Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revenge of the Small (Smaller Houses Encourages in Pac NW)
Business Week ^ | December 26, 2006 | Karrie Jacobs

Posted on 12/31/2006 3:10:03 PM PST by Lorianne

Portland, Seattle, and Vancouver are creating strategies to encourage the development of modest, more affordable houses ___ In these three Pacific North­west cities, the progressive power of urban planning is taken very seriously, and concepts like livability and sustainability dominate the local civic culture to such an extent that to visit all three in rapid succession, as I did in October, is to drop in on another country. It’s not the United States or Canada, but a more highly evolved combination of the two.

In each city I was impressed by major developments, dramatic projects that promised to refresh the urban landscape in conspicuous ways.

It was in Seattle, however, where I saw the best small house. Dave Sarti, who co-taught a design-build studio at the University of Washington last year, had constructed an 800-square-foot house with a 160-square-foot double-height attached workshop. It’s a sweet fire-engine-red box planted in the backyard of a Central District home. I walked down the grassy driveway past an unremarkable blue traditional home and was surprised to see this Bauhaus cube where another yard might have a swing set.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; US: Oregon; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: govwatch; housing; landuse; propertyrights; realestate; zoning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-171 next last
To: DennisR
from the article:

"Sarti, however, bought someone’s backyard for $35,000 and built his house there for about $180,000"
101 posted on 12/31/2006 5:01:44 PM PST by stylin19a ("Klaatu Barada Nikto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ully2

"And wait until these urban planners see their little villages of ticky-tack going to seed in a few years. It will look like the government planned housing developments of the late 40's."

___________________________________________________________

You're a riot. Those government planned houses (saltbox capes) in the late 40's (in Milford CT) are now selling for
$275,000 + and are scooped up as starter homes as fast as they go on the market. The person who starts building these again on 1/4 acre lots in CT will be extremely wealthy within 2 years...even in a soft real estate market.


102 posted on 12/31/2006 5:06:12 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: riri
What you need is an open floor plan in the PUBLIC spaces, and a more conventional floor plan in the PRIVATE spaces.

Our old house worked extremely well, because it had no halls. It had a central staircase with one landing halfway up, which divided the house into public and private space. On the public side, the great room with a breakfast room and a kitchen separated by a half-wall, and a greenhouse room down half a flight. On the other side, the bedroom, the bath, and a buncha closet space. Downstairs, the basement with a garage and room for expansion. Eventually we added on a room for our first child on the opposite side of the half landing. That worked fine -- but the children kept coming and we had to sell!

103 posted on 12/31/2006 5:08:59 PM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

"The PAC NW is MAJOR volcanic hazard / earthquake country.
The less building there of all kinds, the better."

Better to build in Florida or the Eastern Seaboard? Opps, hurricanes.
California? More earthquakes, wildfires.
Perhaps The midwest or south? Tornados.
How about the mountain west? Not enough water.
New York or New England? Liberals.
That leaves North Dakota. Why is it loosing population?


104 posted on 12/31/2006 5:35:45 PM PST by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
where only the leader of the collective knows what's good for you.<<

and u can bet your A$$ they ain't living in 8oo s.f of house
105 posted on 12/31/2006 5:40:08 PM PST by M-cubed (Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
Just keep the bathrooms a little roomy, and you should turn out fine. I grew up in one of those 900sqft homes, and the bathroom is so **** small it's not even funny.

My master bath now has room for 2, and it's so much nicer.

106 posted on 12/31/2006 5:40:24 PM PST by Maigrey (This space reserved for Dianna. May there be peace for Derek.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
If you're a single guy, its still a good idea to buy more house than you think you need. You never know when a family might begin to fit into the picture. Then suddenly what looks like wasted space will be filled up sooner than you think.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

107 posted on 12/31/2006 5:55:32 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I like small houses but there is always the problem of 'where do you put your stuff'? Don't say 'just have LESS stuff', girls NEED stuff, lots of stuff. So the solution is, have a small house but have HUGE closets! See how simple that was? ;9)


108 posted on 12/31/2006 6:01:45 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
in many locations zoning doesn't allow you to build smaller even if you want to

That's exactly the problem. The planners who want to engage in social engineering run up against property owners who believe it's government's primary job to protect their property VALUE, and they come to a consensus to zone out the poor. After all, only low income people would want a small house...

109 posted on 12/31/2006 6:01:50 PM PST by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RightField; Peanut Gallery
I like this one. Nice and cozy looking.


110 posted on 12/31/2006 6:03:35 PM PST by Professional Engineer (Dad, why do we live in Texas? Because it's the best place on Earth son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

A house is not the same as an apartment or townhouse. If you'd rather listen to your choice of music than your neighbor's, and don't care for an upstairs neighbor's heavy footed lifestyle (just to mention 2 obvious things), a small house is much preferable to a condo or townhouse.
If I can only afford 800 sq. ft., I'd much prefer it to be in a small house than in an apartment or town house.


111 posted on 12/31/2006 6:06:42 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

"I don't think the anyone is proposing mandating small houses."

...have to quit cutting the pills in half...have to quit cutting the pills in half


112 posted on 12/31/2006 6:13:50 PM PST by Felis_irritable (Dirty_Felis_Irritable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: rogator
That leaves North Dakota. Why is it loosing population?

Have you ever spent a winter there? :)

113 posted on 12/31/2006 6:16:47 PM PST by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
It’s not the United States or Canada, but a more highly evolved combination of the two.

It's amazing how condescending the 'urban planning' people can be. If they want to live in tiny houses within spitting distance of their neighbors, and feel morally superior about it, that's fine for them. I prefer to have at least 40' between my house and my neighbors, and room inside the house to move around.

114 posted on 12/31/2006 6:17:56 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

" Have you ever spent a winter there? :)"

I should have put a sarcasm tag on my post. Half my neighbors here on the Oregon Coast are from North Dakota. None plan to move back, but some of the old ones go to Arizona for the winter.
Considering the number of NDers here, it's a wonder any are left in ND.


115 posted on 12/31/2006 6:44:24 PM PST by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

We moved into our brand new home the day after Thanksgiving. We live in rural Northern Nevada on 1.5 acres in a 1740 square foot home. What a blessing it is to live in a home with a foundation, after living for several years in our 36 ft. 5th wheel. The Lord is so good! We raised our four children in a three bedroom, 1400 ft. home on the central coast of California. My husband plans to build a large shop and build his own airplane.


116 posted on 12/31/2006 7:01:22 PM PST by Irish Queen (Still proud of being an old-fashioned teacher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rogator

I knew you were kidding. That's why I "smiled." LOL

I'm a former South Dakotan myself, but I must not have a lick of sense because I moved to Minnesota. At least there are lots of lakes and rolling hills.

I haven't been to Oregon in years, but as I recall it's a beautiful place, especially the coast. Happy New Year to you!


117 posted on 12/31/2006 7:04:51 PM PST by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Irish Queen
That sounds great!

When I'm in a trailer, the swaying always bothers me a little!

We're definitely going to go the small house/large shop route! Just be sure to build the door wide enough to get the airplane out! (My parents built a boat and had to take the basement doors off the hinges to get it out - with 3/4" to spare!)

118 posted on 12/31/2006 7:06:44 PM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

Thank you, Mplsconservative.

"I must not have a lick of sense because I moved to Minnesota. At least there are lots of lakes and rolling hills."

Of course you have a lick of sense.
Minnesota has lots of lutefisk.


119 posted on 12/31/2006 7:11:11 PM PST by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
Texas, on the other hand, has an open season on social planners. ;-)

Well, except those in Travis County (Austin, TX). Most everywhere else in Texas would frown on liberals fairly to very strongly.

120 posted on 12/31/2006 7:17:44 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson