Skip to comments.
Troops Flee From Border Outpost(Unarmed National Guard)
The Washington Times ^
| January 6, 2007
| Jerry Seper
Posted on 01/06/2007 6:38:04 AM PST by kellynla
Armed men overran a National Guard observation post along the U.S.-Mexico border in Arizona this week, forcing the soldiers to retreat and prompting an investigation by the U.S. Border Patrol that has focused on the intruders' identity. No shots were exchanged and no one was injured in the incident, which occurred shortly after 11 p.m. on Wednesday. The National Guard troops were members of an entry-identification team, assigned to monitor major illegal-alien and drug-smuggling corridors. After forcing the soldiers to flee, the unidentified men retreated into Mexico. National Guard Sgt. Edward Balaban said the troops did not know how many men were involved in the attack "because obviously it took place in the dark." He said National Guard officials are investigating the incident and will determine shortly whether to change any procedures for troops at the border.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; border; illegals; immigrantlist; nationalguard; natlguarddisarmed; natlguardunarmed; unarmedpatrol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-112 next last
To: Basheva
We send National Guard troops to help the border patrol and defend the border - but we give them no powers to do anything and no weapons. Weapons they've got, powers they don't.
61
posted on
01/06/2007 10:11:18 AM PST
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
Reminds me of US Marines in Beruit, 1983. Same same.
62
posted on
01/06/2007 10:11:47 AM PST
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: El Gato
"change any procedures for troops at the border'
Now, I aint never been to Harvard, Princeton, or Yale, so I aint no genius Gump, but here is and idear:
How's about givin' our troops guns with bullets in them?
How about giving out Troops the power to call in an air strike or artillery? How's about a lil' help from a AC-130 Gunship? I've always said that napalm smells good in the morning or evening.
These people want to show force, I think we can play at that game.
63
posted on
01/06/2007 10:15:39 AM PST
by
do the dhue
(How come the Demorats have not fixed Iraq yet? They're inept!! Vote 'em out!!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
They test the will and if they see us running, they're going to become more emboldened and start opening fire or even outright invade. That could be interesting. As I understand it, the ROE does allow for returning fire. Might be good to get them a few more magazines of ammo though.
64
posted on
01/06/2007 10:15:42 AM PST
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: El Gato
returning fire
I'd drop a Daisy Cutter. Just to show the next fool what his fate will be.
65
posted on
01/06/2007 10:18:33 AM PST
by
do the dhue
(How come the Demorats have not fixed Iraq yet? They're inept!! Vote 'em out!!)
To: 3AngelaD
No, they weren't overrun, they had to RETREAT because guys with M-16s were approaching them You own quote says the NG had M-16s, not the intruders. The intruders reportedly had AKs. Just like in the Sandbox.
66
posted on
01/06/2007 10:20:25 AM PST
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: LowOiL
Bush sent them there unarmed... They were not unarmed. They just had stupid orders. You don't think they enjoyed retreating in the face of a small number of AK armed thugs do you?
I want to know who gave the order to retreat.
67
posted on
01/06/2007 10:22:55 AM PST
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: Farmer Dean
Send some Delta operators down there with open rules of engagement and see how many more times these druggies come across. No need for that, just get some western state guardsmen and turn 'em loose.
68
posted on
01/06/2007 10:25:30 AM PST
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: do the dhue
How's about givin' our troops guns with bullets in them? Those they've got. But are "strongly discouraged" from using them to say, Guard the country.
How about giving out Troops the power to call in an air strike or artillery? How's about a lil' help from a AC-130 Gunship? I've always said that napalm smells good in the morning or evening.
We destroyed all our Napalm some time ago, under Clinton IIRC, but maybe earlier. If the proper arrangement were made, they could have a flight or two of A-10s on call from nearby Davis-Monthan AFB at Tuscon.
69
posted on
01/06/2007 10:31:56 AM PST
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: El Gato
The article says that they were unarmed.
That means no weapons and/or ammo.
70
posted on
01/06/2007 10:37:53 AM PST
by
Basheva
To: yoe
That's just great! We send them to Iraq and allow them to defend themselves against insurgents. But they can't do the same here in the U.S.?
71
posted on
01/06/2007 10:42:08 AM PST
by
dvan
To: neodad
Thank God Pelosi's here. She'll fix this.Although I doubt she will fix it, Pelosi isn't the Commander in Chief that sent them there unarmed.
To: El Gato
The fate of several Marines in Iraq who have been accused of shooting enemy combatants and will be subjected to Star Chamber type proceedings by military courts may well be a factor in the actions of National Guardsmen on our southern border. Additionally, the 20 year sentences imposed on Border Patrol agents recently for actions against drug runners must also be considered. If fighting back will subject military and police officers to court martial and/or long prison terms, it is understandable that they will back down from confrontations.
Unless the conservatives in Congress and talk radio holler loud enough and forcefully enough on the hamstringing of the military and the Border Patrol, in both the Middle East and the border with Mexico, we will lose our influence overseas and maybe even American control of the Southwestern states in the long term. Limited war and measured responses failed in Korea and Vietnam. The elder President Bush restrained General Schwarzkopf from taking Baghdad at a time when our military capacity was greater than it is now, due to the Reagan buildup in 1991. Bush's reward for his restraint was an assassination attempt in 1993 sponsored by Saddam Hussein.
There is no substitute for victory.
To: WhiteGuy
This is absolutely terrible! Why doesn't Mexico implement Gun Control over there?
74
posted on
01/06/2007 10:59:30 AM PST
by
dvan
To: Gritty
75
posted on
01/06/2007 11:42:40 AM PST
by
Gritty
(What is going on is a sustained assault by Mexico on U.S. sovereignty - Mark Steyn)
To: LouAvul
76
posted on
01/06/2007 11:47:01 AM PST
by
Dustbunny
(The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
To: alloysteel
The National Guard was intentionally sent to the border without weapons at the readyThese particular guards DID have weapons, and permission to use them in necessity. They retreated, and called in nearby border patrol, because they were manning an observation post and were under orders not to be detected. Of course I realize that these facts don't fit the "let's remain in a constant state of xenophobic panic" template that has overtaken FR lately, and so will likely be ignored.
77
posted on
01/06/2007 12:30:43 PM PST
by
Stultis
To: El Gato
We need to start making napalm again then. I say call the AC-130s once and you will never have to call them again.
78
posted on
01/06/2007 12:33:41 PM PST
by
do the dhue
(How come the Demorats have not fixed Iraq yet? They're inept!! Vote 'em out!!)
To: TYVets; kellynla
Unarmed !They weren't unarmed. They had M-16s. You've succumbed to the "spin" created by kellynla (and by the W. Times reporter as well) in implicitly connecting unrelated quotes from the article. See the link post by Yoe in #12.
79
posted on
01/06/2007 12:36:17 PM PST
by
Stultis
To: HiJinx; All
I believe these troops were indeed carrying loaded M-16s. Rules of Engagement are such that they were not authorized to use their weapons under these circumstances. Thanks, HiJinx. There are contradictory reports going around on this. I'm going to go with your report, unless and until we learn differently.
I also understand, from a report that quoted a NG Major, that the NG calls in BP when they spot aliens but otherwise they are allowed to defend themselves. I would take that to mean they could return fire if fired upon.
80
posted on
01/06/2007 12:42:41 PM PST
by
La Enchiladita
(People get ready . . .)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson