For all those that believe this garbage, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn for sale that I'd like to talk to you about.
This is *not* a surprise any more than it would be if she were to take Vermont or the District of Columbia.
What the poll does not say is 85% voted for NONE OF THE ABOVE.
No one asked me.
Who the hell cares???! What more to we expect from New York? What's surprising is that they managed to elect Giuliani to anything at all. But that doesn't mean they'd go with him over Good Queen Hillary.
Rudy cannot bring NY to his candidacy, that is why he will not win.
Yet, time changes all things.
Well it does explain whey Rudy did not oppose her in this past election, he got the poll results long before this was made public.
67 + 47 = 114. Hmmm.
All the happy predictions made here in October come to mind, for some reason.
114%? Huh?
Who cares what New Yorkers think? I think I just won't vote for any New Yorker!
I hope that isn't the matchup. If it is, I hope some of my fellow freepers will band together with me to buy a small tropical Island to live out our days. I won't vote for a pro-choice, anti-gun, pro-gay candidate regardless of what party they claim to represent.
What, someone actually expected New York State to vote for a Republican for President? And to vote against Ms. Liberal Dreambabe? Why don't they do a more useful poll and ask if water is wet?
I have been a Republican since I helped Ronald Reagan win the governorship of California and I would vote for Hil before Gul.
Of course, I'd rather eat raw sandpaper, but that's another story.
This poll shouldn't be too surprising. To ny'ers 911 is becoming a distant memory and hillary gets constant adoration from the media.
This is no surprise, in PRNY (Peoples Republic of New York) has a well documented track record and is the reason I escaped from there in '76.