Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putting Sandy Berger to the test (He refuses to take court ordered Lie Detector)
Michelle.Malkin.com ^ | 1/23/07 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 01/23/2007 9:53:28 AM PST by teddyballgame

As the FNC story points out, the document-filching Clinton aide did agree to take a polygraph test as part of a plea deal reached in September 2005. Now, some GOP lawmakers want to know why the Justice Department won't follow through:

The Justice Department should administer a polygraph test to former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger to find out what documents he took from the National Archives in 2002 and 2003, Rep. Tom Davis wrote in a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales dated Monday. Davis, ranking Republican on the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, is leading a group of 18 lawmakers who say the Justice Department has been "remarkably incurious" about Berger's decision to remove documents relating to the Sept. 11 commission's inquiry into his role in helping prevent terror attacks during the Clinton administration.

"It is extraordinarily important that the Justice Department avail itself of its rights under the plea agreement and administer a polygraph examination to Mr. Berger to question him about the extent of his thievery.

(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: abledanger; berger; sandyberger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: steve-b
The physiological indicators that supposedly indicate lying simply do not arise in habitual liars (Clinton could tell you that day is night and not tweak the needle) and can be turned on and off at will with a little understanding of how the magic machine works.

And I don't doubt that one of the prerequisites for admission to the Clinton inner-circle is the ability to effortlessly spout bald-faced lies. There is no way on God's green earth that the Clintonistas would permit someone with a conscience to enter the collective. The next time you have the misfortune of hearing a Lani Davis interview, you'll see what I mean.

61 posted on 01/26/2007 5:25:07 AM PST by COBOL2Java ("No stronger retrograde force exists in the world" - Winston Churchill on Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame

Waterboarding would be better.


62 posted on 01/26/2007 5:28:03 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
"A man of honor would step up "

Well, that lets Berger out.

Carolyn

63 posted on 01/26/2007 5:31:29 AM PST by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon
Justice dept is a joke too... really pathetic.

You mean the Just Us Department?

64 posted on 01/26/2007 5:36:28 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Put him through the Jack Bauer test.


65 posted on 01/26/2007 5:40:02 AM PST by grammarman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
True.

(That said, there is a valid point that if Berger agreed to take a lie detector, or stand on his head while whistling "Yankee Doodle", or write a naughty sonnet about Bill Clinton and the Oval Office sink, he ought to keep his commitment regardless of whether any of those acts actually bring the truth any closer to light.)

66 posted on 01/26/2007 9:47:43 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame

Brooklyn reference:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1773636/posts?page=127#127

thru

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1773636/posts?page=132#132


67 posted on 01/26/2007 4:52:30 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson