Posted on 12/14/2006 5:17:48 AM PST by AZRepublican
I am just curious about something....when Senate reconvines on Jan 4 they will be one vote short in adopting rules governing the senate's organization because Sen. Johnson will recovering and unable to cast a vote. Could republicans then control who heads to committees? I'd love to see Patrick Leahy get the boot.
Highly cynical view, but probably not far from reality.
Nope. Johnson would have to either resign, or pass on, before any further steps could be taken. The next step in that case would be the appointment of a replacement. Johnson could be in a coma for the next two years and still maintain the seat.
Having said that, I do hope the guy recovers fully and is able to establish a personal relationship with his Creator if he hasn't already.
As long as Johnson holds office whether he votes or even attends Senate sessions- the democrats will have the majority. But if Johnson is unable to cast his vote, the Republicans have enough votes to obstruct.
Since the beginning of the Bush presidency the democrats have shown obstruction to be an artful way of gamesmanship governing but I predict the GOP is too public minded to use it so ruthlessly as did Daschle.
Of course they can.
I believe only if he is unable to vote due to severe deadness. Otherwise demoncrats have control.
As far as I know, yes. If by some circumstance Sen. Johnson dies or is "incapacitated" then the SD Gov. (an R) appoints a replacement and we're at a 50-50 tie.
"the people" elected Jim Jeffords as a Republican too. For what good that did.
If there is any precedent of a democrat governor choosing a Republican to assume a vacated Republican Senate seat then I will listen to that argument about "the will of the people".
public minded?......more like wuzzes.......
My sentiments exactly. His colleague Senator Thune said that he's a good guy, notwithstanding his politics. Prayers for him and his family.
Only on committees that Johnson is on .. if he doesn't resign
Or if they could convince Joe Lieberman to side with Republicans
Though I wouldn't hold my breath on that
Actually, I'm a bit surprised that we haven't already started to hear rumblings of what you suggest. Should this all come to pass, I believe that you can bet your last dollar that that will be the EXACT refrain from the NYTimes and liberals everywhere.
Further adding to your cynicism is my belief that Republicans will cave in to this and would in fact appoint a Dem replacement.
I believe the VP can only vote to break a tie. With 99 Senators, such ties are unlikely. On party lines, it's 50-49 Dem basically. So they'll still keep a majority.
So I don't think Johnson's absence creates a problem for the Dems. Were he to die or forced to resign, then it would create a 50-50 Senate, (assuming Rounds appointed a Republican) with Cheney breaking ties (assuming total GOP unity and standing on principle, which we all know is a pipe dream).
I know Vermont is a weird little state full of libral dipsticks,but how can they vote to send this Leahy character back to sit in the Senate.
Are they all traitors up there.
Would they all divulge any secret the US had to get their nams in th paper? You almost have to judge a people by the folks they elect to Represent them. Is Leahy what they want to represent them? Obviouly he is. Doesnt say much for them.
Then you have to look at another side of it. I live in Maryland and I dont like being represented by Cardin, Mikulski, or Steny Hoyer either.but there is little I can do about it as long as the Refugees from DC who live in PG county keep electing these democrats.
We should wait until lunch EST before we start this line of discussion, don't you think.
I believe he got beaned in the head with a media softball during his media conference call. This might not be anything more than a blood clot or something relatively minor at this point.
Yeah, I hope he recovers too, so that he can kneel before God and repent for having been a leftist tool working against the betterment of mankind for the pure purpose of attaining political power!
No .. it would be 50 Repub - 49 Dem - 2 Ind. (who vote/side with Dems)
Yep, you are a dreamer, alright.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.