Posted on 01/10/2007 6:56:09 PM PST by mdittmar
I'm so used to hearing them immediately after the President's Saturday Radio Address,I just thought there might be one.
I got the impression that Durbin declared it won and that we need to leave now. It was an odd speech.
Democrat response: "We're losing in Iraq. Global warming. Bush sucks."
It was something like, waaaaaa, waaaaaa, sob, scared, US Bad, cut, US can't win, run, waaaaaa, poor Saddam, sniffle, waaaaa...
You mean you cannot predict what they will say????
It was truely strange. He went through a list of all the things we've accomplished, as though "this is what we did, we're done, let's go".
Like the Democrats want to take credit for all of the positive things that have happened in Iraq?
After that everything he's said simply had no credibility.
The fact the Dems picked this bottom-feeder to speak for them tells you what they are about and who they're going to target.
No problem...
"Yeah, Terrorists! Go! Fight! Win! Yipee!"
Could someone post the Democrat's response---
NO!!
Just kidding. I'm sure you already know what it is.
Don't mean to be rude, but who the f--- cares about the Dim response. I wouldn't want to soil my screen with a transcript of the seditious thing.
Really I thought he declared it lost and we need to leave now. Didn't he say we couldn't win it now?
PS-I hate the democrats.
Well he's partially right. I've said all along Bush blew it by not characterizing this effort correctly. The war IS over. It was over after we took over Iraq and ousted Hussein. I never understood why the administration kept calling this a war. Well I do - so they could continue to fund it because if the American people wouldn't fund an open-ended peacekeeping operation- but that's what this is.
Colin Powell said if we break it we fix it. Well it took a few weeks to break it and now years to try and fix it and its not fixed yet. In the future we may have to consider a policy of where we break it, pull out and make the locals fix it and then if terrorism pops up again we break it again. It seems to be easier to break things than to fix them.
(I'm not sure I fully support what I just posted here but part of me feels this way about it).
Wow! You captured it, word-for-word!
We have to break thing completly (Iran, Syria etc.) first. Fixing can be done afterwards. We should have attacked Iran in 2004.
I really really like how you put that!!!
Durbin's speech amounted to nothing more than psychobabble that we've been getting from the left for the last 4 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.