Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain woos conservatives on judges issue
MSNBC ^ | 11/16/06 | Tom Curry

Posted on 11/16/2006 6:17:26 PM PST by freespirited

In his quest for the Republican presidential nomination, Arizona Sen. John McCain courted Thursday the group that vets conservative judicial nominees, the Federalist Society....

In his speech to a packed ballroom at a Washington hotel, McCain assured the group that despite last week’s sobering election returns for Republicans, “the election was not an affirmation of the other party’s program." ...

He spoke of the importance of judges who would strictly interpret the Constitution....

The reaction from the Federalists was polite, but not overwhelming. ...

Some social conservatives are wary of McCain because he has never shared their enthusiasm for such causes as banning same-sex marriage.

One Republican active in judicial confirmation politics, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said of McCain the day before the speech: “He’s regarded as a problem among conservatives on several levels.”

McCain was a leader of the bipartisan Gang of 14, a group of senators who averted a vote on changing Senate rules to abolish filibusters of judicial nominees. ...

McCain explicitly addressed his role as a leader of the Gang of 14, saying he was “proud of my role persuading my fellow Republican senators to respect the limits of our own power and not abolish the (judicial) filibuster rule.” ...

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: forgetit; gangof14; gopnomination; johnmccain; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: BurtSB

He won't have to run third party to get Hillary elected.

Just being the Republican nominee will accomplish that.


41 posted on 11/16/2006 7:15:57 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
He's certainly not one of my top choices and I doubt I'll vote for him in the primary even if he's my only choice (I wrote in candidates when Bush, Sr. was the only choice on the ballot), but the reality is that if my choice is him or Hillary! or him or Kerry, I'm voting for him.
42 posted on 11/16/2006 7:26:28 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I agree with you .. I think this possibility is terribly frightening.


43 posted on 11/16/2006 7:39:05 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I was against then before I was for them.


44 posted on 11/16/2006 7:40:58 PM PST by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Wonder how long before the Dems abolish this rule?


45 posted on 11/16/2006 7:43:16 PM PST by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: maxter

yes.


46 posted on 11/16/2006 7:45:21 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Dear John,

I no longer, nor did I ever "love" you. Apparently they brain washed you in 'Nam and you came back as the Saigon Candidate.

You never cared for me...you just wanted my vote. Please go away.

Maddie10


47 posted on 11/16/2006 7:55:26 PM PST by madison10 (If my people, who are called by My name will humble themselves and pray...I will heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
I fully expect McCain to be Hillry's running mate

Nope he will be the "independent conservative" which will take enough votes from the Republican so she can git elected
48 posted on 11/16/2006 8:16:53 PM PST by mouser (run the rats out its the only hope we have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mouser
McCain is not willing to sacrifice himself for Hillry. Nope he will be expecting something in return, and my guess is that if he does not win the primary he will team up with her.
49 posted on 11/16/2006 8:22:09 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
The reaction from the Federalists was polite, but not overwhelming. ...

Like me, they know McCain is a liar!

50 posted on 11/16/2006 8:24:22 PM PST by airborne (MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! Jesus is the reason for the season!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

that man makes me sick!


51 posted on 11/16/2006 8:25:56 PM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
In his quest for the Republican presidential nomination, Arizona Sen. John McCain courted Thursday the group that vets conservative judicial nominees, the Federalist Society...hope everybody saw the panel discussion tonight on Fox News' Brit Humes' Special Report, during which the poll done on that "conservative web site" Free Republic was cited, "non scientific, but they voted 90% to 10% against McCain's nomination"...The panel - Barnes, Krauthammer, and Kondrake - thought eventually he'd be able to win over the conservative base...sure......
52 posted on 11/16/2006 8:48:11 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

"On April 15, 2005 --less than three months after President Bush had begun a second term won in part because of his pledge to fight for sound judges-- Senator McCain appeared on Hardball and announced he would not support the "constitutional option" to end Democratic filibusters. Then, stunned by the furious reaction, the senator from Arizona cobbled together the Gang of 14 "compromise" that in fact destroyed the ability of the Republican Party to campaign on Democratic obstructionism while throwing many fine nominees under the bus. Now in the ruins of Tuesday there is an almost certain end to the slow but steady restoration of originalism to the bench. Had McCain not abandoned his party and then sabotaged its plans, there would have been an important debate and a crucial decision taken on how the Constitution operates. The result was the complete opposite. Yes, President Bush got his two nominees to SCOTUS through a 55-45 Senate, but the door is now closed, and the court still tilted left. A once-in-a-generation opportunity was lost."

Hugh Hewitt


53 posted on 11/16/2006 8:52:56 PM PST by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

Great. Make sure Senator "Kill Free Speech" knows we exist. How long until some Campaign Finance Reform II "this time we really mean it" is passed and makes forums like this illegal?


54 posted on 11/16/2006 9:01:25 PM PST by Ingtar (Prensa dos para el ingles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

The country club elites that run the Republican Party have already settled on McCain. It's his turn, just like it was Bob Dole's turn in 96.

Don't expect a Republican President or return of control of Congress in 2008 as long as these guys pull the strings.


55 posted on 11/16/2006 9:04:34 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Maybe he's just thinking of the ones who stayed home on the seventh?


56 posted on 11/16/2006 9:31:16 PM PST by swampmonster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Gang of 14 or not, Alito is still on the Supreme Court.

If Bush's 3rd/4th nominees (if they come) and we get someone like Roberts or Alito through, I'll let the Gang of 14 slide.


57 posted on 11/16/2006 10:00:43 PM PST by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

If McCain is nominated, he will suffer the same fate as Bob Dole in 1996!


58 posted on 11/17/2006 4:49:04 AM PST by petkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TSchmereL

What we need to do now is stun him with a furious reaction to his candidacy!


59 posted on 11/17/2006 6:08:38 AM PST by freespirited (The MSM is the root of all evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bfstplk

--Which of Keating's 5 was McCain? (In importance.)--

1) Cranston (D)
2) DeConcini (D)
3) Riegle (D)
4) Glenn (D)
5) McCain (Rhinoceros)


60 posted on 11/17/2006 10:49:59 AM PST by rfp1234 (I've had it up to my keyster with these leaks!!! - - - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson