Posted on 01/22/2007 6:18:03 PM PST by gobucks
BAGHDAD - Fatima Ali was a 24-year-old divorcee with no high school diploma and no job. Shawket al-Rubae was a 34-year-old Shiite sheik with a pregnant wife who, he said, could not have sex with him.
Ali wanted someone to take care of her. Rubae wanted a companion.
They met one afternoon in May at the house he shares with his wife, in the room where he accepts visitors seeking his religious counsel. He had a proposal. Would Ali be his temporary wife? He would pay her 5,000 Iraqi dinars upfront — about $4 — in addition to her monthly expenses. About twice a week over the next eight months, he would summon her to a house he would rent.
The negotiations took an hour and ended with an unwritten agreement, the couple recalled. Thus began their "mutaa," or enjoyment marriage, a temporary union believed by Shiite Muslims to be sanctioned by Islamic law.
The Shiite practice began 1,400 years ago, in what is now Iraq and other parts of the region, as a way to provide for war widows. Banned by President Saddam Hussein's Sunni-led government, it has regained popularity since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq brought the majority Shiites to power, said clerics, women's rights activists and mutaa spouses.
Opponents of mutaa, most of them Sunni Arabs, say it is less about religious freedom and more about economic exploitation. Thousands of men are dying in the sectarian violence that has followed the invasion, leaving behind widows who must fend for themselves. Many young men are out of work and prefer temporary over permanent wives who require long-term financial commitments. In a mutaa arrangement, the woman is entitled to payment only for the duration of the marriage.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
And who supports the children of these 'enjoyment' marriages? I've never heard of a more selfish setup in my life. Hideous idea, these rentawives, they're nothing more than pay-wives. You've heard of pay-telephones? They're pay-wives, kind of like the Johnny Chung subway. Yet these Shiites are the very puritans who call the West decadent.
Sounds good to me.
That's a lot less than they get for essentially the same kind of arrangement over here.
As my seven term County District Attorney so eloquently puts it, "we all pay for sex."
Prostitution by any other name is still prostitution. And here I thought that such things didn’t happen in the “pure” religion of Islam … silly me.
This is a big practice among the Shi'ites of Iran.
lipstick and perls on a pig..
It's still prostitution.
Translation: Modesty of women must be preserved and protected above all things!
......until the guy wants a warm place to put it.
Placemarking, expecting some interesting replies to this thread.
I think they've just reinvented the disco generation.
Wouldn't surprise me that this arrangement is common among Muslim men in the West with wives back in the homeland.
Ain't that the truth, for men. After my divorce, I estimated the total marital sex, divided that into what the divorce cost me, and concluded that I should have clearly used pay-as-you-go.
Slot machine girls...deposit coins here, pull handle and hope for three cherries.
Yeah, me too.
Compared to that, these women get a good deal, at least they get paid, and probably can break the "contract" if the so called "man" beats them.
Of course I don't imagine being party to such an arrangement does much for the woman's possibility of a more permanent type arrangement. Maybe as wife #4 or something.
Four dollars up front. How generous of this "sheikh."
I have a single co-worker that spends a lot of time in Brazil. He told me that he doesn't pay women for sex...he pays them to leave after sex.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.