Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Advisers Offer Revised Iraq Plans {Zbigniew Brzezinski}
AP via SFGate ^ | 2/1/7 | BARRY SCHWEID

Posted on 02/01/2007 2:27:18 PM PST by SmithL

President Carter's national security adviser said Thursday the Iraq war was likely to lead to "a head-on conflict" with Iran and other parts of the Muslim world.

Zbigniew Brzezinski also told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that Bush administration policy was driven by "imperial hubris" and has proved to be a disaster on historic, strategic and moral grounds.

"If the United States continues to be bogged down in a protracted bloody involvement in Iraq, and I emphasize what I am about to say, the final destination on this downhill track is likely to be a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large," Brzezinski said.

Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser to Presidents Ford and George H.W. Bush, said a buildup of U.S. troops in Iraq "might be a positive blip" if it helped stabilize Baghdad. But he said it would not lead to fundamental changes in the situation.

"It is a tactic, not a strategy," he said.

Brzezinski set out as a plausible scenario for military collision: Iraq fails to meet benchmarks set by the U.S., followed by accusations that Iran is responsible for the failure and then a terrorist act or some provocation blamed on Iran. This scenario, he said, would play out with a defensive U.S. military action against Iran.

That, Brzezinski said, would plunge the United States into a quagmire that eventually would range across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Proposing a massive shift in policy, Brzezinski said the U.S. should announce with no ambiguity its determination to leave Iraq "in a reasonably short period of time."

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: carter; iran; zbigniewbrzezinski

1 posted on 02/01/2007 2:27:21 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

The Carter Administration is STILL enabling terrorism.


2 posted on 02/01/2007 2:28:34 PM PST by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
President Carter's national security adviser said Thursday the Iraq war was likely to lead to "a head-on conflict" with Iran and other parts of the Muslim world.

This from a guy too chicken to take on Iran when it should have been taken on.

3 posted on 02/01/2007 2:29:20 PM PST by dirtboy (Paris Hilton 08 - because name recognition is EVERYTHING! Duncan's not HOT enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Brezinski fails to forecast the outcome for his vision. It doesn't sound very good for any stability whatsoever.

It sounds like, step back and let the chaos ensue.


4 posted on 02/01/2007 2:30:07 PM PST by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
President Carter's national security adviser...

I stopped reading right there.

5 posted on 02/01/2007 2:30:47 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Glad Brzezinski is writing scenarios by which the USA fighting Iran is America's fault. I'm reminded of a Lex Luther quote from Superman II: "All this accumulated brainpower and these people can't figure out how to use a doorknob."

Do any of them EVER acknowledge that Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism, our sworn enemy, a nuclear threat, and killer of our troops - and that changing those facts should be a key objective?

Instead, the democrats are hell bent on PROTECTING Syria and Iran.

6 posted on 02/01/2007 2:32:25 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

President Carter's national security adviser



Enough said.


7 posted on 02/01/2007 2:39:19 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

perfect....

just do the opposite of his recommendations


8 posted on 02/01/2007 2:46:25 PM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; All
"likely to be a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large"

Brezinksi does not admit:

(1) that this "head-on conflict" between the U.S. and "much of the world of Islam" was in fact announced by many leaders in "much of the world of Islam" many years ago, even prior to Osama bin Laden's formal declarations of it,

and

(2) that the "head on conflict" between the U.S. and Iran was and remains a foundational principle of the regime in Tehran from its inception,

and therefore, he refuses to further acknowledge:

(3) that our activity in Iraq is in fact a delayed response to pre-existent "conflicts" declared against us - long preceding our activity in Iraq, and

(4) thus, our activity in Iraq is not a cause of either the "Muslim world's" or Iran's declared conflicts against us.

Which only further demonstrates why we are blessed that the Carter-Brezinski idiots are not in the White House today.

9 posted on 02/01/2007 3:19:09 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

If we'd wanted Carter's advisor, we wouldn't have shown Jimmy the door in humilating defeat.

And.. If we need advice on how to create more Iran's we can always ask him.


10 posted on 02/01/2007 3:22:10 PM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"The Carter Administration is STILL enabling terrorism."

Totally correct!

Brzezinski has a lot of nerve showing his face in public considering it was he which lead the Carter drive to allow Shi'ite fanatics to seize control of the Iranian government from the Shah. Since 1979 Iran's massive oil profits have been misused to bankrolled global jihad, including the murder of U.S. troops and Israelis.

Now this generation is stuck undoing the Islamic geostrategic nightmare that Brzezinski is absolutely & directly responsible for creating in the first place.

11 posted on 02/01/2007 3:48:39 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is Never Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
carter's NSA!!!

It's amazing. carter and his henchmen who undermined and destroyed the pro US, anti-islamist, moderate, Iranian government and ushered in the khomeinist murdering era, are at it again protecting the turbanhead mafioso-fascist thugs!!!

Absolutely amazing!!!
12 posted on 02/01/2007 5:07:08 PM PST by parisa (`1 Z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
If the United States continues to be bogged down in a protracted bloody involvement in Iraq, and I emphasize what I am about to say, the final destination on this downhill track is likely to be a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large," Brzezinski said.

If? We are in it already Bozo. And when you and the rest of the pansies have your way we will lose. Thank God for George W. Bush.

13 posted on 02/01/2007 5:50:31 PM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson