Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bar Files Complaint Against Duke D.A.
AP ^ | 12-28-06 | AARON BEARD

Posted on 12/28/2006 2:49:23 PM PST by Snickering Hound

The North Carolina bar filed an ethics complaint Thursday against the prosecutor in the Duke lacrosse case, accusing him of breaking four rules of professional conduct when speaking to the reporters about the sensational case. The punishment for ethics violations can range from admonishment to disbarment.

Among the rules District Attorney Mike Nifong was accused of violating was a prohibition against making comments "that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public comdemnation of the accuser."

In a statement, the bar said it opened a case against Nifong in March 30, a little more than two weeks after the party where a 28-year-old student at North Carolina Central University hired to perform as a stripper said she was raped.

Nifong did not immediately return a call for comment.

Nor did defense attorney Joseph Cheshire, who represents one of the three lacrosse players charged with sexual offense and kidnapping.

Last week, Nifong dropped the rape charges against the three athletes after the stripper wavered in her story.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; mikenifong; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Howlin
If Nifong railroaded any other defendants, particularly if any of them were black...Wonder what his supporters will say then...?
41 posted on 12/29/2006 9:26:09 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

There were four complaints. I thought this was one of them. The one the MSM has the jitters about because of the ick factor involves his belated attempt to introduce ~swoon~ condoms into the story when no DNA was found.


42 posted on 12/29/2006 9:29:00 AM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

That's what I'm wondering, mew; I mean, if he will do this to rich boys, imagine what he's done to poor kids or adults unable to fight back.

I wish I thought the outrage over this case would keep the Bar from covering this up.


43 posted on 12/29/2006 9:32:15 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

What will be amusing in the end...is that this guy's legal career...was destroyed by a stripper...that he didn't even pay to strip or witness the strip. That will be the darkest moment of this entire episode. The stripper can never be punished...she walks away eventually with just a history tied to her name. This idiot...has no virtual career left...and will have to rebuild from scratch...if they disbar him. My best guess is that they will demand a 1-year suspension...which takes him off the case automatically.


44 posted on 12/29/2006 9:35:45 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

freudian slip.


45 posted on 12/29/2006 9:36:07 AM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

He did it to lock in black support for this election. There's no political value in busting poor people. You bust them to keep your numbers up, but don't stress the ethnicity.


46 posted on 12/29/2006 9:37:31 AM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

"this guy's legal career...was destroyed by a stripper..'

I don't think so. The fact he put off interviewing the stripper for months showed he didn't particularly believe her, but wanted to hold her credibility off until after the election. The third attempt at getting an ID of the accused, where they only included team player pictures, gave the game away. He knew early on there was no criminal case here, but rode it for political reasons. Heck, it worked for Al Sharpton.

The stripper didn't destroy Nifong's career, he did.


47 posted on 12/29/2006 9:42:00 AM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

I would imagine they have to try him before they can ask for him to be removed, right?


48 posted on 12/29/2006 9:51:21 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
He did it to lock in black support for this election.

Yep. 'Saviour of the downtrodden' striking back at the 'rich white boy overseers/abusers'--race/class baiting gig all the way.

So trite it could be a carriacture.

Bet it got him votes, too.

49 posted on 12/29/2006 9:54:15 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I wish I thought the outrage over this case would keep the Bar from covering this up.

Well, some defense lawyers ought to be looking at past cases with a fine toothed comb, just in case Nifong and/or Meehan have done this before.

50 posted on 12/29/2006 9:55:09 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson