Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HOA Rule Forbids Couple To Smoke In Their Own Home Judge Upholds Homeowners' Association Order
TheDenverChannel.com ^ | 11/16/06 | TheDenverChannel.com

Posted on 11/17/2006 10:46:11 AM PST by TheKidster

GOLDEN, Colo. -- A judge has upheld a homeowners association's order barring a couple from smoking in the town house they own.

Colleen and Rodger Sauve, both smokers, filed a lawsuit in March after their condominium association amended its bylaws last December to prohibit smoking.

"We argued that the HOA was not being reasonable in restricting smoking in our own unit, nowhere on the premises, not in the parking lot or on our patio," Colleen Sauve said. The Heritage Hills #1 Condominium Owners Association was responding to complaints from the Sauves' neighbors who said cigarette smoke was seeping into their units, representing a nuisance to others in the building.

In a Nov. 7 ruling, Jefferson County District Judge Lily Oeffler ruled the association can keep the couple from smoking in their own home.

Oeffler stated "smoke and/or smoke smell" is not contained to one area and that smoke smell "constitutes a nuisance." She noted that under condo declarations, nuisances are not allowed.

The couple now has to light up on the street in front of their condominium building.

"I think it's ridiculous. If there's another blizzard, I'm going to be having to stand out on the street, smoking a cigarette," said Colleen Suave.

For five years the couple has smoked in their living room and that had neighbors fuming.

"At times, it smells like someone is sitting in the room with you, smoking. So yes, it's very heavy," said condo owner Christine Shedron.

The Sauves said they have tried to seal their unit. One tenant spent thousands of dollars trying to minimize the odor.

"We got complaints and we felt like it was necessary to protect our tenants and our investment," said Shedron.

The Suaves said they would like to appeal the judge's ruling but are unsure if they have the money to continue fighting. They said what goes on behind their closed doors shouldn't be other people's business.

"I don't understand. If I was here and I was doing a lawful act in my home when they got here, why can they say, 'OK, now you have to change,'" said Colleen Suave. "We're not arguing the right to smoke as much as we're arguing the right to privacy in our home."

Other homeowners believe, as with loud music, that the rights of a community trump the rights of individual residents. The HOA is also concerned that tenants will sue those homeowners for exposure to second-hand smoke and this could be a liability issue.

The couple said that they would like to unload their condo and get out of the HOA entirely, but they are not sure if the real estate market is right.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: readthecontract; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 761-776 next last
To: TheKidster
No the concept itself runs counter to the ideals upon which this country was built.

Groups of people coming together to make rules/law to govern themselves runs contrary to the ideals upon which this county was built?

Do you live outside the United States? Do you belong to ANY clubs and organizations?

That's just a ridiculous statement.

141 posted on 11/17/2006 11:38:13 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

There would not be a problem if their house were detached. Since it isn't others can be irritated by the ciggie smoke. I do have problems with the smoking ban being imposed after they had moved in


142 posted on 11/17/2006 11:38:29 AM PST by dennisw ("For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks-- Matt. 12:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster
Some years ago, before there was a strong anti-smoking movement, our department hired a secretary that was absolutely phobic about tobacco smoke. (Now, I don't use tobacco and don't like the smell either, but this lady was, well, more than a little nuts about it.)

One day shortly after she started, I was in a closed storage room where the door was constantly kept locked, showing her our filing system. (This was back in the "paper days" when everybody had those big file cabinets, for those of you who don't remember).

I remember opening the top drawer of one of the filing cabinets, and she recoiled like she'd been pepper-sprayed. I already had her pegged for a weirdo, but I asked her what was wrong anyway, to which she replied "CIGARETTE SMOKE JUST CAME OUT OF THAT DRAWER!".

I pointed out that the only people allowed in that space were the people in our department, and that none of us smoked, and that I doubted that anybody snuck in their and blew smoke into the filing cabinet to poison her.

She didn't last long. Smoking was only one of a long list of things that bothered her. I think she was basically allergic to human contact.

143 posted on 11/17/2006 11:38:56 AM PST by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
That must be some damn crappy construction by the developer of they can smell a cigarette through the walls.

Bingo!

Where were you 137 posts ago? :-)

144 posted on 11/17/2006 11:39:05 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

No the (HOA) concept itself runs counter to the ideals upon which this country was built.



Freedom of association seems to me to be a VERY American principle.

As does the right to put enduring restrictions on MY OWN property.


145 posted on 11/17/2006 11:39:27 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Inwoodian
This was an amendment to the by-laws that went into effect last December. Presumably this was after the couple bought their condo unit. If so, this is a change in the terms and conditions after the purchase.

The HOA is an ongoing form of neighborhood self-government. You can't complain about the "temrs and conditions" changing any more than you can complain about the local school board raising taxes.

Rules are rules and people who buy homes in an HOA voluntarily agree to continue to live under the governance of the HOA.

SD

146 posted on 11/17/2006 11:39:28 AM PST by SoothingDave (Save the Cheerleader. Save the World.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

How do they prove it is in their house. Probably isn't proved, They just said it was. Well, if they smoke outside then it isn't in their house. I know, its in their air. Geez, we all may die at the hands of Muslim extremism. Hey, I'll take the smoke. Beats burning autos to the tune of 300 a night. How did we all live through the last 50 years? Amazing


147 posted on 11/17/2006 11:42:30 AM PST by dforest (Don't get fooled, the bigger struggle is still out there, and growing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

HOAs are for born socialists who can't get enough government in their lives.


148 posted on 11/17/2006 11:43:05 AM PST by Jonathon Spectre (Nazis believed they were doing good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger
The smoking thing is a dealbreaker for me. I won't vote for any politician that wants to persecute smokers.

Maybe it's time to make all HOAs voluntary. Voluntary as in not a condition of sale.
149 posted on 11/17/2006 11:43:24 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

I feel bad that a person can't just knock on their neighbor's door, say "Excuse me, but your cigarette smoke is coming through the wall into my apartment." and the smoking neighbor take care of the problem. How? I don't know how. But it seems like that should be the way this is taken care of. No rules or laws...just common courtesy.

What does it say about our society that problems like this can't be solved without rules and lawsuits?


150 posted on 11/17/2006 11:44:17 AM PST by 2Jedismom (http://kimsbug.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Maybe it's time to make all HOAs voluntary. Voluntary as in not a condition of sale.


Not big on the property rights of the current owner, are you? Nor on those who bough in reliance on the value-enhancing effects of the rules?

HOAs are the CONSERVATIVE option, because they allow individuals property owners to pick their own rules, instead of deferring to government authorities. The most local form of control.
151 posted on 11/17/2006 11:45:27 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom

There are smoke sucking units for under $1000. The association should buy this couple one since the smoking ban was not in effect when they bought in


152 posted on 11/17/2006 11:46:23 AM PST by dennisw ("For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks-- Matt. 12:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Unfortunately I have to agree with you about smokers and Israel.


153 posted on 11/17/2006 11:47:06 AM PST by TheKidster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Jonathon Spectre

HOAs are for born socialists who can't get enough government in their lives.



To the contrary.

But instead of explaining again, maybe you should just enjoy the choice of buying elsewhere?


154 posted on 11/17/2006 11:47:09 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

Land of the Free, Home of the Brave.


155 posted on 11/17/2006 11:47:12 AM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
How do they prove it is in their house. Probably isn't proved, They just said it was.

Your thesis then is that there was never any smoke that infiltrated the other units and they did this all as a lark and a ruse to persecute poor, innocent clean-air-generating smokers?

Paranoid much?

Why not just believe that when your smoke bothers the neighbors and penetrates their homes, you need to do something about it? Don't you believe in taking responsibility for your actions?

SD

156 posted on 11/17/2006 11:48:00 AM PST by SoothingDave (Save the Cheerleader. Save the World.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Who buys a home, the biggest investment of their lives, and doesn't read the fine print?

-----------------------------------------

The rules were changed....who doesn't read the whole post?

157 posted on 11/17/2006 11:48:03 AM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok

Sorry, you didn't deserve that. I seemed an elitist attitude. I still don't see the problem though, other than it may seem to make the area look more blue collar.


158 posted on 11/17/2006 11:48:40 AM PST by TheKidster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

I categorize this under, "you knew the job was dangerous when you took it".

By joining a homeowners association, you voluntarily give up a lot of rights. That's why I don't.


159 posted on 11/17/2006 11:49:08 AM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

I think you have nailed it.

The concept of quiet enjoyment of the OTHER people is being lost here.

These people were smoking so much that it was permiating the walls of their townhouse. I bet if they had bought air scrubbers so their smoke would not permiate or did some action to keep the smoke from passing through it would have kept them out of trouble.

It is like the neighbor who blasts the stereo at 2am.


160 posted on 11/17/2006 11:49:57 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 761-776 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson