It does sound like an invasion of privacy to grab medical records of private citizens without their consent. It looks like we had a nice crackdown against executive activism here by the judicial branch...interesting.
If a doctor was willing to certify each of the abortions was legit, then that met the law, from my understanding...nothing to base this on. But IANAL.
PING.
There is a strong suspicion that abortion mills are not reporting evidence of rape and statutory rape. If a 10 yr old show up for an abortion, in almost every state in the union, health personnel are required to contact law enforcement. An ER doc can get criminal charges against him if a child rape victim appears in the ER and he does not report it.
There is no "privacy" in this case. Just a vile, legally protected murderer.
Guess what. It happens all the time in the WoD. Adjudicated and approved long since.
"It does sound like an invasion of privacy to grab medical records of private citizens without their consent. It looks like we had a nice crackdown against executive activism here by the judicial branch...interesting.
If a doctor was willing to certify each of the abortions was legit, then that met the law, from my understanding...nothing to base this on. But IANAL."
What about children who are under age? Can a doctor that does nothing but abortions really verify that the childs parents knew and approved?
The issue here was solely whether or not statutory rapes were being covered up by adult men who fathered babies with underage girls.
============
There is no such thing.