Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Hires E-Campaign Expert (PATRICK RUFFINI!)
Washigton Post ^ | 1/22/07

Posted on 01/22/2007 12:41:15 PM PST by areafiftyone

Giuliani Hires E-Campaign Expert

As Dan Balz and I wrote in today's Post, presidential candidates on both sides are focused heavily on bolstering their Internet presence through a variety of new tools, including video, podcasts and even online video chats.

To brainstorm and implement these new innovations, the campaigns are chasing after a small group of people in their 20s and early 30s versed in the language of the new media.

One of the real "gets" on the GOP side of that world is Patrick Ruffini, who served as the Web master of President Bush's 2004 reelection campaign and then served in a similar role at the Republican National Committee. Ruffini gained recognition in national Republican circles for his blog, which was one of the first serious attempts on the Republican side at building an online community.

Ruffini has signed on with former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign as an e-campaign adviser. The hiring is only the latest sign that Giuliani is serious about a run for national office in 2008.

In building a national staff, Giuliani has recruited a number of former Bush operatives to his cause -- the latest being Brent Seaborn, who will be the director of strategy for the campaign. Seaborn was intimately involved in the microtargeting efforts credited with growing the number of Republican votes for Bush in 2004. Seaborn was a co-founder of TargetPoint Consulting, which specialized in microtargeting and data mining.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: giuliani; trojanhorse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-211 next last
To: areafiftyone
Freepers who support Liberals are disgusting.
141 posted on 01/22/2007 2:46:55 PM PST by Afronaut (Press 2 for English - Thanks Mr. President !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
"As far as judges, didn't he say he wants strict constructionists?"

Yes he did, but is that an argument you can use with gun owners to convince them that all the anti-gun speeches he has made didn't express his views?
142 posted on 01/22/2007 2:47:16 PM PST by Beagle8U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Oh, and I'm sure some were signed on BEFORE the poll.

Can you believe that a freeper doesn't think that Romney, Giuliani, Clinton, Edwards, etc. have sent any of their supporters to this web site. I think I'm going to bash my head against the wall.

How could they not know this?


143 posted on 01/22/2007 2:52:58 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Thet're either lying or they're in denial.


144 posted on 01/22/2007 2:55:53 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky, close friend of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

As I recall, Rudy believes that gun control, of whatever stripe, should be the responsibility of the states, not the federal government.


145 posted on 01/22/2007 2:57:45 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

Seems to me that some of the NRA-types on FR are going off half-cocked (if you'll excuse the pun) regarding Rudy's view on guns.


146 posted on 01/22/2007 3:00:00 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Thanks for posting. It's absurd for some on FR to say that "the base" will never support Rudy, when 69% of the members of FreeRepublic say they'll vote for Rudy over Hillary. All the talk about how "the base" (whoever "the base" is) will stay home is flat-out wrong, and that poll proves it.


147 posted on 01/22/2007 3:02:59 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Then there's the 30% who will stay home or vote third party and the 1% who will actually vote for EVIL. That's enough to help elect her.


148 posted on 01/22/2007 3:05:36 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: onyx

This is interesting.

The Unappeasables were saying that the majority of FR would not for Rudy. Not true.


149 posted on 01/22/2007 3:14:23 PM PST by BunnySlippers (SAY YES TO RUDY !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

It sure looked that way when the poll was posted, but of course, people "can" and do change their minds.


150 posted on 01/22/2007 3:18:14 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

See post #99. He thinks Ginsberg is a great Justice.


151 posted on 01/22/2007 3:18:53 PM PST by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

Yes WOT is important, but to me those issues are more important


152 posted on 01/22/2007 3:19:43 PM PST by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: merry10

I have not gone third party yet. At this time I am supporting Duncan Hunter. And there are others I like but not as well. But I can never support Rino Rudy.


153 posted on 01/22/2007 3:21:35 PM PST by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: onyx

31% of Freepers say they'll either sit it out, stay home, or vote for Hillary. But the percentage of the real "base" who will do that is probably only about 0.02% of the electorate. For all their huffing-and-puffing, I've never been convinced that the naysayers on FR represent more than an insignificant whiff among all voters...certainly not enough to sway an election.


154 posted on 01/22/2007 3:23:15 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: FreeInWV


FULL QUOTE


"That is not the critical factor. And what's important to me is to have a very intelligent, very honest, very good lawyer on the court. And he (Roberts) fits that category, in the same way Justice Ginsburg fit that category.

I mean, she was — she maybe came at it from a very different political background, very qualified lawyer, very smart person. Lots of Republicans supported her. I expect, and listening to Senator Nelson, I expect that John Roberts will get support from a lot of Democrats."


155 posted on 01/22/2007 3:24:34 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

If FR polls named the president, we might have President Buchanan, no?


156 posted on 01/22/2007 3:26:21 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: onyx

You mean the guy who got 0.5% of the vote in '00? Yeah, I see your point.


157 posted on 01/22/2007 3:28:59 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
There is real evidence that plays that thought out.

Many of those hard liners claim this election was lost because of the 'masses' of 'conservatives' who stayed home.
The statistics show that the base did show up at the polls in very strong numbers. They were very much in line with past elections.

We lost because of the independent/moderates who sided with the Democrats over the War and were swayed by the media.

A Moderate candidate will be the best possible choice for us to win in '08 who is currently a household word. It has to be that way or we lose.
158 posted on 01/22/2007 3:29:25 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Show me a 'true' Conservative and I'll show you someone with bad knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone; brf1; Blue Eyes; Princip. Conservative; trisham; stfassisi; guppas; goteasier; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on Pro-Life or Catholic threads.

I’m pro-choice. I’m pro-gay rights, Giuliani said. He was then asked whether he supports a ban on what critics call partial-birth abortions. “No, I have not supported that, and I don’t see my position on that changing,” he responded. Source: CNN.com, “Inside Politics” Dec 2, 1999 http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Rudy_Giuliani_Abortion.htm

ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES (November 14, 2006)

RUDY GIULIANI (R), FORMER MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY: I'm pro- choice. I'm pro-gay rights.

KING: Giuliani supports a woman's right to an abortion, and back in 1999, he opposed a federal ban on late-term abortions.

GIULIANI: No, I have not supported that, and I don't see my position on that changing.

KING: Immigration could be another presidential landmine. Back in 1996, Mayor Giuliani went to federal court to challenge new federal laws requiring the city to inform the federal government about illegal immigrants.

JEFFREY: He took the side of illegal immigrants in New York City against the Republican Congress.

KING: Giuliani opposes same-sex marriage but as mayor, he supported civil unions and extending health and other benefits to gay couples. He also supported the assault weapons ban and other gun control measures opposed by the National Rifle Association.

GIULIANI: I'm in favor of gun control. I'm pro-choice.

Republican Big-Wigs Support Pro-Abortion Event in NY

Pro-abortion Governor George Pataki and New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who also supports unrestricted abortion, are co-chairs of the 2000 Choice Award Presentation to be held on May 30 at the St. Regis Hotel in New York City. The event is sponsored by the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition, a group that is campaigning for the removal of the pro-life plank from the Republican National Platform.


http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200503010743.asp


159 posted on 01/22/2007 3:30:20 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Yes, that President Buchanan.


160 posted on 01/22/2007 3:31:00 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson