Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.
November 3rd 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 11/02/2006 8:48:45 PM PST by jveritas

Edited on 11/02/2006 11:06:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 501-512 next last
To: Sturm Ruger

I've put the URL for the cnn article in my tagline.


321 posted on 11/03/2006 3:53:16 AM PST by syriacus (2002-UK declassified Nuke building docs- http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/04/15/uk.nuclear/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you jveritas! I was sure we could count on you to come through like this.


322 posted on 11/03/2006 3:53:28 AM PST by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Bravo!


323 posted on 11/03/2006 3:58:56 AM PST by tiredoflaundry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

For the cause,
the right cause !


324 posted on 11/03/2006 4:08:26 AM PST by IrishMike (Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I also posted a link to this on LGF (besides emailing it to Bush, Rush, Drudge, Santorum, Hannity, Brit Hume, O'Reilly, Fox & Friends etc). Hopefully some people will see it.


325 posted on 11/03/2006 4:10:10 AM PST by PghBaldy (This hominid named Kerry annoys me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76; jveritas

Good job, jveritas.

The NYT tries to make clear that the nuclear program notes are from pre 1991:

"But in recent weeks, the site has posted some documents that weapons experts say are a danger themselves: detailed accounts of Iraq’s secret nuclear research before the 1991 Persian Gulf war. The documents, the experts say, constitute a basic guide to building an atom bomb."

But then confusion reigns because the NYT reports that Iraq was a year away from building an atom bomb. Were they talking about 1991 or 2002? This paragraph is unclear:

"Among the dozens of documents in English were Iraqi reports written in the 1990’s and in 2002 for United Nations inspectors in charge of making sure Iraq abandoned its unconventional arms programs after the Persian Gulf war. Experts say that at the time, Mr. Hussein’s scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away."


326 posted on 11/03/2006 4:13:44 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Thank you, jveritas!

Bump for later.

327 posted on 11/03/2006 4:13:48 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Everyone should email this (and the CNN 2002 story about UK releasing detailed nuke info?). There are two issues here: 1. Saddam had WMD plans and will 2. The supposedly dangerous info on internet (we just have word of NYT that it could not be obtained elsewhere)


328 posted on 11/03/2006 4:15:58 AM PST by PghBaldy (This hominid named Kerry annoys me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; freema; RaceBannon

It is my belief that this is a preemptive strike by the Times against a larger story coming in the next couple of days, almost a last great act of desperation by the Times to get President Bush before they are totally blown away by something that they are hearing leaks about.

There is no other reason possible why they would come so close to admitting Saddam was even thinking about Nukes much less building one.


329 posted on 11/03/2006 4:21:51 AM PST by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese, that why I don't sing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

BTTT


330 posted on 11/03/2006 4:31:16 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
t is my belief that this is a preemptive strike by the Times against a larger story coming in the next couple of days,

I agree.

331 posted on 11/03/2006 4:37:11 AM PST by syriacus (2002-UK declassified Nuke building docs- http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/04/15/uk.nuclear/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

You, jveritas, are a hero. Thank you for all the work you have done on this over the last couple years.


332 posted on 11/03/2006 4:37:46 AM PST by arbee4bush (Our Airman Daughter KB4W--Hero, Patriot and the Love of her mom & dads life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

UGH. I wish I hadn't decided to go to work today...


333 posted on 11/03/2006 4:38:12 AM PST by PghBaldy (This hominid named Kerry annoys me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
UGH. I wish I hadn't decided to go to work today...

It's difficult to stop thinking about the election.

334 posted on 11/03/2006 4:58:38 AM PST by syriacus (2002-UK declassified Nuke building docs- http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/04/15/uk.nuclear/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

ping


335 posted on 11/03/2006 4:59:37 AM PST by bc4gwb (http://bamapachyderm.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Just hearing about this on the morning news. Thank goodness we have patriots like yourself working tirelessly to bring us the real truth. I hope Tony Snow is reading and can put this out quickly.


I am incredulous at the obvious posturing of the NYT.


336 posted on 11/03/2006 5:10:15 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semi Civil Servant
Someone close to the EIB microphone has posted on this very thread.

A tantalizing suggestion!

337 posted on 11/03/2006 5:14:06 AM PST by Petronski (CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

bttt the great work!


338 posted on 11/03/2006 5:18:03 AM PST by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Does anybody have a recap of how this has been covered on the morning shows? I have only watched F & F, and could have missed it, but I didn't even see them cover the NYT's story at all. Anybody else?


339 posted on 11/03/2006 5:19:25 AM PST by A Citizen Reporter (Sign at World Series in St. Louis, October 27, 2006 "The Experts are Idiots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

btt


340 posted on 11/03/2006 5:21:38 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 501-512 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson