Posted on 12/22/2006 9:15:57 AM PST by abb
Just heard from Julia Lewis on TV.
Nifong filing to dismiss rape charges. Will keep SA and kidnap charges.
Well let's hope for the sakes of the three defendants you live in Durham and get picked for the panel so you can vote to acquit.
Instead of a broom perhaps it was mops because she stated two ejaculated. ;)
That would be "spectral evidence" as was used in the Salem Witch Trials...
Here's a question from the Liestoppers board:
"And her ids, such as they were, were predicated upon what each one did to her, which in the id process included the penetration with a penis: how can Nifong think the remaining charges could be sustained?"
Squirtgun?
Gross.
Nifong should not be in a position to make any decisions whatsoever about who does or doesn't get charged with what.
I think they would certainly try. But I can see a judge excluding that. And even if the judge does not, this gives the jury a chance to say "this is not a rape trial" and we believe they groped her just like she said and what will the defense do in return? In other words, credible testimony or not, they will be able to reach a guilty verdict not contradicted by demonstrable facts (i.e. no sex took place because there's no DNA).
You know as sure as tomorrow will come the race whores will start spinning this as "Precious" is being intimidated. That she was scared into not testifying against her evil white attackers.
Just wait.
Why is his party never mentioned?
Make DEMOCRAT his first name!
Do believe Kathleen Willey was sexually harassed?
Nifong has never talked to the woman about the details of the incident, although investigators from his office and the Durham Police Department have interviewed her repeatedly over the past nine months.
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1115698/
Can you explain it? LOL
Even touching someone leaves some of the toucher's DNA. as the lab owner's own contamination of the evidence showed. No DNA of any LOX member was found on her BODY or CLOTHES.......so how can any of them be convicted of sexual assault?
Unless a change of venue is granted, the jury will be made up of Blacks who will tend to believe her story over the demon "White Man's" version. Irrespective of the actual facts, they are still are in deep trouble, if you ask me.
FLASHBACK:
http://www.newsobserver.com/1325/story/521410.html
MAGE 5 (David Evans)
Accuser: He looks like one of the guys who assaulted me sorta.
Sergeant: OK. How, um, how sure are you on this image?
Accuser: He looks just like him without the mustache.
Sergeant: OK, so the person had a mustache?
Accuser: Yes.
Sergeant: Umm, percentage wise, what is the likelihood this is one of the gentlemen who assaulted you?
Accuser: About 90 percent.
IMAGE 7 (Reade Seligmann)
Accuser: He looks like one of the guys who assaulted me.
Sergeant: How sure are you of that?
Accuser: A hundred percent.
Sergeant: You're a hundred percent sure. OK.
Accuser: Yes.
Sergeant: How did he assault you? Which one was he?
Accuser: He was the one that was standing in front of me ... um ... that made me perform oral sex on him.
Sergeant: OK. What else did he do?
Accuser: That was it.
(Investigator motions to the sergeant to repeat what the accuser said.)
Sergeant: He was the one that was standing in front of her that made her perform oral sex. One hundred percent sure. That would have been image number 7.
IMAGE 40 (Collin Finnerty)
Accuser: He is the guy who assaulted me.
Sergeant: What did he do?
Accuser: (Describes two sex acts.)
Sergeant: Was he the first one or the second one to do that?
Accuser: The second one.
Sergeant: Is he the one that strangled you or not?
Accuser: No.
Sergeant: So that is the gentleman that (describes sex act); picture 40.
IMAGE 4 (Matthew Wilson)
Sergeant: Did you recognize that person?
Accuser: He looked like Bret but I'm not sure.
Sergeant: Who is Bret?
Accuser: One of the guys that assaulted me.
Sergeant: One of the guys that assaulted you? OK.
Accuser: Um hum.
That's another "he said she said". In that case the Dems closed ranks behind WJC and the charge was not pursued. In this case the Dems are closing ranks behind Nifong and the charge will be pursued. You picked the perfect example to demonstrate the pernicious element of that charge. It means whatever the people in power want it to mean. And abuse of it seems to be a problem with the Dems every time. Paging Bob Packwood.
Yes all of her false claims will come in to impeach her as a witness. Also I would wonder if rape shield laws are enforce when rape is not alledged?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.