Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: republican; rboatman; tame; Alamo-Girl; zappo; backhoe; goseminoles; Balding_Eagle; ...

One thing that I've noticed in recent polls is that a majority of Americans disapprove of the way Bush is handling the war in Iraq ... but only 17% want an immediate withdrawal.

It tells me that most of those who are dissatisfied want Bush to do what it takes to WIN IT.


17 posted on 11/07/2006 11:50:18 PM PST by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bryan

Bingo!

Americans want to be proud again.


37 posted on 11/07/2006 11:54:47 PM PST by I_like_good_things_too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan

Hey Bry! Get ahold of me tomorrow!


66 posted on 11/08/2006 12:06:16 AM PST by Cheapskate ( Preserve your freedom! ! Slap down the NANNY STATE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan

You left out the part that wants to begin withdrawal. There is a clear majority of voters who want us to withdraw.


84 posted on 11/08/2006 12:13:31 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan
It tells me that most of those who are dissatisfied want Bush to do what it takes to WIN IT.

It goes back to what works and what doesn't. Going into a war with any goal other than to achieve a precise military victory via elimination of the enemy OR the unconditional surrender and laying down of arms does not work. Show me a war the U.S. fought and won in which it did. Going in and trying to fight with one hand tied behind your back with the idea to rebuild a nation does not. Show me one U.S. war in which it did. We tossed aside the military wisdom of Generals Washington, Patton, McArthur, Ike, Sherman, Abrhams, Forrest, and many others who knew what the price of war required to purchase victory.

People want to have Iraq both ways and it can't be done. Either wipe it out and be done about it which should have been stated clearly by congress, or get out. I don't like option #2 especially since American Service members have died in combat so IMO that option is off the table. But I don't think option number one can include rebuilding a new Iraq either especially while terrorist cells will be operating there with what we build them. This is not the culture of Germany or Japan we are dealing with or any European or Asian culture that understands Surrender or STOP. The hate inside that nation is as old as our Bible. That is reality. They understand might and charity of their enemy is a weakness to expliot in their eyes. Charity has no place in war especially to the enemy. We have forgotten that as well. No charity was even shown our own people in our own Civil War.

We're not going to make the three factions get along even if we if we stay there till 2100. Which comes back to what is the purpose of war? War is a punishment of an enemy nation. You can not punish and reward at the same time which is what's going on.

Solution? Do as we did up till 1945 and fight the same. Fight a war as if our very survival depended on it. That means you take out the nation and all infrastructure that could be used in the future as a threat. It wasn't done in Iraq in Gulf War one and it isn't being done now.

Iraq should have been history a year ago and our forces in the draw down stage or likely home with a victory under their belts. The Iraqi tribes should be fighting each other with rocks now. The whole thing has become a diplomatic boondoggle including the trials. Saddam isn't dead yet and the longer he lives the longer people fight in his name. A U.S. military tribunal should have happened and his execution been over and done. This man was the reason why we went there to start with according to the congressional declaration. Should we have turned Hitler over to Germany? Remember they put him in power. It was insane the way it was handled.

Our nations concept of war and how we fight changed right after WW2 and it wasn't for the better. Our education system was invaded by Marxist and unfortunately they brainwashed several generations into believing war can be won by playing by the enemies rule book. Many are now elected office holders making defense policy.

I do not believe in using troops to oversee nation building. That is not the purpose of a United States member of the armed forces. Their job is to defend the United States of America from all enemies foreign and domestic. That means their job is to kill. You want nation builders? Call Carter but leave our armed forces out of it. Untie their hands and let them be soldiers and get the job done.

185 posted on 11/08/2006 2:01:33 AM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan

Most people have no idea what they voted for. They followed the duping of the MSM.


292 posted on 11/08/2006 7:45:34 AM PST by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan

I have said this until I am sure you are all sick of it, but the only reason the people are against the war is because of the lies of the leftist media. They are stupid enough to believe anything the MSM says. If they only knew the real truth this would not be happening.


319 posted on 11/08/2006 3:50:16 PM PST by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson