Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brownback won't support Dems Iraq resolution (another backs away from political suicide)
MSNBC ^ | 1/25/2007 | AP

Posted on 01/25/2007 2:49:23 PM PST by tobyhill

WASHINGTON - Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback said Thursday he would not support a resolution drafted by Democrats opposing President Bush's Iraq plan, but he could back a rival proposal that contains less partisan language.

Brownback, among the first Republican lawmakers to publicly break with the president over a troop increase in Iraq, said the resolution approved this week by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is too divisive.

"I think what we ought to be discussing now as these resolutions move forward is what we should support, not what we're opposed to, and what we can pull together on, not what we're divided on," Brownback said during a conference call with reporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; senatorlaraza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: tobyhill
I too have been disappointed in the things he has said about the war and Bush administration. Of course, it's nothing compared to my Senators, Obama and Durbin. There is no point in calling or writing them on anything.
21 posted on 01/25/2007 3:03:52 PM PST by motherof 3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

The majority of the US Seante is acting like they are members of the City Council of Ithaca, NY or Bezerkely, CA or some other liberal urban hellhole.

At least when Ithaca passes a toothless antiwar resolution, it's understandable -- they are powerless freaks who have no real power.

But United States Senators acting like this? Placing President Bush on double-secret probation over a WAR????? Playing childish political games when we have troops serving and dying?

And did you hear that senile idiot SHEETS declare that he didn't understand how we forgot Vietnam when we blundered into the war? Didn't the distinguished gentleman VOTE to support going to war? Isn't he admitting he was clueless in 2003?

COWARDS!!


22 posted on 01/25/2007 3:04:34 PM PST by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Oh, this restores my faith in you, Mr. Brownback.

**rolling eyes**
23 posted on 01/25/2007 3:06:27 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (Every time a jihadist dies, an angel gets its wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

If we conclude nothing else from this, the recent wobbly stand on the War on Terror by Brownback demonstrates poor political judgment by a candidate entering the Republican Primaries. The Democrats can easily outmaneuver Brownback in a tough campaign in the general election if this is a representative example of his political IQ.


24 posted on 01/25/2007 3:06:31 PM PST by Unmarked Package (Amazing surprises await us under cover of a humble exterior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
He may have backed away from political suicide for now but he's still thinking about it. I just hope while he's still looking he remembers we're still looking at him. Anyone other than the usual RINOs sign any resolution it will be the last dollar the RNC sees from me.
25 posted on 01/25/2007 3:10:13 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Thank you for the link. I just signed.


26 posted on 01/25/2007 3:10:34 PM PST by The Blitherer (I am not worried about the deficit. It is big enough to take care of itself. -Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

It would have been suicide if Brownback had voted with the Dems. As it is, he's in a state of semi-suicide. Nobody who was looking will trust him again, and he's lost any small chance he had for the presidency, but at least if he keeps his nose to the grindstone he might get re-elected to the Senate again.


27 posted on 01/25/2007 3:11:33 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Okay, we all know the real reason why Brownback changed his mind, but let's look at it in a positive light. At least he did the right thing by not supporting the resolution.


28 posted on 01/25/2007 3:13:41 PM PST by The Blitherer (I am not worried about the deficit. It is big enough to take care of itself. -Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unmarked Package
If we conclude nothing else from this, the recent wobbly stand on the War on Terror by Brownback demonstrates poor political judgment by a candidate entering the Republican Primaries

Brownback has been proven unprincipaled and indecisive.

Another way of saying Brownback is dead meat.

29 posted on 01/25/2007 3:16:05 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Ah, more news from The Senator From La Raza...


30 posted on 01/25/2007 3:17:23 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer

He gets that credit for now but if he's really smart he'll stay away from any resolution that is intended to "send a message".


31 posted on 01/25/2007 3:20:44 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer

Thank you!!

Don't forget step #3: (the Democrats are much better than we are about these things)

What Can You Do?

1. Sign the Pledge

2. Contact your Senators and the Senate Republican leadership

3. Tell at least three friends about the Pledge


32 posted on 01/25/2007 3:24:18 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (We are going to win!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Unmarked Package

The way he acts is with his finger in the wind to see which way it is blowing.


33 posted on 01/25/2007 3:59:49 PM PST by gulfcoast6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I'm afraid you might be being to optimistic about Brownback.

I heard that he wanted the Warner (Repub) resolution that says they disagree with the President adding more troops and want him to "pursue all options and alternatives to reach the strategic goals ...".

NO I'M NOT KIDDING!

Somehow, they think that is a way to join the cut and run bandwagon and not call it that. Of course the enemy will understand and read the fine print too .....


34 posted on 01/25/2007 4:10:16 PM PST by Bush 100 Percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maximusaurelius

Mike Pence?


35 posted on 01/25/2007 4:11:35 PM PST by steel_resolve (Democrats are willfully and dangerously ignorant of the stakes in the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

Actually, the U.S. Senate is acting like the lives of our brave men and women are bills about tax reform or health care!

I heard that some of the Republican Senator had not signed onto the Dem or Warner resolutions because they were waiting to see if the threat of such resolutions would cause the President to "compromise".

YES - Compromise on a battle plan.

I can't believe it. I think the entire Senate has gone over the edge!


36 posted on 01/25/2007 4:14:25 PM PST by Bush 100 Percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav

HAHAHAHA! Love that graphic!


37 posted on 01/25/2007 4:14:55 PM PST by ShandaLear (Perfect People Need Support, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
WASHINGTON - Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback said Thursday he would not support a resolution drafted by Democrats opposing President Bush's Iraq plan, but he could back a rival proposal that contains less partisan language.

What about Warner's??

There should be NO resolutions .. especially in a time of war

38 posted on 01/25/2007 4:14:56 PM PST by Mo1 (Mrs. Bill Clinton - "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lormand
I was disappointed in George Allen,,,,, Duncan Hunter seems to be the man that true conservatives can support.
DUNCAN HUNTER 2008
39 posted on 01/25/2007 4:29:54 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrLee

Yup.... Duncan Hunter 2008 !!


40 posted on 01/25/2007 4:30:41 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson