Posted on 11/17/2006 1:09:50 PM PST by Irisshlass
BENTONVILLE, AR, November 15, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A graphic sex-ed manual promoting lesbianism to teenage girls has been dropped by Wal-Mart only days after LifeSiteNews.com published a story exposing Wal-Mart's sale of the controversial book.
Produced by St. Stephens' Community House in Toronto, the book is titled "The Little Black Book for Girlz: A Book on Healthy Sexuality". Parents were outraged when they learned of the book which gives detailed instruction for teens to engage in lesbian sex acts.
read the rest of the story at:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/nov/06111703.html
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesite.net ...
Thanks for letting me know.
Agreed... and, welcome to FR.
You are just FAR TOO EASY a target!!
I know! I know! I wear it proudly on my forhead. *sigh*
Wellll now, WalMart was only selling the book on their website so it wasn't being carried in the stores. They've since removed it from their website. No one would have been exposed by walking past the book section and having the title jump out at them. Now I'm kind of curious because in the Super WalMart's I've been in throughout Texas and Oklahoma the book aisle is one of their smaller aisles and on the other side of the aisle are the greeting cards. I didn't realize in other stores the book aisle was as prominent as you indicate in your post.
And many people don't have a computer, or they're not on the internet, or they don't go to amazon because they don't have a card, or a number of reasons.
See my comment above...wasn't sold in their stores.
Also, I'm guessing you didn't read one of my other posts where I said: (Post 35)
After I read the links showing excerpts from the actual book on the other thread, I'm glad WM isn't carrying this book.
And then there's my other post on this thread about why it's entirely possible WM didn't realize exactly how explicit the book was: (Post 60)
Both Amazon and WM used the exact same wording to describe the book so I'm pretty sure that was the publisher's description.
Kind of sneaky but then I'm also relatively certain the publisher knew how people would respond if an accurate representation of the book was made available.
So, I stand by my statement of I really do get tired of all of the WM bashers here at FR.
I dont' doubt that for the most part, people dealing with these issues, serious issues, are passionately sincere in their beliefs on both sides of the argument. I would never ask anyone "not to do this or that way." If they do, they must feel a reason for doing so. And so I don't waste my time waiting "to like" or dislike what other people do. I simply make my point the best I can.
Hi, Gosh you put me on the spot. If it weren't because your post sounds so so full of feeling and sincerity, I would not bother responding to it. I believe what you are telling me about your parish...
You said you are devote and so that makes it obvious you are on the side of the church (a church you see under attack). I am not a devote anything. My loyalty is to the victims of the homosexual priests who abused them.
Let me ask you a question. Do you think is time for all of us, to kiss and make up? To forgive and forget, and move on?
I have to tell ahead of time, that we are far away from that point, but I am curious what's your thinking on it?
Something else, whether we like it or not the MSM still is very strong. HOW COME I never hear of the things you are mentioning on any big media outlets? I never hear CNN, NYT, Fox, WP, NBC... say anything about what the church is doing (Like the things you mentioned). If anything, just like now, with the coming conference of the Bishops in Baltimore, the point was already made that the Bishops are more concerned with "finding the language" to give the homosexuals protection/cover... THAT IS WHAT SURFACED ALREADY!... and so naturally, again, this raises the suspicion that there must be a number of homosexual Bishops in the church, since they put so much emphasis on this?
Another question, because I know you are sincere. Don't you think the Pope himself should have gotten involved visibly in this matter by now? (I KNOW, I KNOW, I am ignorant and I don't understand the workings of the church). BUT STILL, don't you think that what the gravity of what happened was bad enough to grant perhaps an exception and get the Pope directly involved?
I could picture a situation where the Pope would make a trip to America for a week or so, to have "conversation" with the American clergy, mainly the bishops, regarding the matter of the abuses. I could picture, after the conversation, a big mass somewhere, and have *** THE POPE, AS HEAD OF THE CHURCH extend and apology to the victims, as well as promise that the church would clean up and not let this happen again, etc, etc.
Do you see my point?... the church has to do SOMETHING BIG!!... to send c loud and clear message that we are ready to turn the corner. (Yes I know the Pope did something like this just a few days ago, and that WAS GOOD!)... but still not enough for us here in America. More acts like that, with a very clear message, have to be done before the world beging to believe that the Roman Catholic Church is serious this time.
Thanks for your response. I might response longer later on. If not, until the next one :)
Your welcome :) Until the next one..LOL :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.