Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/20/2007 2:32:21 PM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: MindBender26

She could have gathered 2000 screaming, sigh waving supporters...
_________________________________________________________

"sigh waving supporters?"

I hope that was a typo. If it wasn't; I do not want to know!


153 posted on 01/20/2007 5:50:21 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26; Princip. Conservative; trisham; stfassisi; guppas; goteasier; Cailleach; Nevernow; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on Pro-Life or Catholic threads.

155 posted on 01/20/2007 5:52:21 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

I suspect a lot of people thought she announced two years ago.


157 posted on 01/20/2007 5:56:03 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

You are one of my favorite posters.She blinked:)


159 posted on 01/20/2007 6:02:51 PM PST by fatima (Thank you to all our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

I disagree on the timing issue. The 'stealth announcement' allows her to continue acting as if she's just New York's senator for another several months, while at the same time turning the fund raisers loose at full speed. She gets the advantage of being a candidate without the national-scale responsibility for her actions that a candidate would have. It's a classic Clinton move.


160 posted on 01/20/2007 6:13:12 PM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

It's January of 07, nothing that happens in this stage of the "campaign" (honestly there is no campaign yet, most Americans just aren't interested enough in politics to pay any attention to any campaiging 22 months before the election) matter at all. And everybody has been assuming she's going to run in 08 since she ran for Senator in 2000, so there's no reason for the announcement to be a big deal, all she's doing is confirming that 6 years worth of rumors are correct, BFD.


163 posted on 01/20/2007 6:49:31 PM PST by discostu (Feed her some hungry reggae, she'll love you twice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
Her announcement is consistent with what I see as her strategy for 2008, which is to open with a low profile; be noncontroversial; conversational and approachable, just one of the gals.

This opening is geared to do two things--hold her base of support from defecting to other candidates and most important, to neurtralize her sky-high negatives.

"Let's chat." How threatening is that? What could be more benign? In a week or two the media whores will be effervescing over "the New Hillary" a pleasant, well-spoken(fortune spent on speech lessons the last year or so), sensible security Mom who just wants to do what's right for America.

We won't be hearing too much about Bush after the initial gambit, because she will want to be inoffensive to all, plus, she knows full well that he won't be the issue by election time. She just has to pay her dues now to establish her bona fides to the party's hatemongers.

Hillary deliberately avoided making a splashy entrance. She intended fully to slip into the water quietly and start the long swim upstream to where people will say "Hey, she's not so bad. I think she's changed--mellowed--let's give her a chance."

Of course it will all be phoney as a three dollar bill but then so was Billyboy, and thanks to the blessings of mass democracy, our nitwit neighbors picked him to lead us for the duration.

164 posted on 01/20/2007 6:50:30 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
Interesting take. I thought her announcement was flat, but not disastrous.

Either way, it'll be long forgotten by the time the real action starts...

167 posted on 01/20/2007 7:24:10 PM PST by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
But... but.... Hillary is the "smartest woman in America" according to the left.

As Dennis Miller said, "she wrote in her autobiography that she didn't know Bill was cheating on her. You didn't know Hillary? I don't think you are smart enough to be my President."

168 posted on 01/20/2007 7:27:36 PM PST by Volunteer (Just so you know, I am ashamed the Dixie Chicks make records in Nashville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

I think she was doing this out of crisis managment. She is getting BURIED in announcements of others runing for president.

You also have Nancy Pelosi setting up a "shadow presidency" (ala parlementary style opposition party which shadows the sitting prime minister) with her superfluous committees and her PR stunt resolution to encourage the enemies of america. [democrats vote so americans die] Seriously, every vote by a democrat is a vote for blood letting.

I don't think it matters at all. Hilary clinton is a known quantity. Even if she did it in perfect announcement time, it would have been ignored.

This is for the competition. I bet there were other democrats thinking of running. This was the finger in the dyke. ( or is that vice versa?)


170 posted on 01/20/2007 7:36:03 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

She wants to "chat" - Lord help us!......


177 posted on 01/20/2007 9:08:55 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

And THAT is exactly what she wants you to think.

It is all staged so that she can make a GLORIOUS come back.


178 posted on 01/21/2007 4:29:21 AM PST by TaxRelief (Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

I totally agree with this analysis. What really ticks me off is when I hear Republican pundits on TV stating that she can win.


182 posted on 01/21/2007 7:04:04 AM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson