Posted on 01/24/2007 10:56:10 AM PST by archy
Only the most far-out conspiracy theorists believe in scenarios like Hunt's. But in a new memoir, "American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate & Beyond," due out in April, Hunt, 88, writes: "Having Kennedy liquidated, thus elevating himself to the presidency without having to work for it himself, could have been a very tempting and logical move on Johnson's part.
"LBJ had the money and the connections to manipulate the scenario in Dallas and is on record as having convinced JFK to make the appearance in the first place. He further tried unsuccessfully to engineer the passengers of each vehicle, trying to get his good buddy, Gov. [John] Connolly, to ride with him instead of in JFK's car - where . . . he would have been out of danger."
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Some from in front, some from behind.
Charles McCarry, a former CIA agent, casts the extended Diem family as the perps in revenge for the JFK/RFK ordered assassination/coup of President Diem.
That was a great book.
"Clouds? More like a tornado. Your boy is a nut. Oswald killed Kennedy, read that whole site."
***
I stand corrected re: Prouty.
_____
Good, I've had one person here "see the light", looks like another hundred or so to go.
Oswald killed Kennedy, the case has been solved for a long time, delve into the conspiracy theories ONLY for great, fun, paranoid reading material.
____ No, you believe the *conclusions*, not the evidence.
Evidence is what it is. It is the *conclusions* that are *drawn* from the evidence that are 'believed' or not and those go both ways.
But, your choice of words to conflate evidence and conclusions are common when one wants to make their case seem stronger than it really is.
Or maybe OJ really didn't do it.
You know what I'm saying
____ Dan, are you an expert on the ACTUAL evidence?? Those who have gone in depth and don't have a book/documentary/tv series/special to sell believe Oswald killed Kennedy.
The most logical conculsion is that Oswald killed Kennedy, WHICH conspiracy theory has been proven????? Look how many HERE believe ONE of the many "theories". Which "theory" has been meticulously proven-I'll tell you, the Oswald one, NO others.
As for OJ, to anyone with half a brain, there was a mountain of evidence leaving no doubt OJ was the killer, just like there is a mountain of evidence on Oswald. Still, many people believe OJ is innocent, same with Oswald. You know what I'm saying Yes, I know what you're saying, better than you do. You're parroting things that you haven't really researched and taking at face value.
Here's an experiment for you:
Try and prove ANY of the conspiracy theories with the wealth of information out there.
Then, try and prove Oswald did it with the mountains of evidence about him.
The difference is staggering.
This has been blown up and destroyed already.
The "magic bullet"--When the jump seat is properly positioned as it was in Dallas that day shows that the trajectory and wounds from the bullet line up EXACTLY with a bullet fired from Oswald's perch in the School Book Depository.
If you would like to not believe the SCIENCE and PHYSICS used to prove it, believe away.
The "Magic Bullet" pictured here IS NOT the "magic bullet!!!!!"
A pristine bullet placed next to the ACTUAL "magic bullet" shows plenty of damage done to the bullet, consistent with the damage it did.
HIGH TREASON is a load of crap.
I dont think you know a damn thing about weapons.Bolt action rifle,that many shots, that fast,out of wack scope? Not a chance in hell.
___
All myths disproven a number of times, more proof that many here have not looked at ALL the evidence. Jeeezzz
As I heard it, after he signed it, he said, "Well, there goes the South."
Dan,
Once again you are startlingly and fabulously wrong on everything you say here. I can't even begin.
In hindsight---ie, seeing that Kennedy was successfully assassinated and no one is PERFECTLY certain Oswald did it alone---one can overlay any combination of circumstances, and any possible perpetrators, with no more perfect certainty than the Warren Commission had, and have a satisfying, seamless composition.
However, if you presented the plan to Fidel/the KGB/the mob/LBJ in 1963, and said it all hinged on everything going perfectly and the keystone player of it all was this psycho-spazzolian Oswald...Fidel, Yuri, Sam and Lyndon would have beat the living crap out of you for insulting their intelligence.
Then they'd have beat some out of the clerk who scheduled your appointment.
And of that one CAN be certain.
Years ago, when Tom Foley was speaker of the house, I pulled up to a stop light...and there was the third most powerful person in the country sitting in a car right next to me. Now, when there was some kind of huge event, he always showed up with a bit of an entourage, so I just sort of assumed that he always traveled like that...but no...he and another guy, chit chatting in the SUV next to me.
While the President has an entourage, and we're much more careful since the Kennedy assassination, President's are still very vulnerable. When Nixon was running for reelection, he flew into our small town on AF1. Almost the entire town went out to meet him. There was no special security of any kind to get onto the tarmac. First come, first serve. He shook folks hands along the half inch rope line that protected him from us. He had an SS detail, but that's it. A lone crackpot could have done terrible damage.
I've always thought this hyper-conspiracy stuff is just a hedge to help us "feel" that our leaders and our country aren't nearly as vulnerable as they are. They are basically sitting ducks. Despite how it might look in the movies.
The Diem's certainly had some interesting connections, but unfortunately for them, they were mostly with Kennedy-favoured state department types.
When the Vietnamese LLDB/ Special Forces and airborne officers jumped in on the coup plot along with support from the French Unione Corse [Corsican Mafia, as in *French Connection*/heroin] the die was cast.
General Duong Van Minh, General Le Van Kim, unknown LLDB Colonel, General Tran Van Don, on the Anniversary of the Republic of Vietnam, October 26th, 1963, 5 days before the coup d'etat.
Glad to be of service to you. :-)
Thank you Dan.
Now if you can whip me up a good Eggs Benedict I would be eternally grateful, I wish it was an option for dinner where there are some real chefs in the kitchen.
You are confusing the momentum of the center of mass with the momentum of the individual fragements. The center of mass will move forward, but not all the individual fragments have to.
But look at post 280. The head moves forward immediately after being hit, putting to rest any claims that JFK was shot from the front because his head went back. I went forward before it went back.
I don't dispute Johnson's sleaze factor; he was a politican after all. I just dispute that he murdered a sitting president.
Yeah, and Jackies head moves forward too.
Who shot her?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.