Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 12 November 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 12 November 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 11/12/2006 4:58:59 AM PST by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, November 12th, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean; presidential counselor Dan Bartlett.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev.; White House chief of staff Josh Bolten.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Sens. Joe Biden. D-Del., and Carl Levin, D-Mich.; Bolten.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Bolten; Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz; Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guests; lineup; news; sunday; talkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,041-1,056 next last
To: OldFriend

Exactly


301 posted on 11/12/2006 7:39:31 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: sgtyork

That {Katrina as a symbol of failure instead of immense success] was the top of the rollercoaster, it was all downhill from there.

****

Agreed!


302 posted on 11/12/2006 7:39:35 AM PST by maica (9/11 was not ?the day everything changed?, but the day that revealed how much had already changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I agree with what you said .. except the part about keeping them in check

The will over reach like they always do

The question is .. will our side handle it better or will they continue to blame Bush and the Republicans like in pass years

The is a PR Election .. and the people listen to what they hear others tell them


303 posted on 11/12/2006 7:41:29 AM PST by Mo1 (Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 2 heart beats away from the Presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative
invludence?

I assume you meant "influence," but I always like to check to make sure something like this isn't a word I'm just not familiar with (it does happen, every now and again).  I plugged in "invludence" in Google and got 7 hits.  In each case it's an obvious typo where influence is meant, but that also means that it's a common touch typing error.  Thank you QWERTY keyboard.

304 posted on 11/12/2006 7:41:54 AM PST by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All
Heard it both from Dean and Reid this AM. So it's obviously part of the DNC talking points for at least a while...maybe a long term strategy?

"No such thing as conservative and liberal anymore."

"Obsolete words."

"I don't know what those words mean anymore." (Dean)
305 posted on 11/12/2006 7:42:07 AM PST by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: maica
Lots of boomers will be retiring, many are conservative,things sometimes change to fit changing markets.
306 posted on 11/12/2006 7:42:12 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
An alternative to football this afternoon,

Sacrilege!

Seriously, I admire the people on this thread who fight the good fight and catalog the sins of the lying, biased left wing stooges that call themselves media. I found some time ago I could no longer stand it.

307 posted on 11/12/2006 7:42:30 AM PST by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: samantha

The unfair thing here is, that in NJ when Torricelli was going to lose - dems were allowed to put Lotterburg's name in the last hours while in Florida there is a different law & Foley's name could not be changed. That is a shame & sham on the people of Florida.


308 posted on 11/12/2006 7:42:54 AM PST by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Exactly


309 posted on 11/12/2006 7:43:10 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
The majority party with a minority mindset

Thank you C7.

310 posted on 11/12/2006 7:43:21 AM PST by mcmuffin (My can of vintage '94 GOP WhoopA$$- Where'd it go?________________( flat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: anita

Anita, I agree with you 100%. I could just bash Bill Crystal's arrogant mouth as he makes his statements on Fox News this morning. For the first time I agreed with Juan Williams about something when he shot back at Crystal and his neocons being directly involved in this loss.


311 posted on 11/12/2006 7:44:45 AM PST by fschmieg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
The Democrats did make promises. Now let's see if they keep them or not

100% agreed...

312 posted on 11/12/2006 7:46:20 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Well, I almost totally disagree with you.

The things you are griping about are not lack of leadership, but lack of political conniving.

He just does not have the gene for dishonest conniving.

Take the border issue. Any rational person knows that some accommodation will eventually have to be made for at least a large portion of the illegals currently here.

I was hoping and praying that he would forget that long enough to get strict border enforcement passed and then, OF COURSE, we would have had to deal with that, and generally been willing to do so.

But he's just too blunt and honest. Too trusting of liars, maybe. But the best man we've had since Reagan and the best one we're likely to get for many years to come.

Maybe someday you will realize that.


313 posted on 11/12/2006 7:47:00 AM PST by altura (Second guessing is not a strategy. (George W. Bush, November 2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
The will over reach like they always do

It remains to be seen, but the MSM will be supporting them every step of the way. Waxman will be portrayed as a crusading congressman rooting out corruption and waste. The message will be the Dems are now in charge and all is well again.

The next two years will be a continuous campaign by the Dems until 2008. It took them 12 years to regain the House. It won't be easy to get it back any time soon. They know how to use the power of incumbency.

314 posted on 11/12/2006 7:47:25 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Beware. If you write letters to the editors in favor of George Bush that actually make it to publication in a liberal newspaper, you will be bombarded with hateful emails. That happened to me when I published one in the New York Times last year. They just google your name and find your email address.


315 posted on 11/12/2006 7:47:37 AM PST by fschmieg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Dowd and Gregory....a slut and a nut!


316 posted on 11/12/2006 7:47:42 AM PST by OldFriend (Run and Hide, Tax and Spend for the next two years. Everyone happy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Bernard
IMHO Rumsfeld would have remained if the Republicans had not lost control.

I believe the main reason he had to go was that both he and the President believed that the next 2 years he would spend the majority of his time in front of congressional hearing after another. He may well still do so but not as the current Secretary of Defense.

He could not have run his department and fulfilled overseas visits including NATO meetings with all of this going on at home.

And lastly get off your President's back and support like your fellow Republicans should have in congress and then the result last Tuesday would have probably been different. They caused the public to see the Republican party as fragmented and therefore did not give them confidence to vote for a Republican candidate coupled with the media portraying Republicans as radical right wingers.

317 posted on 11/12/2006 7:48:38 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
Here is yet another take from Michael Barone as interviewed by John Hinderaker--follow the links to Michelle Malkin's great piece as well.

http://Levin.nationalreview.com/
318 posted on 11/12/2006 7:49:05 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative

Go watch the video expose of Pelosi on YouTube --- http://youtube.com/watch?v=PC1L03CFlrw


319 posted on 11/12/2006 7:50:21 AM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Interestingly enough, Couric, who is blatantly biased, is only 'showing' in the ratings. And just barely. I read tht Geraldo's show is at time beating Couric in the ratings.


320 posted on 11/12/2006 7:50:25 AM PST by OldFriend (Run and Hide, Tax and Spend for the next two years. Everyone happy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,041-1,056 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson