[JimFreedom]

No that was fine. I actually have probably the same 'values' package as you but I don't feel afraid of Rudy because I believe those social views belong in the states and a POTUS does not have much to say about them. This has been reiterated over and over on these threads.

I just have a real issue with people stating they would not vote for Rudy under any circumstances in which case you are voting for the Liberal and your conservative credentials are meaningless

I would certainly vote for Hunter. I would enjoy a RUDY/HUNTER ticket. I would vote for a HUNTER/RUDY as well.

[Fierce Allegiance]

I would certainly vote for Hunter. I would enjoy a RUDY/HUNTER ticket. I would vote for a HUNTER/RUDY as well.

I could go for that. I'd rather Hunter/Newt, but I would certainly vote for a H/G ticket. It won't happen, though, because hunter is a conservative, and rudy isn't.

[ElPatriota]

...I actually have probably the same 'values' package as you but I don't feel afraid of Rudy because I believe those social views belong in the states and a POTUS does not have much to say about them. This has been reiterated over and over on these threads...

Yes I know, I've seen that statement many times, but I don't agree with it... I don't need to write another pastoral, do I :)... Let me just say this, the POTUS is a ESPECIAL position, regarless of what he can or can't do in actuallity! He, his values, represent SOMETHING very important. I would want Guiliani and Romney serving in goverment in imporatant positions, but NOT as a president Why?... Oh boy... bla, bla, bla, and values I guess :)