Moral victories don't count in politics or in sports. As a big sports fan, I hate to lose but I hate to lose political races even more if that's possible.

Didn't take much for me to go to Rudy after the election because I want to grind Ms. Clinton into the ground with an avalance of votes so she and her hubby get a wake up call that they are through politically!


73 posted on 02/02/2007 9:40:43 AM PST by PhiKapMom (Broken Glass Republican -- Rudy/Newt -- Take back the House and Senate in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: deport

Newt I think is looking for VP!


74 posted on 02/02/2007 9:41:39 AM PST by PhiKapMom (Broken Glass Republican -- Rudy/Newt -- Take back the House and Senate in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

"What do the 2012 polls say?"

They point to an easy reelection for Rudy :)


75 posted on 02/02/2007 11:57:36 AM PST by My GOP (Conservatives are realistic and pragmatic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Politics are about GETTING ELECTED! Anyone who thinks otherwise is too dumb to vote.


76 posted on 02/02/2007 12:00:07 PM PST by tkathy (Sectarian violence? Or genocidal racists? Which is a better description of islamists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Maybe with Newt as VP that would appease the unappeasables. Besides, I think they would make a great governing team.


77 posted on 02/02/2007 12:06:32 PM PST by My GOP (Conservatives are realistic and pragmatic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
I'll go with Giuliani and a win.

Hilary lite is not a win for anyone but the left.

78 posted on 02/02/2007 2:56:51 PM PST by Marine Inspector (Customs & Border Protection Officer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I have yet to figure out the people that vote on principle

That's OK, we have yet to figure out you folks that have no principles!

79 posted on 02/02/2007 2:58:18 PM PST by Marine Inspector (Customs & Border Protection Officer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: tkathy

My sentiments exactly!


80 posted on 02/02/2007 4:28:11 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Broken Glass Republican -- Rudy/Newt -- Take back the House and Senate in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson