Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is wrong with gay marriage? (survey)

Posted on 11/15/2006 10:57:01 AM PST by Seven Minute Maniac

I am a student. I personally do not support homosexuality, and I find the idea of gay marriage repulsive. However, I struggle during discussions to persuade my liberal peers and professors that it is harmful. Most liberal professors and students at my college do not view homosexuality as abnormal, and treat me like I am nuts when I suggest that marriage should not be altered to include gays and lesbians. Please help to supply me with some ammunition by posting below.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141 next last
To: Texas_shutterbug

This would suggest sexual identity problems at both extremems of the spectrum, IMHO.


121 posted on 11/16/2006 7:07:33 AM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: dpa5923

"Were you sucked into this thread?"

No, I voice my opinions here willingly.

"just because you cannot see the potential damage to our culture and society that destroying the most basic framework of civiliation will have, doesn't mean others don't."

One more time, I'll ask -> How does it affect me in the least little bit if the two gay guys that have lived monogomously across the street from me for the last five years get a legal marriage? If it doesn't affect me, living right in the middle of ground zero for the gay community, how is this going to unravel the very fabric of civilization?


122 posted on 11/16/2006 7:25:52 AM PST by NOLA_homebrewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Logic n' Reason
You can claim that God or religious justification is based on belief not fact, I would differ...and what a horrible thing to believe, huh? Goodness over evil and all...but back to the subject, why should it be changed? by a large majority, people are saying they do not want it changed. Why can one small group decide to change the core belief of something against the will of the large majority. If there was some civil right being trampled on, then that would be different. There is an alternative, civil union, why does it have to be marriage? Why do a few have this need to disrupt things? Why do you NEED to change the definition of marriage?
123 posted on 11/16/2006 8:49:49 AM PST by old and cranky (You! Out Of The Gene Pool - Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: NOLA_homebrewer

For centuries people have asked what would it hurt if...And unfortunately they find that it never stops at that. Would you agree that if a man and his 4 "wives" have been living together in harmony for many years, he should be able to legally marry them all? I mean it doesn't affect me, so...


124 posted on 11/16/2006 8:57:50 AM PST by old and cranky (You! Out Of The Gene Pool - Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
At both ends of the spectrums?

Elaborate, please.

125 posted on 11/16/2006 9:59:16 AM PST by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: old and cranky

For the crowd that believes the only purpose for getting married is to have children, I'd say they should probably support the polygamy concept.

So, whats the next step in this vast homosexual conspiracy that is obvious to everyone but me, if gay marriage is accepted? You mean to tell me that eventually theres goign to be a cry for legislation to make homosexual mandatory?


126 posted on 11/16/2006 10:01:41 AM PST by NOLA_homebrewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Seven Minute Maniac

Ask Sodom what's wrong with gay marriage, ie: read the Bible.


127 posted on 11/16/2006 10:03:32 AM PST by DungeonMaster (Man defiles a rock when he chips it with a tool. Ex 20:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NOLA_homebrewer
Never heard me say that the only reason to get married is to have children...as for the next step, polygamists would say that since marriage is being redefined, lets go a step farther, make it legal for us, and now that we have redefined marriage, lets find something new to redefine, how about the age you can get married? Who has the right to tell a 12 year old they can't get married if the parents say it is ok, I mean it wouldn't affect ME, ok now that we have redefined it so that a 60 year old man can marry a 12 year old, after all they are in a monogamous loving relationship, lets let dad marry his daughter, once again, I mean it doesn't affect MY marriage, now lets just get rid of parents ok's altogether, I mean it has worked for abortion, why not marriage.
128 posted on 11/16/2006 10:45:37 AM PST by old and cranky (You! Out Of The Gene Pool - Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

That gay men apparently are immune to caring about fidelity at all, whereas lesbians apparently are obsessed with it [ref. remark made that they are highly jealous and possessive.]


129 posted on 11/16/2006 10:58:41 AM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Seven Minute Maniac
Health Risks of Gay Sex pdf

Homosexual group's own study reveals health risks of gay lifestyle

Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ a Health Risk Doctors Warn Parliamentarians

130 posted on 11/16/2006 11:43:15 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old and cranky

We have laws to protect people, which is why a 12 yr old can't get married - they are children and not fully aware of their actions and consequences. Do you think your examples are really on par with the scenario of two consenting adults?


131 posted on 11/16/2006 1:27:38 PM PST by NOLA_homebrewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

"The anicient Athenians would stone to death sodomites caught with children. "

Conversely, the Spartans actually encouraged the practice as a means of fostering closer personal ties within a military unit, a prime requirement for military discipline in the phalanx. The amount of sodomy in the Spartan military academies was legendary,and there are thousands of written accounts on the very subject (homosexuality as a military training tool).

I would suggest that you find another historical example to make your argument.

P.S. I'm not in favor of homosexual marriage, just being intellectually honest, that's all, PROMISE!


132 posted on 11/16/2006 6:09:39 PM PST by Wombat101 (Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: NOLA_homebrewer

Homosexual couples living as though they were marriage will likely not affect your marriage or mine. My wife and I have been together too long, and I would reckon you and your as well, to be affected by such, but it will affect society as a whole.

When social stigma is removed from an activity, you have more of that activity. A greater frequency of an activity will encourage others to participate in that activity (yes, even homosexuality if the stigma is replace with an air of acceptance and normalcy.)

Homosexual marriages will lessen the worth of real marriages and you will have less of them. Also, this acceptance and normalcy will be taught to children through school or TV. They might be your kids, they might not be, but they will be members of society nonetheless. If you don't believe schools can influence behavior look at tobacco usage in the last 30 years. (And please don't tell me you believe you can shield your child or the millions of others in this nation from this)

Homosexual "marriage" may not affect you directly, but it will have a lasting and serious impact on society as a whole. To suggest otherwise is either willful ignorance or blind stupidity.

Please look at a few of the links posted in this thread. Here's one to start you off.

http://www.familyresearchinst.org/Default.aspx?tabid=8


133 posted on 11/16/2006 6:54:12 PM PST by dpa5923 (Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Seven Minute Maniac

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1034938/posts


134 posted on 11/16/2006 7:03:51 PM PST by abigailsmybaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

My husband and I never intended to create a baby, and now after 20 years of marriage, it's a moot point. I guess the whole reason for our marriage has ended.


135 posted on 11/17/2006 5:44:13 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

but did you have the ABILITY to create one?


136 posted on 11/18/2006 6:19:46 AM PST by joe fonebone (Israel, taking out the world's trash since 1948.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

We never tested it. I don't know.


137 posted on 11/18/2006 7:42:29 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: newcats

"Since my wife and I have decided not to have any children, we are not considered married?"

In the past, like it or not, you would be considered married but selfish.
It's your decision, as far as I am concerned. The majority of married couples do produce children. The institution of marriage is big enough and broad enough to include couples who, for various reasons, do not produce children. These couples can include the elderly and infertile couples. It would not be practicle to exclude all heterosexual couples who do not have children from the institution of marriage. The point is that all of these couples are male-female and do not seriously undermine the basic rules of marriage. (The rules also include prohibitions against marrying close relatives and those who are underage. These rules also essentially revolve around procreation.)


138 posted on 11/18/2006 7:16:28 PM PST by beejaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NOLA_homebrewer

"One more time, I'll ask -> How does it affect me in the least little bit if the two gay guys that have lived monogomously across the street from me for the last five years get a legal marriage? If it doesn't affect me, living right in the middle of ground zero for the gay community, how is this going to unravel the very fabric of civilization? "

It's not just about you. Try thinking in broader terms, beyond yourself. If you are unable to avert your gaze from the mirror, then think about how much more health insurance will cost you if homosexuals are entitled to health insurance for their "spouses" with AIDS.
Do you have children? It sounds as if you don't. If so, do you want them sexualized by the gay lobby? If you don't, do you care about children? They are the entire future.
Other people can add to this if they want to. It's late; I'm tired.


139 posted on 11/18/2006 8:04:30 PM PST by beejaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: NOLA_homebrewer
two gay guys that have lived monogomously

Monogamy dednotes a biological procreation... they had a turd baby???

140 posted on 11/18/2006 8:12:50 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson