Posted on 01/16/2007 7:36:07 PM PST by kiriath_jearim
George W Bush yesterday said that the execution of Saddam Hussein bore the hallmarks of a sectarian "revenge killing", in his most critical assessment of the hanging of the former dictator.
The US President criticised the circumstances surrounding Saddam's death and the recent execution of two top aides, including Saddam's half brother, Barzan al-Tikriti, for their roles in the massacre of 148 Shia men in Dujail in 1982.
"I was disappointed and felt like they fumbled the – particularly the Saddam Hussein execution," Mr Bush said in an interview by public broadcast television's Jim Lehrer.
"The message is confusing. It basically says to people, 'Look, you conducted a trial and gave Saddam justice that he didn't give to others. But then, when it came to execute him, it looked like it was kind of a revenge killing."'
Bush at first welcomed the hanging of Saddam on December 30 for crimes against humanity as "an important milestone on Iraq's course to becoming a democracy", and declared "good riddance". He later said, however, that the execution should have been carried out "in a more dignified way".
An early official video appeared to show that Saddam's execution had been conducted with dignity. However, a leaked video taken by mobile phone later showed the deposed Iraqi leader, a Sunni, being taunted by Shia Muslims as he stood on the gallows with a noose around his neck. The trapdoor was opened before he had finished his prayers.
A government video of this Monday's execution of Barzan, Saddam's former intelligence chief, showed that the hangman's noose decapitated him, leading to claims by leaders of the Sunni minority in Iraq of deliberate mutilation.
Mr Bush said yesterday the hangings showed the Shia-dominated government of prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, charged by many with compounding the sectarian violence in Baghdad, "has still got some maturation to do".
He also admitted that he was "frustrated by progress" in Iraq. "A year ago, I felt pretty good about the situation. I felt like we were achieving our objective, which is a country that can govern, sustain, and defend itself. No question, 2006 was a lousy year for Iraq."
The comments came as it was revealed that Barzan had written to the United Nations pleading for his life before he was hung.
Barzan told Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary general, that he had "nothing to do" with the killings in Dujail for which he had been condemned to death.
"I request your interference to rescue my threatened life," he wrote, in a five page handwritten note circulated yesterday by one of his lawyers, Giovanni Di Stefano. He said most of the evidence against him bore "the signatures of others and were dated after I resigned from the government at the beginning of 1983."
Mr Di Stefano, who returned from Iraq on Sunday, said he had sent a letter to the International Criminal Court asking for a full investigation of the executions, which he claims were carried out illegally.
He said the hanging of Barzan and Awwad al-Bandar, the head of Saddam's judiciary, had not been authorised by Jalal Talabani, the Iraqi president, as required by Iraqi law.
"He could not sign them because he was in Syria. I think they were worried that he would commute the sentences if they waited for him to return. He has made his position clear that he was against the hangings," said Mr Di Stefano, who lodged a request for the sentence to be commuted on Boxing day.
He added that the two men had been rushed to execution in order to protect the names of several international companies who had sold chemicals to Iraq. He said he had evidence from the FBI centre in Qatar that companies in the UK, the US, Holland, France, Germany and Italy had sold chemicals which were later used in the Anfal campaign in which as many as 100,000 Kurds were killed. He said the naming of the companies would have been part of the defence strategy if Saddam and Barzan had lived to testify in the trial.
Sometimes justice IS revenge. Admittedly, the jeering was undignified and did not look as if the system of justice was impartial...but that's in an American's eyes.
I guess we shouldn't have killed him then, huh? He shouldn't have been punished for his crimes? Would lethal injection have been a better method? I guess you could even say there was no need to go to war: no WMD, Saddam wasn't really a brutal dictator who got what he deserved, the Iraqi people loved living under his rule.
Some people really disgust me. Right now, I cannot tell the difference between Bush, some people on FR and the Dummies...everyone seems to want to practice suttee and throw themselves on Saddam's casket while it burns in the fires of hell. I am more than happy to feed the flames.
Saddam got much less than he deserved. His death was dignified compared to the deaths his victims ever experienced. To deny that fact is utter hypocrisy and a slap in the face to all of the innocent civilians who were murdered by him. A real man would acknowledge it instead of crying over it, trying to appease the leftist PC crowd. It's obvious what trying to give dignified deaths to our enemies has done in Iraq. After all, that has been the tactic for the past few years, preventing our soliders from fully engaging and taking out the Islamofacists. Meanwhile, Americans are burned and hung (something in common with Saddam, gasp!) from a bridge, which is such a dignified way to die. I guess I shouldn't be at all fazed by the president's pussyfooting.
Mark.
WAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWA...Saddam was executed...WAWAWAWAWAWAWAWA
What else matters?
Ummm, no.
He went to trial and was found guilty, as he ought to have been. Then he was executed according to their own laws.
This was justice, not revenge.
That's the part that caught my eye also. How does that square with the "no weapons of mass destruction" caterwauling that we keep hearing?
I agree Saddam got less than he deserved. He rightfully should have been turned over to some of those he tortured and they could have taken him down to the woodworking shop and amused themselves for a while. Still, if the government was going to kill him, they should have done a dignified job. Bush is right.
"For Iraqis these days, that was dignified."
I'm curious - how many Iraqis do you know personally?
Or is your statement based on what you've learned from the MSM?
Yeah, revenge for trying to kill my daddy!
HA HA
Bush has lost his marbles, long after his Conservative principles...
If one of us had posted such a comment, we would have been accused of Bush bashing.
For Iraqis these days, that was dignified.
Headfirst through the shredder and into a pond of pig$hit would have been more appropriate.
"So when he was governor of Texas..."
So, you're saying that because he let the Texas courts administer justice (their job) without his meddling in it (not his job) that he is somehow guilty of revenge killing? That's quite a stretch, don't you think? Or do you favor the sort of activism that thwarts the will of the people?
Was that Sadr that slipped the noose around Saddam's neck?
How about getting on with the WOT and Iran. I'll hold the RESPECT until we win this damned war.
It's based on their current treatment of each other. Usually it's a group kidnapping, shot and bodies dumped somewhere.
1) Saddam looked like the only mature guy in the room; not good for him to go out on a high note.
2) It casts doubts on the credibility of the Iraqi government trying him in the first place. If they can not control the impartiality of the execution, then did they control the impartiality of the trial? By extention this reflects on us. We already have credibility issues in the Middle East, this is not helping
Anyway, even the best of us succumb to mockery and derision of those who are about to be executed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
