Skip to comments.
Pres. Bush will hold 1 pm news conference. [significant announcement per Drudge]
FNC
| 11/08/2006
| FNC
Posted on 11/08/2006 4:27:22 AM PST by tsmith130
Subtle gong alert, scrolled on the bottom of the screen.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 841-842 next last
To: deep
Not just Iraq, but as you pointed out, fear of fighting the media. Republicans were afraid of being brandished as Nazis like they always are. Problem is, as far as liberals are concerned, Lieberman could switch to the GOP and become president, and George Soros would call even HIM a Nazi. The liberals in the media will never be our friends. Ronald Reagan's model was the best: You defeat the liberal media by rendering them irrelevant, by taking your ideas straight to the people.
101
posted on
11/08/2006 5:36:49 AM PST
by
Thane_Banquo
("Give a man a fish, make him a Democrat. Teach a man to fish, make him a Republican.")
To: Fresh Wind
It's too late now. If people didn't want to "get it" back then, they won't get it now.
To: paudio
I have to respectfully disagree. The libs have been waiting for this for six years. They can't help themselves. Bush is as good as impeached.
103
posted on
11/08/2006 5:38:15 AM PST
by
Uncle Vlad
(You cannot protect the peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.)
To: repvetsyiydli
They didn't say specifically but I'm sure it's a "we will work together" thing.
To: LadyNavyVet
I'm afraid of the same thing. After all, the Dems won, so isn't that what the people want?
To be truthful the dumbass American public wants what the mSM tells them they should want
Americans as a whole have been dumbed down and made weak by creeping socialism and think life should be a silver platter at their command
They haven't the faintest conception what real War Years are like
But Bush is another Nixon who didn't know how to win a war .
MSM is partly to blame but when you let things drag on because you use half assed measures in a war then they get the upper hand eventually
105
posted on
11/08/2006 5:39:05 AM PST
by
uncbob
To: tsmith130
106
posted on
11/08/2006 5:39:57 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: Toespi
I agree if you want to blame anyone don't blame the President or Rove but blame the Republican candidates/incumbents especially the incumbents if they had done a good job locally they would have been voted for regardless of what the Administration was saying or doing.
The bottom line however it is the media that has caused this as many Americans can only rely on the ABC networks for their news.
107
posted on
11/08/2006 5:40:40 AM PST
by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
To: Uncle Vlad
If the Democrats impeach Bush (baring some as yet unknown Lewinsky type scandal) they will lose the House, the Senate, and the WH in '08. It will be perceived as a brazen radical left-wing revenge grab. I don't see it happening. Pelosi said he won't be impeached because she knows what it would do to her party.
108
posted on
11/08/2006 5:42:52 AM PST
by
Thane_Banquo
("Give a man a fish, make him a Democrat. Teach a man to fish, make him a Republican.")
To: tsmith130
What do you bet he mentions the opportunity to now move forward on "immigration reform"? I think I'm gonna' be sick...
To: snugs
The bottom line however it is the media that has caused this as many Americans can only rely on the ABC networks for their news.
Yep and look for the remaining GOP wimps left in congress to go belly up and become full blown liberals
110
posted on
11/08/2006 5:44:18 AM PST
by
uncbob
To: BunnySlippers
Rove lied to us.
Why did we trust an old fat bald ugly guy anyway (sarc). He totally screwed up. Thank God I did not drink his kool aid.
To: streetpreacher
What do you bet he mentions the opportunity to now move forward on "immigration reform"? I think I'm gonna' be sick... I wonder what organized labor thinks of this, as they are a big supporter of the Dems...
112
posted on
11/08/2006 5:45:34 AM PST
by
Fury
To: uncbob
I hear ya. If we weren't in the war to win the flippin' thing, why were we there? You shouldn't go to war without the intention to give it all you've got. All out, pedal to the metal, until your enemy lies in complete ruins. Instead, we won't bomb mosques, won't bomb funerals, won't bomb where the Iraqi government says not to, etc.
To: tsmith130
With Kamrade Nikita Pelosi looking on wearing her death-grin-of-horror, Bush will concede graciously (the Bush's are bred to do that) and he will announce that he intends to work with the new congressional leadership to keep America secure.
Above all he will try to sound a clear warning to terrorists that Americans are unified and not to interpret this change as a victory for terrorism.
Which, of course, is exactly what it is.
To: Stallone
The Republicans lost because they abandonned the conservative principles espoused by Ronald Reagan and acted like 'moderate' democrats instead.
115
posted on
11/08/2006 5:50:23 AM PST
by
pgkdan
To: tsmith130
It's not the WIPEOUT that lardball was claiming, so DUmmies can rejoice, but they better get used to GRIDLOCK...50-50 senate and small majority in the house isn't enough to dictate terms or for Bush to cave on his agenda.
116
posted on
11/08/2006 5:53:28 AM PST
by
RasterMaster
(Winning Islamic hearts and minds.........one bullet at a time!)
To: uncbob
I honestly believe that we are like the frog slowly boiling in the pot. This MSM win will empower them even more. Unless we can get rid of this third party assault, I don't see any way for conservatives to win in the near future. It's not pretty today.
117
posted on
11/08/2006 5:54:17 AM PST
by
adc
(Rush '08)
To: deep
Iraq is the main reason the GOP lost, along with their fear of fighting the media. Until Republicans realize that Iraq is not popular with most Americans, including Republicans we will continue to lose. I wouldn't say Iraq is the culprit, part of it, but the problem is much bigger overall. What have the Republicans really done in office? Even when Clinton was President and we controlled both houses, the typical rant we heard was, "well...the bill would just be vetoed so there isn't any point trying to pass it."
Systemically, there has been a complete lack of leadership. Both Hastert and Lott were more concerned with being perceived as individuals willing to work with the other side, even though we know from experience that you'll be stabbed in the back later on.
We essentially controlled all three branches and the Republicans did nothing...nothing, about border security. This is in spite of the fact that the majority of Americans wanted somthing done. The real problem is a lack of leadership......
While disappointed about yesterday's outcome, I'm not totally surprised about it either.
To: Stallone
AGREE 100%. We need a person that will simply play hard, be smart and speak well.
Tancredo.
119
posted on
11/08/2006 6:02:28 AM PST
by
SQUID
To: ErieGeno
Now that would REALLY piss off the Hildebeast!
120
posted on
11/08/2006 6:03:23 AM PST
by
GnL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 841-842 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson