Skip to comments.
Cintas warned against firing immigrant force
Washington Times ^
| 11-28-06
| Jerry Seper
Posted on 11/28/2006 12:32:46 AM PST by xtinct
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
In addition to being in the United States illegally, immigrants are using fake social security numbers.
Possible Homeland Security Committee Chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, Democrat, response to this illegal activity (punish the corporation which is trying to do the right thing?)
" Rep. Bennie Thompson said in a letter to Cintas Corp. it could be charged with "illegal activities in violation of state and federal law" if any of its 32,000 employees are terminated because they gave incorrect Social Security numbers to be hired. "
1
posted on
11/28/2006 12:32:47 AM PST
by
xtinct
To: xtinct
So the Democrat solution to illegal immigration - sue employers who check on employees for *discrimination!!*
Brilliant way of destroying the rule of law, Democrats!!
Democrats' Disaster & Demagoguery PING
2
posted on
11/28/2006 12:41:23 AM PST
by
WOSG
(The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
To: xtinct
Wait a minute!!! Using someone else's social security number is identity theft!!!!
That is a crime!!!!! It is illegal for companies to hire people who are not in this country legally. This stuffed shirt can KMA!!!
Why should a criminal with brown skin be treated better than a white skinned criminal?????
To: xtinct
Sounds like CINTAS needs to contact the Justice Department for a interpretation of the laws. Don't see how you can commit a crime by taking action required in order not to commit a crime. Somewhere George Orwell is smiling.
To: RedEyeJack
Sounds like CINTAS needs to contact the Justice Department for a interpretation of the laws.If you expect the Justice Department to stand up to a Democrat politician, you are mistaken.
5
posted on
11/28/2006 12:48:57 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Barack Hussein Obama)
To: xtinct
Thank you "punish the Republicans" voters or non voters, as the case might be!
6
posted on
11/28/2006 1:42:08 AM PST
by
Coldwater Creek
(The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
To: oldenuff2no
Bennie is after the Hispanic vote!!
7
posted on
11/28/2006 1:43:10 AM PST
by
Coldwater Creek
(The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
To: Jeff Chandler
8
posted on
11/28/2006 1:43:43 AM PST
by
SantosLHalper
("If the milk turns out to be sour. I'm not the kind of pu**y to drink it. 'Know what I mean?")
To: xtinct
it could be charged with "illegal activities in violation of state and federal law"
Wow! Now there's a clear cut case of law breaking if there ever was one. "illegal activities", well we don't want to be charged with that, now do we? I don't suppose that will extend to those using fake social security numbers?
9
posted on
11/28/2006 2:04:55 AM PST
by
starbase
(Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
To: xtinct
Well this is a smooth piece of legal maneuvering by Cintas, from the article:
"Cintas has not terminated any employees due to the Social Security mismatches and plans to continue its policy of placing these employees on indefinite leave until they produce the required documentation."
That way they can't be sued for termination, no one is terminated, just permanently on leave, I like it.
10
posted on
11/28/2006 2:12:48 AM PST
by
starbase
(Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
To: oldenuff2no
Why should a criminal with brown skin be treated better than a white skinned criminal????? Your comment summarizes something I've thought for years. What about the 14th Amendment and equal treatment under the law? Clearly if you're a law breaker who is part of a desirable voting group that a politician is courting, you're more special than the rest of the barnyard.
IOW, there IS unequal treatment under the law, and it's not going to go away as long as the politicians see a potential group of new voters to be gained. Our rights be damned.
11
posted on
11/28/2006 3:17:51 AM PST
by
Hardastarboard
(Why isn't there an "NRA" for the rest of my rights?)
To: xtinct
![](http://www.dccc.org/images/candidate_headshots/bennie_thompson_headshot.jpg)
More proof that Republicans are awful but Democrats are so much worse. Are stone out of their gourds when it comes to national security
12
posted on
11/28/2006 3:22:07 AM PST
by
dennisw
To: oldenuff2no
13
posted on
11/28/2006 3:24:47 AM PST
by
dennisw
To: RedEyeJack
"Sounds like CINTAS needs to contact the Justice Department...."
You mean GWB's hand picked illegal apologist with the hispanic surname?
The fix is already in , amigo.
14
posted on
11/28/2006 3:55:39 AM PST
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: xtinct
Rep. Bennie Thompson said in a letter to Cintas Corp. it could be charged with "illegal activities in violation of state and federal law" if any of its 32,000 employees are terminated because they gave incorrect Social Security numbers to be hired.The insanity continues. Employment term generally include dismissal if the applicant gives false information on their application. Providing a fake SS# should definitely fall under that category. Add to that the fact that use of a fake or stolen SS# is a felony (fraud).
If this idiot lifts a finger to prevent the law from being enforced, he should be arrested and charged with obstruction of justice and aiding and abetting known felons.
15
posted on
11/28/2006 4:28:42 AM PST
by
TheBattman
(I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
To: mariabush
Ha...just exactly what do you think would be happening any differently on this issue had we kept majority? NOTHING!! Bush is an OBLer and he is the one spearheading the campaign for CIR. Will it be tougher because because Bush is with the Dims on this issue, yes, but the bipartisan OBL agenda would have moved forward regardless. It is up to us to unite as a party, with or without Bush, and to stop them before this travesty is allowed to move forward.
16
posted on
11/28/2006 4:33:48 AM PST
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
To: taxed2death
You've noticed the 'trend' as well. Ever counted them up?
17
posted on
11/28/2006 4:35:11 AM PST
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
To: TheBattman
"If this idiot lifts a finger to prevent the law from being enforced, he should be arrested and charged with obstruction of justice and aiding and abetting known felons."
Ahh, in which case, those known felons are illegal aliens and INS law, since 1996, may make him/them subject to RICO prosecution.
18
posted on
11/28/2006 4:37:43 AM PST
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
To: xtinct
Since when does a congressman write to a legitimate bussiness, that has a legitimate concern, and threaten the business with his interpretation of the law? WTF!
And this guy's in line to be head of homeland security.
I wouldn't even let him in the clown car much less drive it!
19
posted on
11/28/2006 4:56:38 AM PST
by
.44 Special
(Death to Traitors!)
To: xtinct
Democrats are traitors and must be deported.
20
posted on
11/28/2006 5:03:37 AM PST
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson