Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Political Santa Claus by Herman Cain
The New Voice ^ | November 15, 2006 | Herman Cain

Posted on 11/15/2006 6:48:25 AM PST by K-oneTexas

No Political Santa Claus by Herman Cain

If you think Santa Claus came early this year by delivering liberal majorities in the House and Senate, you had better check your stocking again. Liberals and the political parties will continue to play us like the kid who asked Santa for a pony, but woke up Christmas morning to find a big box of horse manure.

At first blush, Congressman Charlie Rangel's (D-NY) comments last week about Mississippi are merely the latest exposé of Northeast limousine liberal elitism, similar to Senator John Kerry's (D-MA) remarks before the election disparaging our brave military personnel. Rangel was quoted in the New York Times saying, "Mississippi gets more than their fair share back in federal money, but who the hell wants to live in Mississippi?"

Rangel's quote not only describes many liberals' contemptuous view of Middle America, but also illustrates how liberals, regardless of party affiliation, view the role of federal government. Peel back Rangel's rhetorical onion further, and you can see the degenerative influence of the political parties on Congress' ability to solve our most serious fiscal crises.

The coming Senate Democratic majority means that Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) will likely become the next chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee. Sen. Byrd has sat on the Appropriations Committee since 1959. Over 30 federal projects in Sen. Byrd's home state bear his name. During a March 15, 2001 speech on the Senate floor, Byrd stated, "One man's pork is another man's job. Pork has been good investment in West Virginia. You can look around and see what I've done."

Not that anyone will notice much change between Byrd and Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), the current Senate Appropriations chairman. Stevens' home state of Alaska leads the nation in receipt of taxpayer dollars for earmarked pork projects. Alaskans per capita receive more than $611 of our money for earmarked appropriations. The national average is $19 per capita.

In the House, Transportation Committee chairman Rep. Don Young (R-AK) doesn't seem too upset about ceding the majority to the Democrats. Young, architect of the bill to fund the infamous Bridge to Nowhere, will likely hand his golden gavel to Rep. James Oberstar (D-MN). According to the Anchorage Daily News, Young "changed the way funds were allocated to increase the amount controlled by minority Democrats to 45 percent." Young, who will remain on the committee as ranking minority member, claims Oberstar told him, "I'll treat you as good as you treated me, and that was great." Bipartisanship - it's a beautiful thing.

The liberals' goal is not to shrink the growth of government, rein in Social Security and Medicare entitlement spending, tax us less or allow Americans to pursue their own economic freedom. Rather, their clear objective is redistribution of tax receipts to potential voters in the form of tax credits, earmark-spending projects and social engineering programs.

The two major political parties are attempting to convince voters that ideology and policy prescriptions are no longer relevant. Election contests are no longer a forum to discuss individual candidates' solutions to the big issues of the day. Instead, candidates receive their talking points from the party leaders, reducing the election and public policy process to little more than a popularity contest. We the voters are rendered tailgaters in the parking lot, waving our red or blue flags in support of our favorite team.

It is little wonder policy discourse was noticeably absent throughout the 2006 election season. The Democratic strategy was to make the House and Senate elections a national referendum on President Bush and his oversight of the war in Iraq. Republicans played right into the Democrats' hands. Few Republican candidates discussed their plans to restructure Social Security, fight the global war on Islamic terrorism, simplify the tax code or cut federal spending. Instead, the Republican strategy was to scare their base to the voting booth with the threat of a "Speaker Pelosi." Hope and optimism, not fear, motivate and inspire voters.

We arrived at this bipartisan assault on common sense because most members of the House and Senate are in permanent campaign mode. Save a handful of principled conservatives in both chambers, liberals in both parties long ago abandoned their oath to support and defend the Constitution.

Government cannot and will not solve our problems or the problems Congress itself created. Despite the countless platitudes toward bipartisanship, the hard work of solving the hard problems will remain in two years for a new president and a new Congress.

Congressman Rangel's comments should offend not just Mississippians, but any American concerned about the future of a political system that places pork over fiscal discipline and party over policy.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; hermancain; republicans
Missed Herman Cain's article last week at The New Voice: Compassionate Conservatism Lost

1 posted on 11/15/2006 6:48:26 AM PST by K-oneTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative; freeangel; MNJohnnie; rodguy911; SittinYonder; groanup; Fudd Fan; ...
   The image   Herman Cain PING!            
"Success is not the key to happiness. Happiness is the key to success. If you love what you are doing, you will be successful."


FReepMail me if you would like On/Off the HERMAN CAIN PING!
2 posted on 11/15/2006 6:49:48 AM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
Liberals and the political parties will continue to play us like the kid who asked Santa for a pony, but woke up Christmas morning to find a big box of horse manure.

Yep. He's right.

3 posted on 11/15/2006 6:52:10 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

" The two major political parties are attempting to convince voters that ideology and policy prescriptions are no longer relevant. Election contests are no longer a forum to discuss individual candidates' solutions to the big issues of the day. Instead, candidates receive their talking points from the party leaders, reducing the election and public policy process to little more than a popularity contest. We the voters are rendered tailgaters in the parking lot, waving our red or blue flags in support of our favorite team. "

Money quote -- and, sadly, all too true....

We have traded our status as "Citizens" for the *supporting role* of "consumers"...

And we lost ourselves, in the process...


4 posted on 11/15/2006 6:59:28 AM PST by Uncle Ike ("Tripping over the lines connecting all of the dots"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alia
Living next door to Mississippi, I consider Rangel's venom as hate speech!!
5 posted on 11/15/2006 7:00:45 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alia
Liberals and the political parties will continue to play us like the kid who asked Santa for a pony, but woke up Christmas morning to find a big box of horse manure.

But Santa, here is what I wanted...

What do I do with this?


6 posted on 11/15/2006 7:04:57 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

lol, no kidding. And movies and magazine articles, MSM "advocacy" pieces will spring up, saturating the globe to help Democrats talk about how stupid the voters are, and why they need Pelosi/Hillary Mommie, Dearism.


7 posted on 11/15/2006 7:38:52 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

Exactly!


8 posted on 11/15/2006 7:47:11 AM PST by griswold3 (I cried when I erased my tagline....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
When I heard it, and Rangel's response -- I knew I was hearing a political version of "Living for the City" by Stevie Wonder. The song starts out in Mississippi.. it's about poor, hardworking black folks working their fingers to the bone so their children can have a freer life in the blue zones/City.

"His sisters black but she is shonuff pretty
Her skirt is short but lord her legs are sturdy
To walk to school shes got to get up early
Her clothes are old but never are they dirty
Living just enough, just enough for the city

Her brothers smart hes got more sense than many
His patiences long but soon he wont have any
To find a job is like a haystack needle
Cause where he lives they dont use colored people
Living just enough, just enough for the city...

Des'ree has a version too. Seems to be a theme mantle among certain musicians.

9 posted on 11/15/2006 7:53:56 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

HC bump


10 posted on 11/15/2006 9:11:52 AM PST by Christian4Bush (Don't blame me - I didn't vote for these DEM bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
Not that anyone will notice much change between Byrd and Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), the current Senate Appropriations chairman. Stevens' home state of Alaska leads the nation in receipt of taxpayer dollars for earmarked pork projects. Alaskans per capita receive more than $611 of our money for earmarked appropriations. The national average is $19 per capita.

Too be fair.

Roads and bridges cost just as much in Alaska as in the lower 48 (if not more) and there are a lot less people living up there. So of course the per capita cost will be higher.

11 posted on 11/15/2006 12:44:34 PM PST by hattend (Carpe Macaca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

Thanks for the ping, K.


12 posted on 11/15/2006 3:12:31 PM PST by groanup (Limited govenment is the answer. Now, what's the question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
YouTube.com: "Santa's Last Call" (November 15, 2006)

13 posted on 11/15/2006 5:39:33 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Well, the YouTube.com has become "not available" so here's the Google link:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2374362723887908013


14 posted on 11/15/2006 5:48:50 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson