Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/31/2006 3:10:04 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Lorianne

I have an ice fishing shanty, and could sublet the basement...


74 posted on 12/31/2006 4:21:34 PM PST by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

"800-square-foot house..."

They can kiss my skinny posterior. I grew up in a 900 sq ft house because my father banked every nickel he made, not because we were broke. That's 2 - 180 pounders, a 200 pounder, and my mother, who barely avoided getting crushed.

I WILL NOT live that way again unless I have to. I know that's all some can afford, but if you can afford larger and want it, see my first line as to my attitude to government mandated teensy houses. Commies.


76 posted on 12/31/2006 4:24:35 PM PST by Felis_irritable (Dirty_Felis_Irritable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Sustainability?

Even Patrick Moore admits that we have forests that are dying from too many trees. Let's cut some of them into lumber and build some houses that are large enough not to cause a divorcedue to claustrophobia.


83 posted on 12/31/2006 4:31:58 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Down in Portland, where narrow homes have emerged as an important and somewhat controversial form of entry-level housing, the city held a design competition for the “skinny house.”

No need for a design competition. They've had these for well over a century in the South and they're called "shotgun shacks". I think they look pretty cool, too.


92 posted on 12/31/2006 4:44:01 PM PST by SIDENET (Everybody was kung-fu fighting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
800 square feet?

After the author (and other enlightened progressives like her) live in this house for 5 years or longer, then perhaps I'd think about it.

Once again, the know-better-than-the-rest-of-us liberals are telling us how WE should live, while they (probably) continue to live in their mansions.

95 posted on 12/31/2006 4:50:16 PM PST by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I could buy more than that small house with the same amount of money he forked out for land and construction. And, it wouldn't be in someone's backyard! Oy.


99 posted on 12/31/2006 4:57:41 PM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I like small houses but there is always the problem of 'where do you put your stuff'? Don't say 'just have LESS stuff', girls NEED stuff, lots of stuff. So the solution is, have a small house but have HUGE closets! See how simple that was? ;9)


108 posted on 12/31/2006 6:01:45 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
It’s not the United States or Canada, but a more highly evolved combination of the two.

It's amazing how condescending the 'urban planning' people can be. If they want to live in tiny houses within spitting distance of their neighbors, and feel morally superior about it, that's fine for them. I prefer to have at least 40' between my house and my neighbors, and room inside the house to move around.

114 posted on 12/31/2006 6:17:56 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Unfortunately, all that fits is a laptop computer, portable TV, and this furniture ===


128 posted on 12/31/2006 7:56:20 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
I love these! Tumbleweed Houses
137 posted on 01/01/2007 1:32:13 AM PST by DietCoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne; Maynerd; Bobsvainbabblings; moneypenny; Kaylee Frye; Clintonfatigued; wallcrawlr; ...

WA State Ping...JFK


145 posted on 01/01/2007 1:35:55 PM PST by BADROTOFINGER (Life sucks. Get a helmet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Absent government influence, I believe that the size of homes being constructed would closely match the desires of the buying public. It seems to me that many developments, either through government requirements or neighborhood covenants, tend to set minimum house size standards. Now we have governments seeking ways to push smaller house construction instead. Why don't these controlling idiots just let the market determine house size?


148 posted on 01/01/2007 1:49:50 PM PST by meyer (Bring back the Contract with America and you'll bring back the Republican majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

They used to be called starter homes.


167 posted on 01/01/2007 3:25:31 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (All I want for Christmas is a new tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson