Lurker says those are facts not in evidence. We need to hold off on judgement.
If we have another 9/11, Newt, Tancredo, or someone like them, is a shoo-in for the Presidency.
I said 'pretending to be terrorists' was a fact not yet in evidence.
Get it right or don't quote me.
L
"If we have another 9/11, Newt, Tancredo, or someone like them, is a shoo-in for the Presidency."
You are absolutely correct. We will elect the most hawkish, aggressive, nationalistic government we have ever had in our history.
Newt, yes. Tancredo, never. But I agree with the premise. I would add a military candidate as a possiblity, such as Franks or Pace, should they choose to run.
Lurker says those are facts not in evidence. We need to hold off on judgement.Read up; become informed; ignorance is unbecoming.
pajamasmedia.com/2006/12/the_faking_imams_pajamas_media.php
SEE ALSO: The first public publication of the official police report on the incident including handwritten statements from witnesses.Download file (PDF 11.8 Mb) AND The letter from US Airways passenger "Pauline" to U.S. Airways: Download file (PDF 68K).
When...
"Evidence" my ass. 3 witnesses I read or heard from that plane corroborated those facts. Do I need a Dept of Justice Arab ass-kisser to present it as "evidence" to believe it?